Cognitive measures predict falls in Parkinson's disease: Insights from the CYCLE-II cohort

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Parkinsonism & related disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107328
Saar Anis , Eric Zimmerman , A. Elizabeth Jansen , Ryan D. Kaya , Hubert H. Fernandez , Cielita Lopez-Lennon , Leland E. Dibble , Anson B. Rosenfeldt , Jay L. Alberts
{"title":"Cognitive measures predict falls in Parkinson's disease: Insights from the CYCLE-II cohort","authors":"Saar Anis ,&nbsp;Eric Zimmerman ,&nbsp;A. Elizabeth Jansen ,&nbsp;Ryan D. Kaya ,&nbsp;Hubert H. Fernandez ,&nbsp;Cielita Lopez-Lennon ,&nbsp;Leland E. Dibble ,&nbsp;Anson B. Rosenfeldt ,&nbsp;Jay L. Alberts","doi":"10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate prediction of falls in patients with Parkinson's disease (PWP) is crucial for effective prevention efforts. Historically, fall risk models have heavily relied on motor features, overlooking the vital cognitive-motor interplay essential for locomotion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Baseline assessments and year-long fall data from the CYClical Lower Extremity Exercise for Parkinson's disease II (CYCLE-II) trial's control group were utilized. A LASSO logistic regression model assessed thirty-seven demographic, motor, and cognitive variables to identify key fall predictors. To explore the practical implementation of predicting falls in a clinical setting, a second model was developed using a subset of nine candidate measures conducive for retrieval from electronic medical records. Models' accuracy was validated against Paul et al.'s 3-step fall prediction model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis included 123 participants (mean age 65.3 ± 8.3 years, 66 % males, mean disease duration 4.9 ± 4.1 years). Seventy-two participants (58.5 %) fell at least once; with 33.1 % occurring during walking, 34.4 % resulting in injuries. The initial model identified 8 predictors with an AUC of 0.68. The second model, incorporating disease duration and cognitive tests, achieved an AUC of 0.67, comparable to Paul et al.'s validation (AUC 0.66). Participants with poorer information processing and spatial memory were more prone to falling over the 12-month period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Impaired cognitive performance and longer disease duration were powerful predictors in identifying a future fall in PWP. The link between cognitive performance and potential for falling reinforces the strong interplay between gait and cognition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19970,"journal":{"name":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 107328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353802025000690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Accurate prediction of falls in patients with Parkinson's disease (PWP) is crucial for effective prevention efforts. Historically, fall risk models have heavily relied on motor features, overlooking the vital cognitive-motor interplay essential for locomotion.

Methods

Baseline assessments and year-long fall data from the CYClical Lower Extremity Exercise for Parkinson's disease II (CYCLE-II) trial's control group were utilized. A LASSO logistic regression model assessed thirty-seven demographic, motor, and cognitive variables to identify key fall predictors. To explore the practical implementation of predicting falls in a clinical setting, a second model was developed using a subset of nine candidate measures conducive for retrieval from electronic medical records. Models' accuracy was validated against Paul et al.'s 3-step fall prediction model.

Results

Analysis included 123 participants (mean age 65.3 ± 8.3 years, 66 % males, mean disease duration 4.9 ± 4.1 years). Seventy-two participants (58.5 %) fell at least once; with 33.1 % occurring during walking, 34.4 % resulting in injuries. The initial model identified 8 predictors with an AUC of 0.68. The second model, incorporating disease duration and cognitive tests, achieved an AUC of 0.67, comparable to Paul et al.'s validation (AUC 0.66). Participants with poorer information processing and spatial memory were more prone to falling over the 12-month period.

Conclusions

Impaired cognitive performance and longer disease duration were powerful predictors in identifying a future fall in PWP. The link between cognitive performance and potential for falling reinforces the strong interplay between gait and cognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinsonism & related disorders
Parkinsonism & related disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
292
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders publishes the results of basic and clinical research contributing to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of all neurodegenerative syndromes in which Parkinsonism, Essential Tremor or related movement disorders may be a feature. Regular features will include: Review Articles, Point of View articles, Full-length Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports and Letter to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Convergence insufficiency and Parkinson's disease progression Cognitive measures predict falls in Parkinson's disease: Insights from the CYCLE-II cohort Infantile-onset choreo-dystonia due to a novel homozygous truncating HPCA variant: A first report from India. TAOK1-related neurodevelopmental disorder: A new differential diagnosis for childhood-onset tremor!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1