Cognitive Decline After First-Time Transient Ischemic Attack

IF 21.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY JAMA neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5082
Victor A. Del Bene, George Howard, Toby I. Gropen, Michael J. Lyerly, Virginia J. Howard, Russell P. Sawyer, Ronald M. Lazar
{"title":"Cognitive Decline After First-Time Transient Ischemic Attack","authors":"Victor A. Del Bene, George Howard, Toby I. Gropen, Michael J. Lyerly, Virginia J. Howard, Russell P. Sawyer, Ronald M. Lazar","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportancePrior research suggests reduced cognitive function after transient ischemic attack (TIA). Whether this is directly related to the TIA, a function of preexisting risk factors, or prior cognitive decline remains unclear.ObjectiveTo study if a single, diffusion-weighted image–negative, adjudicated TIA is associated with longitudinal declines in cognition, independent of preexisting risk factors.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a secondary data analysis from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, a population-based cohort following up 30 239 Black and White participants for incident cerebrovascular events. The setting consisted of telephone cognitive assessments. Participants were individuals with first-time TIA, first-time stroke, and asymptomatic community control groups with neuroimaging used for adjudication.ExposuresFirst-time TIA and stroke.Main Outcomes and MeasuresVerbal fluency and memory measures administered biannually. Primary outcome was a composite standardized <jats:italic>z</jats:italic> score, with secondary outcomes individual test performances. Adjusted segmented regression models characterized pre-event and postevent cognition and annual cognitive change.ResultsIncluded in the study were 356 individuals with first-time TIA (mean [SD] age, 66.6 [8.7]; 188 female [53%]) and 965 individuals with first-time stroke (mean [SD] age, 66.8 [8.2]; 494 male [51%]). A total of 14 882 individuals (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [8.6] years; 8439 female [57%]) were included in the asymptomatic control group. Overall cognitive composite before index event was lower in the stroke (−0.25; 95% CI, −0.32 to −0.17) than TIA (−0.05; 95% CI: −0.17 to 0.07; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .005) and asymptomatic (0; 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.03; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) groups. After the index event, the cognitive composite of the group with stroke significantly declined (−0.14; 95% CI, −0.21 to −0.07) compared with that of the group with TIA (0.01; 95% CI, −0.10 to 0.12; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02) and controls (−0.03; 95% CI, −0.05 to −0.01; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .003). The annual decline after the index event was faster (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .001) in the group with TIA (−0.05; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.03) than that for asymptomatic controls (−0.02; 95% CI, −0.02 to −0.02) but not different from the group with stroke (−0.04; 95% CI, −0.05 to −0.03; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .43).Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this cohort study suggest that despite the quick resolution of stroke symptoms in TIA, there was apparently sufficient impact to be associated with long-term cognitive decline. Whether the underlying mechanisms are by direct or secondary injury and/or interaction with concomitant neurodegenerative factors remains to be elucidated.","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportancePrior research suggests reduced cognitive function after transient ischemic attack (TIA). Whether this is directly related to the TIA, a function of preexisting risk factors, or prior cognitive decline remains unclear.ObjectiveTo study if a single, diffusion-weighted image–negative, adjudicated TIA is associated with longitudinal declines in cognition, independent of preexisting risk factors.