Basil and Swiss chard: Edible crops for use in floating treatment wetlands improving agricultural runoff

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107546
Clare Escamilla , David R. Tyrpak , William H.J. Strosnider , Sarah A. White
{"title":"Basil and Swiss chard: Edible crops for use in floating treatment wetlands improving agricultural runoff","authors":"Clare Escamilla ,&nbsp;David R. Tyrpak ,&nbsp;William H.J. Strosnider ,&nbsp;Sarah A. White","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The plant species established within floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) influence nutrient removal efficiency. To enhance adoption of FTWs by agricultural producers, both economic and ecological benefits from FTWs are needed to increase their use within irrigation retention reservoirs. Thus, we ascertained the feasibility of growing food crops in FTWs by evaluating two edible plant species to determine survivability and nutrient accumulation when grown in FTWs. We quantified plant growth (at saleable/harvestable size), nutrient uptake in root and shoot tissues, and overall nutrient removal efficiency of sweet basil (<em>Ocimum basilicum</em>) and Swiss chard (<em>Beta vulgaris</em>) over a six- or eight-week period, respectively, with exposures to simulated irrigation return flow with moderate or high concentrations of nutrients present. Two cultivars of basil were mixed within each mesocosm to create a mixed planting design across the two fertilizer treatments and two types of Swiss chard (species and ‘Bright Lights’) were evaluated separately. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal efficiencies were calculated for a 7-day hydraulic retention time. Growth and nutrient removal efficiency were similar within each species. The average N removal rate was 0.077 and 0.19 g·m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> for basil and 0.16 and 0.30 g·m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> for the Swiss chard for moderate and high nutrient treatments, respectively. The average P removal rate was 0.015 and 0.036 g·m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> for basil and 0.019 and 0.043 g·m<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup> for Swiss chard for moderate and high nutrient treatments, respectively. Most nutrients were fixed within plant shoots. Multiple harvests throughout the growing season could potentially lead to increased profits and nutrient uptake. Additional research is needed to determine if higher nutrient reductions can be achieved through additional harvests, greater planting densities, or increased percent cover. Both basil and Swiss chard are promising plant selections for FTWs, pairing nutrient removal with marketable crop production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 107546"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The plant species established within floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) influence nutrient removal efficiency. To enhance adoption of FTWs by agricultural producers, both economic and ecological benefits from FTWs are needed to increase their use within irrigation retention reservoirs. Thus, we ascertained the feasibility of growing food crops in FTWs by evaluating two edible plant species to determine survivability and nutrient accumulation when grown in FTWs. We quantified plant growth (at saleable/harvestable size), nutrient uptake in root and shoot tissues, and overall nutrient removal efficiency of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) and Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris) over a six- or eight-week period, respectively, with exposures to simulated irrigation return flow with moderate or high concentrations of nutrients present. Two cultivars of basil were mixed within each mesocosm to create a mixed planting design across the two fertilizer treatments and two types of Swiss chard (species and ‘Bright Lights’) were evaluated separately. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal efficiencies were calculated for a 7-day hydraulic retention time. Growth and nutrient removal efficiency were similar within each species. The average N removal rate was 0.077 and 0.19 g·m−2 day−1 for basil and 0.16 and 0.30 g·m−2 day−1 for the Swiss chard for moderate and high nutrient treatments, respectively. The average P removal rate was 0.015 and 0.036 g·m−2 day−1 for basil and 0.019 and 0.043 g·m−2 day−1 for Swiss chard for moderate and high nutrient treatments, respectively. Most nutrients were fixed within plant shoots. Multiple harvests throughout the growing season could potentially lead to increased profits and nutrient uptake. Additional research is needed to determine if higher nutrient reductions can be achieved through additional harvests, greater planting densities, or increased percent cover. Both basil and Swiss chard are promising plant selections for FTWs, pairing nutrient removal with marketable crop production.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗勒和瑞士甜菜:用于浮动处理湿地改善农业径流的食用作物
漂浮处理湿地内的植物种类影响营养物的去除效率。为了提高农业生产者对灌溉水的采用,需要从灌溉水的经济效益和生态效益两方面来增加灌溉水在蓄水水库中的使用。因此,我们通过评估两种可食用植物来确定在FTWs中种植粮食作物的可行性,以确定在FTWs中种植时的生存能力和营养积累。我们分别在6周或8周的时间内量化了甜罗勒(Ocimum basilicum)和瑞士甜菜(Beta vulgaris)的植物生长(可销售/可收获尺寸)、根和芽组织的营养吸收以及总体营养去除效率,并暴露于中等或高浓度营养物质的模拟灌溉回流中。在每个中胚层中混合两种罗勒品种,以创建跨两种肥料处理的混合种植设计,并分别评估两种类型的瑞士甜菜(物种和‘ Bright Lights ’)。在7天的水力滞留时间内,计算了氮(N)和磷(P)的去除效率。各种属的生长和养分去除效率相似。在中等和高营养处理下,罗勒的平均氮去除率分别为0.077和0.19 g·m−2 day−1,甜菜的平均氮去除率分别为0.16和0.30 g·m−2 day−1。在中等和高营养处理下,罗勒的平均P去除率分别为0.015和0.036 g·m−2 day−1,甜菜的平均P去除率分别为0.019和0.043 g·m−2 day−1。大部分营养物质被固定在植物的芽中。整个生长季节的多次收获可能会增加利润和养分吸收。需要进一步的研究来确定是否可以通过增加收成、增加种植密度或增加覆盖率来实现更高的营养减少。罗勒和瑞士甜菜都是FTWs有希望的植物选择,将营养去除与适销作物生产相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing spontaneous plant diversity and insect herbivory on extensive green roofs Enhancing agricultural soil fertility and improving crop yield with the sediment dredged from the treatment wetland Modeling cumulative and spatially-varying nitrate removal from multiple floodplain restoration projects in a 4th-order river channel network Long-term assessment of chestnut live cribwalls deterioration using drilling resistance measurements Enhancing urban wastewater treatment through nature-based solutions: The role of biofilm–plant development in subsurface retention of multiple solutes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1