{"title":"Testing profit maximization in the U.S. cement industry","authors":"Christopher P. Chambers , John Rehbeck","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motivated by a commonly held intuition that the cement industry is not competitive, we perform a revealed preference test to examine whether the United States cement industry could have been profit maximizing from 1993–1998. Rather than looking at technical efficiency, we create and examine a measure of necessary competitive price taking profit loss of the cement industry using information on aggregate output and aggregate inputs. One contribution of this paper is to compile a comprehensive dataset of United States cement producers, cement production, cement inputs data, and input/output prices. In particular, we combine data found in the U.S. Mines Geological Yearbooks, the Portland Cement Association, the American Energy Review, and the St. Louis Federal Reserve. Assuming technology is static, non-negative profits for firms, and a priori knowledge of inputs/outputs, we find the U.S. cement industry had a necessary competitive price taking profit loss of 755.1 million 1996 dollars.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 106773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124003871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Motivated by a commonly held intuition that the cement industry is not competitive, we perform a revealed preference test to examine whether the United States cement industry could have been profit maximizing from 1993–1998. Rather than looking at technical efficiency, we create and examine a measure of necessary competitive price taking profit loss of the cement industry using information on aggregate output and aggregate inputs. One contribution of this paper is to compile a comprehensive dataset of United States cement producers, cement production, cement inputs data, and input/output prices. In particular, we combine data found in the U.S. Mines Geological Yearbooks, the Portland Cement Association, the American Energy Review, and the St. Louis Federal Reserve. Assuming technology is static, non-negative profits for firms, and a priori knowledge of inputs/outputs, we find the U.S. cement industry had a necessary competitive price taking profit loss of 755.1 million 1996 dollars.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.