Qian Zhang, Shuheng Tang, Songhang Zhang, Zhaodong Xi, Di Xin, Tengfei Jia, Xiongxiong Yang, Ke Zhang, Jianxin Li, Zhizhen Wang
{"title":"Methane Adsorption Capacity of Deep Buried Coal Seam Based on Full-Scale Pore Structure","authors":"Qian Zhang, Shuheng Tang, Songhang Zhang, Zhaodong Xi, Di Xin, Tengfei Jia, Xiongxiong Yang, Ke Zhang, Jianxin Li, Zhizhen Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11053-024-10454-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coalbed methane primarily exists as adsorbed gas within the microscopic pores and fractures of coal. However, the complex pore structure of deep coal seams and its quantitative relationship with methane adsorption capacity remain unclear. This study investigated nine samples from a coal seam in the Ningwu Basin, representing different burial depths, including five middle-shallow and four deep burials. This was accomplished through a series of experiments, including high-pressure mercury injection (HPMI), low-temperature nitrogen adsorption (LTGA–N<sub>2</sub>), low-pressure carbon dioxide adsorption (LPGA–CO<sub>2</sub>), and high-pressure (30 MPa) methane isothermal adsorption (HPGA–CH<sub>4</sub>). The study revealed the characteristics of the pore structure in deep coal seams and their differences compared to those in middle-shallow coal seams. Moreover, it clarified the mechanism by which the pore structure influences CH<sub>4</sub> adsorption capacity. Given the differences in methane adsorption mechanisms at various pore scales, a novel method for quantitatively assessing the methane adsorption capacity using pore structure parameters is proposed. The results showed that the micropore pore volume and specific surface area of the deep coal seam were significantly higher than those of the middle-shallow coal seams. In contrast, the development of mesopores and macropores was relatively limited. The CH<sub>4</sub> adsorption capacity of a coal seam was calculated using pore structure parameters across multiple scales, considering the coexistence of two-dimensional “filling adsorption” and three-dimensional “monolayer adsorption” mechanisms. The calculated capacity<i> V</i><sub><i>L</i></sub>’ closely matched the measured value of <i>V</i><sub><i>L</i></sub>, with error of less than 10%. The degree of micropore development is the main factor influencing the accuracy of this method. Therefore, using pore structure parameters at different scales to calculate methane adsorption capacity is effective and feasible for deep coal seams with extensive micropore development. This study established a connection between microscopic pore structure and macroscopic methane adsorption capacity, offering a novel method to determine the methane adsorption capacity of deep coal seams.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"22 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10454-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Coalbed methane primarily exists as adsorbed gas within the microscopic pores and fractures of coal. However, the complex pore structure of deep coal seams and its quantitative relationship with methane adsorption capacity remain unclear. This study investigated nine samples from a coal seam in the Ningwu Basin, representing different burial depths, including five middle-shallow and four deep burials. This was accomplished through a series of experiments, including high-pressure mercury injection (HPMI), low-temperature nitrogen adsorption (LTGA–N2), low-pressure carbon dioxide adsorption (LPGA–CO2), and high-pressure (30 MPa) methane isothermal adsorption (HPGA–CH4). The study revealed the characteristics of the pore structure in deep coal seams and their differences compared to those in middle-shallow coal seams. Moreover, it clarified the mechanism by which the pore structure influences CH4 adsorption capacity. Given the differences in methane adsorption mechanisms at various pore scales, a novel method for quantitatively assessing the methane adsorption capacity using pore structure parameters is proposed. The results showed that the micropore pore volume and specific surface area of the deep coal seam were significantly higher than those of the middle-shallow coal seams. In contrast, the development of mesopores and macropores was relatively limited. The CH4 adsorption capacity of a coal seam was calculated using pore structure parameters across multiple scales, considering the coexistence of two-dimensional “filling adsorption” and three-dimensional “monolayer adsorption” mechanisms. The calculated capacity VL’ closely matched the measured value of VL, with error of less than 10%. The degree of micropore development is the main factor influencing the accuracy of this method. Therefore, using pore structure parameters at different scales to calculate methane adsorption capacity is effective and feasible for deep coal seams with extensive micropore development. This study established a connection between microscopic pore structure and macroscopic methane adsorption capacity, offering a novel method to determine the methane adsorption capacity of deep coal seams.
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.