Machine Learning-based World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule for persons with Parkinson's disease

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Parkinsonism & related disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107316
Meng-Lin Lee , Gong-Hong Lin , Yi-Ching Wang , Shih-Chieh Lee , Ching-Lin Hsieh
{"title":"Machine Learning-based World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule for persons with Parkinson's disease","authors":"Meng-Lin Lee ,&nbsp;Gong-Hong Lin ,&nbsp;Yi-Ching Wang ,&nbsp;Shih-Chieh Lee ,&nbsp;Ching-Lin Hsieh","doi":"10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a well-known measure to assess disability in persons with Parkinson's disease (PD). The purpose of this study was to develop a short form of the WHODAS 2.0 for persons with PD using a machine learning-based methodology (ML-WHODAS) and to examine the efficiency (i.e., number of items needed to be administered) and validity of the ML-WHODAS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A secondary data analysis was performed. Data were randomly assigned to training datasets (80 %) and validation datasets (20 %). For developing the ML-WHODAS, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) regressor was used to select the most informative items from the training datasets, and then the final XGBoost model was generated. The efficiency, concurrent validity, and convergent validity of the ML-WHODAS were then examined using the validation dataset.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data from 1633 patients were randomly assigned into the training dataset (1306) and the validation dataset (327). Eighteen items were selected for the ML-WHODAS to reproduce 6 domain scores and one global score of the original WHODAS 2.0. In the validation dataset, the Pearson's coefficients r between the scores of the ML-WHODAS and WHODAS 2.0 were 0.97–0.99, indicating very high concurrent validity. Significant correlations were found regarding convergent validity of the domain and global scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The ML-WHODAS showed good efficiency and validity compared to the WHODAS 2.0 in persons with PD. The ML-WHODAS demonstrates its potential as an alternative to the WHODAS 2.0, though further validations (e.g., test-retest reliability and responsiveness) are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19970,"journal":{"name":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 107316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353802025000574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a well-known measure to assess disability in persons with Parkinson's disease (PD). The purpose of this study was to develop a short form of the WHODAS 2.0 for persons with PD using a machine learning-based methodology (ML-WHODAS) and to examine the efficiency (i.e., number of items needed to be administered) and validity of the ML-WHODAS.

Methods

A secondary data analysis was performed. Data were randomly assigned to training datasets (80 %) and validation datasets (20 %). For developing the ML-WHODAS, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) regressor was used to select the most informative items from the training datasets, and then the final XGBoost model was generated. The efficiency, concurrent validity, and convergent validity of the ML-WHODAS were then examined using the validation dataset.

Results

Data from 1633 patients were randomly assigned into the training dataset (1306) and the validation dataset (327). Eighteen items were selected for the ML-WHODAS to reproduce 6 domain scores and one global score of the original WHODAS 2.0. In the validation dataset, the Pearson's coefficients r between the scores of the ML-WHODAS and WHODAS 2.0 were 0.97–0.99, indicating very high concurrent validity. Significant correlations were found regarding convergent validity of the domain and global scores.

Conclusions

The ML-WHODAS showed good efficiency and validity compared to the WHODAS 2.0 in persons with PD. The ML-WHODAS demonstrates its potential as an alternative to the WHODAS 2.0, though further validations (e.g., test-retest reliability and responsiveness) are warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的世界卫生组织帕金森病患者残疾评估时间表
世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)是一项众所周知的评估帕金森病(PD)患者残疾的措施。本研究的目的是使用基于机器学习的方法(ML-WHODAS)开发PD患者WHODAS 2.0的简短形式,并检查ML-WHODAS的效率(即需要管理的项目数量)和有效性。方法进行二次资料分析。数据随机分配到训练数据集(80%)和验证数据集(20%)。在开发ML-WHODAS时,使用极端梯度增强(eXtreme Gradient Boosting, XGBoost)回归量从训练数据集中选择信息量最大的项目,然后生成最终的XGBoost模型。然后使用验证数据集检验ML-WHODAS的效率、并发效度和收敛效度。结果1633例患者的数据被随机分配到训练数据集(1306)和验证数据集(327)中。ML-WHODAS选取了18个条目,复制了原始WHODAS 2.0的6个域分数和1个全局分数。在验证数据集中,ML-WHODAS与WHODAS 2.0得分之间的Pearson’s系数r为0.97-0.99,表明并发效度很高。在领域和整体得分的收敛效度方面发现了显著的相关性。结论与WHODAS 2.0相比,ML-WHODAS在PD患者中具有较好的疗效和效度。ML-WHODAS显示了其作为WHODAS 2.0替代方案的潜力,但需要进一步验证(例如,测试-重测试的可靠性和响应性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinsonism & related disorders
Parkinsonism & related disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
292
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders publishes the results of basic and clinical research contributing to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of all neurodegenerative syndromes in which Parkinsonism, Essential Tremor or related movement disorders may be a feature. Regular features will include: Review Articles, Point of View articles, Full-length Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports and Letter to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Early-onset epileptic encephalopathy combined with cerebellar ataxia: A case report expanding the phenotypic spectrum of UBA5-related disorders. Early-onset parkinsonism with intellectual disability in an Italian family associated with a PTRHD1 variant. Frequency of dementia with lewy bodies in a large memory clinic in Colombia: Results from a 6-month cross-sectional study using the lewy body composite risk score. Deep brain stimulation beyond Motor control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sleep outcomes in Parkinson's disease. Susceptibility mapping of deep gray matter in Wilson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1