In pursuit of the third mission: Exploring women's participation in academic engagement activities in sub-Saharan Africa

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103188
Afua Owusu-Kwarteng , Sarah Jack , Cynthia Forson , Olufunmilola (Lola) Dada
{"title":"In pursuit of the third mission: Exploring women's participation in academic engagement activities in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Afua Owusu-Kwarteng ,&nbsp;Sarah Jack ,&nbsp;Cynthia Forson ,&nbsp;Olufunmilola (Lola) Dada","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Across the globe, there is a growing expectation for academics to generate societal impact by pursuing a third mission alongside their teaching and research missions. Conceptualised as academic engagement (AE), extant research indicates that academics in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) may face challenges in participating in this activity due to existing institutional voids. Drawing on Bourdieu's practice theory and feminist perspectives on gender, work, and organisations, this article explores women researchers' participation in AE activities in six SSA countries: Zambia, Botswana, Ghana, Nigeria, Malawi, and Kenya. Through semi-structured interviews with 36 women researchers, we found that beyond institutional voids, gender plays a significant role in AE activities in SSA, influencing the women researchers we studied to engage in homophilous networking, embody masculinity, and enhance their competencies. Based on our findings, we argue that taking a micro-level perspective of AE activities in SSA is pertinent. Such a perspective, we found, empowers us to observe how the generation of societal impact through AE activities may trap women researchers (and other minority groups) into a cycle of low wages, limited career opportunities, and harmful working conditions that may not only affect their well-being, but also widen gender inequality in academia and the broader society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 103188"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across the globe, there is a growing expectation for academics to generate societal impact by pursuing a third mission alongside their teaching and research missions. Conceptualised as academic engagement (AE), extant research indicates that academics in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) may face challenges in participating in this activity due to existing institutional voids. Drawing on Bourdieu's practice theory and feminist perspectives on gender, work, and organisations, this article explores women researchers' participation in AE activities in six SSA countries: Zambia, Botswana, Ghana, Nigeria, Malawi, and Kenya. Through semi-structured interviews with 36 women researchers, we found that beyond institutional voids, gender plays a significant role in AE activities in SSA, influencing the women researchers we studied to engage in homophilous networking, embody masculinity, and enhance their competencies. Based on our findings, we argue that taking a micro-level perspective of AE activities in SSA is pertinent. Such a perspective, we found, empowers us to observe how the generation of societal impact through AE activities may trap women researchers (and other minority groups) into a cycle of low wages, limited career opportunities, and harmful working conditions that may not only affect their well-being, but also widen gender inequality in academia and the broader society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三项任务:探索撒哈拉以南非洲地区妇女参与学术活动的情况
在全球范围内,越来越多的人期望学术界在他们的教学和研究任务之外,通过追求第三种使命来产生社会影响。现有的研究表明,由于现有的制度空白,撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)的学者在参与这一活动时可能面临挑战。本文借鉴布迪厄关于性别、工作和组织的实践理论和女权主义观点,探讨了六个SSA国家(赞比亚、博茨瓦纳、加纳、尼日利亚、马拉维和肯尼亚)中女性研究人员参与AE活动的情况。通过对36名女性研究人员的半结构化访谈,我们发现除了制度空白之外,性别在SSA的AE活动中也起着重要作用,影响着我们研究的女性研究人员参与同性恋网络,体现男性气质,提高她们的能力。基于我们的研究结果,我们认为在SSA中采取微观层面的AE活动观点是相关的。我们发现,这样的观点使我们能够观察到,通过AE活动产生的社会影响如何使女性研究人员(和其他少数群体)陷入低工资、有限的职业机会和有害的工作条件的循环,这不仅会影响她们的福祉,还会扩大学术界和更广泛的社会中的性别不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Innovating during disruption: An assessment of firms’ knowledge absorption from suppliers across disruptive and sustaining technologies Innovation failure, technology commercialization, and ambidexterity: Translating failure into success When employees meet gen AI: The double-edged effects of AI attitude on creativity Board networks and firm's digital transformation: Evidence from China “Blockchain for good” – but good for whom and when?: Studies on the impacts of context and temporality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1