Testing profit maximization in the U.S. cement industry

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106773
Christopher P. Chambers , John Rehbeck
{"title":"Testing profit maximization in the U.S. cement industry","authors":"Christopher P. Chambers ,&nbsp;John Rehbeck","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motivated by a commonly held intuition that the cement industry is not competitive, we perform a revealed preference test to examine whether the United States cement industry could have been profit maximizing from 1993–1998. Rather than looking at technical efficiency, we create and examine a measure of necessary competitive price taking profit loss of the cement industry using information on aggregate output and aggregate inputs. One contribution of this paper is to compile a comprehensive dataset of United States cement producers, cement production, cement inputs data, and input/output prices. In particular, we combine data found in the U.S. Mines Geological Yearbooks, the Portland Cement Association, the American Energy Review, and the St. Louis Federal Reserve. Assuming technology is static, non-negative profits for firms, and a priori knowledge of inputs/outputs, we find the U.S. cement industry had a necessary competitive price taking profit loss of 755.1 million 1996 dollars.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 106773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124003871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivated by a commonly held intuition that the cement industry is not competitive, we perform a revealed preference test to examine whether the United States cement industry could have been profit maximizing from 1993–1998. Rather than looking at technical efficiency, we create and examine a measure of necessary competitive price taking profit loss of the cement industry using information on aggregate output and aggregate inputs. One contribution of this paper is to compile a comprehensive dataset of United States cement producers, cement production, cement inputs data, and input/output prices. In particular, we combine data found in the U.S. Mines Geological Yearbooks, the Portland Cement Association, the American Energy Review, and the St. Louis Federal Reserve. Assuming technology is static, non-negative profits for firms, and a priori knowledge of inputs/outputs, we find the U.S. cement industry had a necessary competitive price taking profit loss of 755.1 million 1996 dollars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检验美国水泥行业的利润最大化
出于一种普遍持有的直觉,即水泥行业不具有竞争力,我们执行了一个揭示偏好测试,以检查美国水泥行业是否可以从1993-1998年实现利润最大化。我们不是着眼于技术效率,而是利用总产出和总投入的信息,创建并检验了考虑水泥行业利润损失的必要竞争价格的衡量标准。本文的一个贡献是汇编了美国水泥生产商、水泥产量、水泥投入数据和投入/产出价格的综合数据集。特别是,我们结合了美国矿山地质年鉴、波特兰水泥协会、美国能源评论和圣路易斯联邦储备银行的数据。假设技术是静态的,企业的非负利润,以及先验的投入/产出知识,我们发现美国水泥行业具有必要的竞争性价格,利润损失为7.551亿1996美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Consumer coordination and optimal pricing under network externalities Paternalism after behavioral economics Inflation expectations and cognitive uncertainty Measuring preferences over temporal profiles✰ Saving motives over the life-cycle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1