Dark childhood, dark personality: Relations between experiences of child abuse and dark tetrad traits

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113089
Manuel Galán , David Pineda , Pilar Rico-Bordera , Jose A. Piqueras , Peter Muris
{"title":"Dark childhood, dark personality: Relations between experiences of child abuse and dark tetrad traits","authors":"Manuel Galán ,&nbsp;David Pineda ,&nbsp;Pilar Rico-Bordera ,&nbsp;Jose A. Piqueras ,&nbsp;Peter Muris","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extensive literature connects the Dark personality traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism—with antisocial behaviours, but less is known about the origins of these traits. This study examines the relations between childhood abuse and Dark Tetrad traits. A cross-sectional retrospective research design was used involving a sample of 372 non-clinical adult participants who completed self-report measures assessing non-violent and violent parental discipline tactics and the Dark Tetrad traits. Correlations showed that all parental discipline tactics were positively related to Dark Tetrad traits. Regression analyses revealed that psychological aggression uniquely and positively predicted psychopathy and sadism, while severe assault emerged as a unique positive predictor of Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy. Nonviolent discipline and corporal punishment or minor assault did not make a significant contribution to any of the dark traits. In conclusion, these findings suggest a modest but significant role of an adverse childhood environment in shaping dark personality traits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 113089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive literature connects the Dark personality traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism—with antisocial behaviours, but less is known about the origins of these traits. This study examines the relations between childhood abuse and Dark Tetrad traits. A cross-sectional retrospective research design was used involving a sample of 372 non-clinical adult participants who completed self-report measures assessing non-violent and violent parental discipline tactics and the Dark Tetrad traits. Correlations showed that all parental discipline tactics were positively related to Dark Tetrad traits. Regression analyses revealed that psychological aggression uniquely and positively predicted psychopathy and sadism, while severe assault emerged as a unique positive predictor of Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy. Nonviolent discipline and corporal punishment or minor assault did not make a significant contribution to any of the dark traits. In conclusion, these findings suggest a modest but significant role of an adverse childhood environment in shaping dark personality traits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑暗的童年,黑暗的人格:儿童虐待经历与黑暗四人格特质的关系
大量文献将黑暗人格特征——自恋、马基雅维利主义、精神病和虐待狂——与反社会行为联系起来,但对这些特征的起源却知之甚少。本研究探讨童年虐待与黑暗四分体特质之间的关系。采用横断面回顾性研究设计,包括372名非临床成年参与者,他们完成了评估非暴力和暴力父母管教策略和黑暗四分体特征的自我报告测量。相关分析表明,所有亲本管教策略与黑暗四分体性状呈正相关。回归分析显示,心理攻击是精神病和虐待狂的独特正向预测因子,而严重攻击是马基雅维利主义、自恋和精神病的独特正向预测因子。非暴力的纪律、体罚或轻微的攻击对任何黑暗特征都没有显著的影响。总之,这些发现表明,不良的童年环境在塑造黑暗人格特征方面起着适度但重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Moral foundations in the 2020s: Advancements in measurement, genetics, brain science, and real-world impact Interpersonal stressors, interpersonal sensitivity, and loneliness among college students: Disentangling between- and within-person associations Sociosexuality in men and women: Considering core self-judgments and (im)moral orientations Individual differences in adolescents' digital well-being: How perceived stress, fear of missing out, and self-control interact in daily life Is consideration of future consequences consistent across specific domains? A latent profile analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1