Patient Decisional Preferences: A Systematic Review of Instruments Used to Determine Patients' Preferred Role in Decision-Making.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Research and Review Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1177/10775587251316917
Mahdi Neshan, Vennila Padmanaban, Naleef Fareed, Samantha M Ruff, Elizabeth Palmer Kelly, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"Patient Decisional Preferences: A Systematic Review of Instruments Used to Determine Patients' Preferred Role in Decision-Making.","authors":"Mahdi Neshan, Vennila Padmanaban, Naleef Fareed, Samantha M Ruff, Elizabeth Palmer Kelly, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1177/10775587251316917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decision control preferences (DCPs) refer to the degree of control patients' desire over their medical treatment. Several validated tools exist to evaluate a patient's DCPs, yet there is no universally used instrument and their use in clinical settings is lacking. We provide a systematic comparative summary of available DCP tools. Following a systematic database search, English language studies across medical contexts and patient populations were eligible if a validated assessment tool to evaluate patient DCPs was reported. Among the 15 tools that met inclusion criteria, the autonomy preference index (API) and the control preference scale (CPS) were the most used tools (API: 40%, CPS: 26.6%). Most studies (<i>n</i> = 9) sought to identify the information-seeking preferences of patients as a critical component of decision-making. Only few studies evaluated providers' perceptions of patient preferences. Considering the variety of patients' DCPs, implementation of DCP tools can optimize shared decision-making and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":" ","pages":"225-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587251316917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision control preferences (DCPs) refer to the degree of control patients' desire over their medical treatment. Several validated tools exist to evaluate a patient's DCPs, yet there is no universally used instrument and their use in clinical settings is lacking. We provide a systematic comparative summary of available DCP tools. Following a systematic database search, English language studies across medical contexts and patient populations were eligible if a validated assessment tool to evaluate patient DCPs was reported. Among the 15 tools that met inclusion criteria, the autonomy preference index (API) and the control preference scale (CPS) were the most used tools (API: 40%, CPS: 26.6%). Most studies (n = 9) sought to identify the information-seeking preferences of patients as a critical component of decision-making. Only few studies evaluated providers' perceptions of patient preferences. Considering the variety of patients' DCPs, implementation of DCP tools can optimize shared decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者决策偏好:用于确定患者在决策中的首选角色的工具的系统综述。
决策控制偏好(dcp)是指患者对治疗的控制程度。有几种有效的工具可以评估患者的dcp,但没有普遍使用的仪器,在临床环境中缺乏使用。我们提供了可用DCP工具的系统比较摘要。经过系统的数据库搜索,如果报告了有效的评估工具来评估患者dcp,则跨医学背景和患者群体的英语语言研究符合条件。在满足纳入标准的15个工具中,自主偏好指数(API)和控制偏好量表(CPS)是使用最多的工具(API: 40%, CPS: 26.6%)。大多数研究(n = 9)试图确定患者的信息寻求偏好作为决策的关键组成部分。只有少数研究评估了提供者对患者偏好的看法。考虑到患者DCP的多样性,实施DCP工具可以优化共享决策并改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
期刊最新文献
Defining and Measuring Organizational Transformation in Health Care: A Systematic Literature Review. The Dynamic and Multisource Nature of Support for Frontline-Led Innovation Teams. Do Must-Access Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) Affect Pain and Impairment Outcomes in Older Adults? Does Health-Based Prospective Risk Adjustment Adequately Compensate for Individuals Diagnosed With a New Chronic Disease? Utilizing a Health Equity Framework to Explore Patient-Level Factors Impacting Effective Hypertension Management Across Two Academic Health Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1