Relative contributions of predictive vs. associative processes to infant looking behavior during language comprehension

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Child Language Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1017/s0305000924000102
Tracy E. Reuter, Lauren L. Emberson
{"title":"Relative contributions of predictive vs. associative processes to infant looking behavior during language comprehension","authors":"Tracy E. Reuter, Lauren L. Emberson","doi":"10.1017/s0305000924000102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous developmental findings suggest that infants and toddlers engage predictive processing during language comprehension. However, a significant limitation of this research is that associative (bottom-up) and predictive (top-down) explanations are not readily differentiated. Following adult studies that varied predictiveness relative to semantic-relatedness to differentiate associative vs. predictive processes, the present study used eye-tracking to begin to disentangle the contributions of bottom-up and top-down mechanisms to infants’ real-time language processing. Replicating prior results, infants (14-19 months old) use successive semantically-related words across sentences (e.g., <jats:italic>eat, yum, mouth</jats:italic>) to predict upcoming nouns (e.g., <jats:italic>cookie</jats:italic>). However, we also provide evidence that using successive semantically-related words to predict is distinct from the bottom-up activation of the word itself. In a second experiment, we investigate the potential effects of repetition on the findings. This work is the first to reveal that infant language comprehension is affected by both associative and predictive processes.","PeriodicalId":48132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Language","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000924000102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous developmental findings suggest that infants and toddlers engage predictive processing during language comprehension. However, a significant limitation of this research is that associative (bottom-up) and predictive (top-down) explanations are not readily differentiated. Following adult studies that varied predictiveness relative to semantic-relatedness to differentiate associative vs. predictive processes, the present study used eye-tracking to begin to disentangle the contributions of bottom-up and top-down mechanisms to infants’ real-time language processing. Replicating prior results, infants (14-19 months old) use successive semantically-related words across sentences (e.g., eat, yum, mouth) to predict upcoming nouns (e.g., cookie). However, we also provide evidence that using successive semantically-related words to predict is distinct from the bottom-up activation of the word itself. In a second experiment, we investigate the potential effects of repetition on the findings. This work is the first to reveal that infant language comprehension is affected by both associative and predictive processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言理解过程中预测过程与联想过程对婴儿注视行为的相对贡献
许多发展研究表明,婴幼儿在语言理解过程中参与预测加工。然而,本研究的一个重要局限性是联想(自下而上)和预测(自上而下)的解释不容易区分。在对成人的研究中,研究人员通过改变预测性和语义相关性来区分联想过程和预测过程,本研究使用眼动追踪来开始理清自下而上和自上而下机制对婴儿实时语言处理的贡献。重复先前的结果,婴儿(14-19个月)在句子中使用连续的语义相关单词(例如,eat, yum, mouth)来预测即将出现的名词(例如,cookie)。然而,我们也提供了证据,使用连续的语义相关的单词来预测不同于自下而上的单词本身的激活。在第二个实验中,我们研究了重复对结果的潜在影响。这项研究首次揭示了婴儿语言理解同时受到联想过程和预测过程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A key publication in the field, Journal of Child Language publishes articles on all aspects of the scientific study of language behaviour in children, the principles which underlie it, and the theories which may account for it. The international range of authors and breadth of coverage allow the journal to forge links between many different areas of research including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science and anthropology. This interdisciplinary approach spans a wide range of interests: phonology, phonetics, morphology, syntax, vocabulary, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, or any other recognised facet of language study.
期刊最新文献
Risk of early language deprivation among deaf bilinguals with early signing experience: Evidence from American Sign Language basic word order and bilingual proficiency. Voice quality modifications in Hungarian infant-directed speech: A longitudinal acoustic study. Working Memory and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge in Foreign Language Young Learners: A Cross-Lagged Panel Design Approach The Development of Canonical Proportion as a Function of Community, Multilingualism, and Target Language's Syllable Complexity. Differential effects of sociolinguistic background, nonverbal reasoning, and phonological WM skills on heritage bilingual children's L1 and L2 competencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1