Rural-Urban Differences in Patient-Sharing by Clinicians Caring for Children with Medical Complexity: Network Analysis of the Pediatric Workforce in Three States

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114506
Erika L. Moen PhD, MS , Seneca D. Freyleue MS , Mary Arakelyan MPH , Andrew P. Schaefer PhD , A. James O'Malley PhD , David C. Goodman MD, MS , JoAnna K. Leyenaar MD, PhD, MPH
{"title":"Rural-Urban Differences in Patient-Sharing by Clinicians Caring for Children with Medical Complexity: Network Analysis of the Pediatric Workforce in Three States","authors":"Erika L. Moen PhD, MS ,&nbsp;Seneca D. Freyleue MS ,&nbsp;Mary Arakelyan MPH ,&nbsp;Andrew P. Schaefer PhD ,&nbsp;A. James O'Malley PhD ,&nbsp;David C. Goodman MD, MS ,&nbsp;JoAnna K. Leyenaar MD, PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine rural-urban differences in the clinician workforce caring for children with medical complexity (CMC) in ambulatory settings and to determine how measures of clinician patient-sharing differ for rural- and urban-residing CMC.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We analyzed Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Colorado all-payer claims data from 2012 through 2017 to identify CMC and their clinicians. We assembled patient-sharing networks in which clinicians were connected on the basis of having encounters with common pediatric patients. We evaluated rural-urban differences in CMC care team size, composition (ie, which specialists were included), and care density (ie, extent to which a CMC's care team shared patients) and network measures of primary care clinician (PCC) centrality (eg, number of patient-sharing relationships).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis included 107 692 CMC, of whom 7065 (7.0%) were rural-residing and 100 627 (93.0%) were urban-residing. Rural-residing CMC had lower relative risk of having a PCC specialized in pediatrics (relative risk 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.89) compared with urban-residing CMC. Despite having similarly sized care teams, rural-residing CMC had substantially lower care density (median [IQR] = 21.6 [7.9, 72.8]) compared with urban-residing CMC (median [IQR] = 48.3 [13.0, 158.7]). Rural PCC were less central in the networks and had a greater percentage of connections with advanced practice providers compared with their urban counterparts (median [IQR] = 19.2 [14.3, 24.5] vs 14.3 [7.5, 23.4]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study provides new insight into the clinicians and teams caring for CMC. Rural-residing CMC were more likely to receive care from clinicians with fewer connections and lower care density, reflecting fewer shared patients within the team. Programs supporting care of CMC may benefit from recognizing rural-urban differences in team composition and relationships between clinicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 114506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347625000460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine rural-urban differences in the clinician workforce caring for children with medical complexity (CMC) in ambulatory settings and to determine how measures of clinician patient-sharing differ for rural- and urban-residing CMC.

Study design

We analyzed Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Colorado all-payer claims data from 2012 through 2017 to identify CMC and their clinicians. We assembled patient-sharing networks in which clinicians were connected on the basis of having encounters with common pediatric patients. We evaluated rural-urban differences in CMC care team size, composition (ie, which specialists were included), and care density (ie, extent to which a CMC's care team shared patients) and network measures of primary care clinician (PCC) centrality (eg, number of patient-sharing relationships).

Results

Analysis included 107 692 CMC, of whom 7065 (7.0%) were rural-residing and 100 627 (93.0%) were urban-residing. Rural-residing CMC had lower relative risk of having a PCC specialized in pediatrics (relative risk 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.89) compared with urban-residing CMC. Despite having similarly sized care teams, rural-residing CMC had substantially lower care density (median [IQR] = 21.6 [7.9, 72.8]) compared with urban-residing CMC (median [IQR] = 48.3 [13.0, 158.7]). Rural PCC were less central in the networks and had a greater percentage of connections with advanced practice providers compared with their urban counterparts (median [IQR] = 19.2 [14.3, 24.5] vs 14.3 [7.5, 23.4]).

Conclusions

Our study provides new insight into the clinicians and teams caring for CMC. Rural-residing CMC were more likely to receive care from clinicians with fewer connections and lower care density, reflecting fewer shared patients within the team. Programs supporting care of CMC may benefit from recognizing rural-urban differences in team composition and relationships between clinicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城乡差异的患者共享由临床医生照顾儿童的医疗复杂性:网络分析儿科劳动力在3个州。
目的:探讨农村和城市在门诊环境中照顾患有医疗复杂性(CMC)儿童的临床医生队伍的差异,并确定农村和城市居住的CMC的临床医生患者分担措施的差异。研究设计:我们分析了马萨诸塞州、新罕布什尔州和科罗拉多州2012年至2017年的全付款人索赔数据,以确定CMC及其临床医生。我们建立了患者共享网络,临床医生通过与普通儿科患者的接触联系在一起。我们评估了农村和城市在CMC护理团队规模、组成(即包括哪些专家)、护理密度(即CMC护理团队共享患者的程度)和初级保健临床医生(PCC)中心性的网络测量(例如,患者共享关系的数量)方面的差异。结果:共纳入CMC 107692人,其中农村7065人(7.0%),城市100627人(93.0%)。居住在农村的CMC与居住在城市的CMC相比,患儿科专科PCC的相对风险(RR [95% CI])较低(RR =0.81[0.73-0.89])。尽管拥有相似规模的护理团队,但与居住在城市的CMC(中位数[IQR]=48.3[13.0-158.7])相比,居住在农村的CMC的护理密度明显较低(中位数[IQR]=21.6[7.9-72.8])。与城市同行相比,农村PCC在网络中的中心位置较低,与高级执业提供者的联系比例更高(中位数[IQR]=19.2 [14.3-24.5] vs. 14.3[7.5-23.4])。结论:我们的研究为临床医生和团队护理CMC提供了新的见解。居住在农村的CMC更有可能接受联系较少和护理密度较低的临床医生的护理,导致团队内共享患者较少。认识到城乡在团队组成和临床医生之间的关系方面的差异,可以促进CMC的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatrics
Journal of Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
696
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy. Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to: General Pediatrics Pediatric Subspecialties Adolescent Medicine Allergy and Immunology Cardiology Critical Care Medicine Developmental-Behavioral Medicine Endocrinology Gastroenterology Hematology-Oncology Infectious Diseases Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Emergency Medicine Pulmonology Rheumatology Genetics Ethics Health Service Research Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Person and Family-Centered Feeding Research Consortium Symposium: Consensus Research Priorities for Pediatric Feeding Disorder (PFD) and Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID). Breaking Point to Breakthrough: Review of Flexible Scheduling Models for Sustainable Clinical Care. Initial Hemodynamic Phenotypes and Clinical Trajectory in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Pilot Study. Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Microbial Diversity and Urine NGAL for the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections in Children with Spina Bifida. Procedural Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST): An International Matched Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1