The impact of sky conditions on gross primary production and methane flux from different rice paddies

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Atmospheric Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121098
Tingting Zhu , Yanlian Zhou , Weimin Ju
{"title":"The impact of sky conditions on gross primary production and methane flux from different rice paddies","authors":"Tingting Zhu ,&nbsp;Yanlian Zhou ,&nbsp;Weimin Ju","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increase of diffuse radiation fraction has been reported to greatly impact carbon uptake in agroecosystems. However, it is unclear how radiation components affected methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission. Based on eddy covariance measurement from six sites, the effects of sky conditions on gross primary productivity (GPP) and CH<sub>4</sub> emission were investigated at half-hourly and daily scales. The results showed diurnal patterns of GPP were similar under all sky conditions, while CH<sub>4</sub> emission displayed irregular unimodal curves with greater fluctuations under different sky conditions. GPP responded to the changing radiation more efficiently under overcast conditions than under sunny conditions, whereas CH<sub>4</sub> emission under sunny conditions was higher at the same radiation levels. Parameters describing GPP and CH<sub>4</sub> emission varied across sites and sky conditions. The maximum photosynthetic rate and CH<sub>4</sub> rate at turning point under cloudy and overcast skies were lower than those under sunny conditions. The values of initial light use efficiency from GPP and CH<sub>4</sub> emission were opposite with the increase of diffuse radiation fraction, respectively. Soil moisture, temperature (Ta), vapor pressure deficit, direct, and diffuse radiation (<em>R</em><sub>dif</sub>) were responsible for the variations of GPP and CH<sub>4</sub> emission under different skies, CH<sub>4</sub> emission depended heavily on GPP and Ta under the inhibition of <em>R</em><sub>dif</sub>. This study implies that the direct effects of sky conditions on GPP were greater than those on CH<sub>4</sub> emission and should be paid more attention in ecosystem carbon cycle models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"346 ","pages":"Article 121098"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231025000731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increase of diffuse radiation fraction has been reported to greatly impact carbon uptake in agroecosystems. However, it is unclear how radiation components affected methane (CH4) emission. Based on eddy covariance measurement from six sites, the effects of sky conditions on gross primary productivity (GPP) and CH4 emission were investigated at half-hourly and daily scales. The results showed diurnal patterns of GPP were similar under all sky conditions, while CH4 emission displayed irregular unimodal curves with greater fluctuations under different sky conditions. GPP responded to the changing radiation more efficiently under overcast conditions than under sunny conditions, whereas CH4 emission under sunny conditions was higher at the same radiation levels. Parameters describing GPP and CH4 emission varied across sites and sky conditions. The maximum photosynthetic rate and CH4 rate at turning point under cloudy and overcast skies were lower than those under sunny conditions. The values of initial light use efficiency from GPP and CH4 emission were opposite with the increase of diffuse radiation fraction, respectively. Soil moisture, temperature (Ta), vapor pressure deficit, direct, and diffuse radiation (Rdif) were responsible for the variations of GPP and CH4 emission under different skies, CH4 emission depended heavily on GPP and Ta under the inhibition of Rdif. This study implies that the direct effects of sky conditions on GPP were greater than those on CH4 emission and should be paid more attention in ecosystem carbon cycle models.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Insights into bacteria characteristics and potential pathogen in rural indoor households in Fenwei Plain, China Weather history-based parameterization of the G-93 isoprene emission formula for the tropical plant Ficus septica Explainable deep learning hybrid modeling framework for total suspended particles concentrations prediction Assessment of recent mercury trends associated with the National Atmospheric Deposition Program Mercury Litterfall Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1