Genially as an Effective Resource to Improve the Dynamics and Motivation in the Chemical Engineering Degree

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01377
Manuel Peñas-Garzón, Irene Moreno-Medina*, Jorge Bedia and Carolina Belver*, 
{"title":"Genially as an Effective Resource to Improve the Dynamics and Motivation in the Chemical Engineering Degree","authors":"Manuel Peñas-Garzón,&nbsp;Irene Moreno-Medina*,&nbsp;Jorge Bedia and Carolina Belver*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Reinforcing and maintaining an adequate dynamic in the classroom is a key aspect of the teaching–learning process. This work reports the use of Genially software aimed at improving students’ motivation and engagement within the course of Gaseous Effluent Treatment Technologies in the Chemical Engineering Degree. The evaluation of the implemented modifications was carried out through two different mechanisms to get the students’ opinions about the innovation: (i) the development of a specific survey instrument; (ii) the analysis of the activity scores achieved during the practical lessons. The results suggested that this proposal was favorably accepted by the students (with an acceptance rate above 95%, as shown by the answers from the specific survey), besides increasing the scores directly related to the topics in which it was applied (ca. 13% compared to the average values of the four precedent academic years). However, it should be remarked that there was certain reticence (around 20% of students expressed their disagreement) to be evaluated by their peers. Overall, the students were satisfied with the workload that this new methodology entailed and stated that both the debate and the immediate feedback helped to reinforce the concepts described during the theory lessons within the context of the Chemical Engineering Degree program.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 2","pages":"714–721 714–721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforcing and maintaining an adequate dynamic in the classroom is a key aspect of the teaching–learning process. This work reports the use of Genially software aimed at improving students’ motivation and engagement within the course of Gaseous Effluent Treatment Technologies in the Chemical Engineering Degree. The evaluation of the implemented modifications was carried out through two different mechanisms to get the students’ opinions about the innovation: (i) the development of a specific survey instrument; (ii) the analysis of the activity scores achieved during the practical lessons. The results suggested that this proposal was favorably accepted by the students (with an acceptance rate above 95%, as shown by the answers from the specific survey), besides increasing the scores directly related to the topics in which it was applied (ca. 13% compared to the average values of the four precedent academic years). However, it should be remarked that there was certain reticence (around 20% of students expressed their disagreement) to be evaluated by their peers. Overall, the students were satisfied with the workload that this new methodology entailed and stated that both the debate and the immediate feedback helped to reinforce the concepts described during the theory lessons within the context of the Chemical Engineering Degree program.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为提高化学工程学位学习动力和动力的有效资源
在课堂上加强和保持充分的动态是教与学过程的一个关键方面。这项工作报告了通用软件的使用,旨在提高学生在化学工程学位的气体污水处理技术课程中的积极性和参与度。通过两种不同的机制对实施的修改进行评估,以获得学生对创新的意见:(i)开发特定的调查工具;(二)实践课活动得分分析。结果表明,该提案得到了学生的积极接受(从具体调查的答案中可以看出,录取率在95%以上),并且增加了与应用该提案的主题直接相关的分数(与前四个学年的平均值相比,约为13%)。然而,应该指出的是,有一定的沉默(约20%的学生表达了他们的反对意见)被同龄人评价。总的来说,学生们对这种新方法所带来的工作量感到满意,并表示辩论和即时反馈都有助于加强化学工程学位课程背景下理论课中描述的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information The Growth of Published Multisession Laboratory Experiment Articles in the Journal Comparative Dissolution Rates of Alcohols in Water via Laser Irradiation Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness of Pedagogical Innovations Involving Technology in Organic Chemistry Education in Developing Students’ Academic Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1