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a secondary data analysis from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, a population-based cohort following up 30 239 Black and White participants for incident cerebrovascular events. The setting consisted of telephone cognitive assessments. Participants were individuals with first-time TIA, first-time stroke, and asymptomatic community control groups with neuroimaging used for adjudication.ExposuresFirst-time TIA and stroke.Main Outcomes and MeasuresVerbal fluency and memory measures administered biannually. Primary outcome was a composite standardized z score, with secondary outcomes individual test performances. Adjusted segmented regression models characterized pre-event and postevent cognition and annual cognitive change.ResultsIncluded in the study were 356 individuals with first-time TIA (mean [SD] age, 66.6 [8.7]; 188 female [53%]) and 965 individuals with first-time stroke (mean [SD] age, 66.8 [8.2]; 494 male [51%]). A total of 14 882 individuals (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [8.6] years; 8439 female [57%]) were included in the asymptomatic control group. Overall cognitive composite before index event was lower in the stroke (−0.25; 95% CI, −0.32 to −0.17) than TIA (−0.05; 95% CI: −0.17 to 0.07; P = .005) and asymptomatic (0; 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.03; P &amp;lt; .001) groups. After the index event, the cognitive composite of the group with stroke significantly declined (−0.14; 95% CI, −0.21 to −0.07) compared with that of the group with TIA (0.01; 95% CI, −0.10 to 0.12; P = .02) and controls (−0.03; 95% CI, −0.05 to −0.01; P = .003). The annual decline after the index event was faster (P = .001) in the group with TIA (−0.05; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.03) than that for asymptomatic controls (−0.02; 95% CI, −0.02 to −0.02) but not different from the group with stroke (−0.04; 95% CI, −0.05 to −0.03; P = .43).Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this cohort study suggest that despite the quick resolution of stroke symptoms in TIA, there was apparently sufficient impact to be associated with long-term cognitive decline. Whether the underlying mechanisms are by direct or secondary injury and/or interaction with concomitant neurodegenerative factors remains to be elucidated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次短暂性脑缺血发作后认知能力下降
先前的研究表明短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)后认知功能下降。目前尚不清楚这是否与TIA直接相关,是先前存在的风险因素的功能,还是先前的认知能力下降。目的研究是否单一的弥散加权图像阴性,判定TIA与纵向认知能力下降有关,独立于先前存在的危险因素。设计、环境和参与者:这是卒中地理和种族差异原因(REGARDS)研究的辅助数据分析,该研究是一项基于人群的队列研究,随访30239名黑人和白人参与者的脑血管事件。研究环境包括电话认知评估。参与者为首次TIA患者、首次卒中患者和无症状社区对照组,神经影像学用于判定。首次TIA和中风。主要结果和测量:语言流畅性和记忆测量每半年进行一次。主要结果是综合标准化z分数,次要结果是个体测试表现。调整后的分段回归模型表征了事件前和事件后的认知和年度认知变化。结果本研究纳入356例首次TIA患者(平均[SD]年龄66.6 [8.7];188名女性[53%])和965名首次卒中患者(平均[SD]年龄66.8 [8.2];494名男性[51%])。共14 882例(平均[SD]年龄63.2[8.6]岁;女性8439例(57%)为无症状对照组。卒中患者在指数事件前的整体认知综合能力较低(- 0.25;95% CI,−0.32 ~−0.17)优于TIA(−0.05;95% CI:−0.17 ~ 0.07;P = 0.005)和无症状(0;95% CI,−0.03 ~ 0.03;P, amp;肝移植;措施)组。指数事件发生后,脑卒中组的认知综合能力显著下降(- 0.14;95% CI,−0.21 ~−0.07),与TIA组比较(0.01;95% CI,−0.10 ~ 0.12;P = .02)和对照组(- 0.03;95% CI,−0.05 ~−0.01;P = .003)。TIA组指数事件后的年下降速度更快(P = 0.001)(−0.05;95% CI,−0.06至−0.03)比无症状对照组(−0.02;95% CI,−0.02至−0.02),但与卒中组无差异(−0.04;95% CI,−0.05 ~−0.03;P = .43)。结论和相关性本队列研究的结果表明,尽管TIA患者的卒中症状可以快速缓解,但明显存在与长期认知能力下降相关的足够影响。潜在的机制是否由直接或继发性损伤和/或与伴随的神经退行性因素的相互作用仍然有待阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Signal, Speculation, and Standards of Proof in Iatrogenic Alzheimer Disease. Early vs Delayed Extubation After Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The EDESTROKE Randomized Clinical Trial. High-Level Alzheimer Disease Neuropathological Change Following Iatrogenic Exposure. The Self-Test. Tilting at Treadmills-Pitfalls and Potential of Dementia Prevention Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1