Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101200
Yuzi Zhou RN, MAdvN , Pauline Wong RN, PhD , Angelique Clarke RN, MN (critical care) , Rebecca J. Jarden RN, PhD , Wendy Pollock RN, PhD, RM, FACCCN
{"title":"Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study","authors":"Yuzi Zhou RN, MAdvN ,&nbsp;Pauline Wong RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Angelique Clarke RN, MN (critical care) ,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Jarden RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Wendy Pollock RN, PhD, RM, FACCCN","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intensive care units are characterised as high-stress work environments that may negatively affect nurses’ wellbeing. Employer-provided support has a crucial role in reducing burnout and improving wellbeing.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to examine wellbeing supports routinely offered by employers of nurses working in intensive care units and examine the relationships amongst perceived organisational support, wellbeing, and burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study of nurses working in Australian intensive care units was conducted from 4 to 19 September 2023. A web-based survey was distributed via the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses and social media, with snowball sampling. Validated tools for perceived organisational support, subjective wellbeing, and burnout were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 668 responses, 632 met inclusion criteria for analysis (94.6%). Education and training were the most common supports recognised by nurses (63.4%, <em>n</em> = 401). The most helpful support was childcare assistance (M = 3.17, standard deviation [SD] = 1.38). Higher levels of perceived organisational support were associated with better subjective wellbeing (<em>r</em> = 0.20; p &lt; 0.001). Perceived organisational support was higher for nurses without burnout (M = 4.15, SD = 0.89) than for those with burnout (M = 3.64, SD = 0.85; t [625] = 7.43, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, two-tailed). For every one-point increase in the mean value of perceived organisational support, nurses were 56% less likely to report experiencing burnout than those who perceived lower organisational support (B = −0.81, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, odds ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.35–0.56). The strongest predictor of reporting burnout was engaging in an education/clinical support job role (B = 0.88, <em>p</em> = 0.04, odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–5.60).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Nurses working in Australian intensive care units perceived employer-provided wellbeing support to be inadequate. Perceived organisational support is a modifiable independent predictor of burnout, suggesting that employers need to work with nurses to improve wellbeing supports.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>Not registered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 101200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S103673142500030X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intensive care units are characterised as high-stress work environments that may negatively affect nurses’ wellbeing. Employer-provided support has a crucial role in reducing burnout and improving wellbeing.

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine wellbeing supports routinely offered by employers of nurses working in intensive care units and examine the relationships amongst perceived organisational support, wellbeing, and burnout.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of nurses working in Australian intensive care units was conducted from 4 to 19 September 2023. A web-based survey was distributed via the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses and social media, with snowball sampling. Validated tools for perceived organisational support, subjective wellbeing, and burnout were used.

Results

Of 668 responses, 632 met inclusion criteria for analysis (94.6%). Education and training were the most common supports recognised by nurses (63.4%, n = 401). The most helpful support was childcare assistance (M = 3.17, standard deviation [SD] = 1.38). Higher levels of perceived organisational support were associated with better subjective wellbeing (r = 0.20; p < 0.001). Perceived organisational support was higher for nurses without burnout (M = 4.15, SD = 0.89) than for those with burnout (M = 3.64, SD = 0.85; t [625] = 7.43, p < 0.001, two-tailed). For every one-point increase in the mean value of perceived organisational support, nurses were 56% less likely to report experiencing burnout than those who perceived lower organisational support (B = −0.81, p < 0.001, odds ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.35–0.56). The strongest predictor of reporting burnout was engaging in an education/clinical support job role (B = 0.88, p = 0.04, odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–5.60).

Conclusions

Nurses working in Australian intensive care units perceived employer-provided wellbeing support to be inadequate. Perceived organisational support is a modifiable independent predictor of burnout, suggesting that employers need to work with nurses to improve wellbeing supports.

Registration

Not registered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Wellbeing as perceived and experienced by intensive care unit nurses: An interpretive qualitative analysis Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study Understanding crisis needs among family caregivers of patients in critical care: A qualitative analysis Antidepressant use, but not polypharmacy, is associated with worse outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in older people “Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1