Intelligent decision support framework for assessment of alternative vehicle technologies in transportation system: A sustainable approach toward environmental remedy

IF 4.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100472
Ibrahim Alrashdi , Ahmed M. Ali , Karam M. Sallam , Mohamed Abdel-Basset
{"title":"Intelligent decision support framework for assessment of alternative vehicle technologies in transportation system: A sustainable approach toward environmental remedy","authors":"Ibrahim Alrashdi ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Ali ,&nbsp;Karam M. Sallam ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdel-Basset","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transportation system has the most considerable negative impacts on the environment due to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, so various governments seek to reduce GHG emissions by using the best alternative vehicle technologies in the transportation system. This paper presents a framework for selecting the best alternative vehicle technology in Egypt to reduce the emission of GHG toward sustainability. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with various conflicting criteria. This paper uses two MCDM methods: stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and root assessment method (RAM). This study extends the SWARA and RAM methods under single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs). The SVN-SWARA method is used to compute the criteria weights, and the SVN-RAM method is used to rank the alternatives. This study used seven main criteria, 40 sub-criteria, and 12 alternative vehicle technologies. The results in weights of criteria show that social criterion has the highest importance, and the market criterion has the lowest importance. The results in the rank of alternatives show the Electric vehicles (alternative) are the best choice for GHG emission reduction and for achieving sustainability in the transportation system in Egypt. The sensitivity and comparative analysis showed that the rank of alternatives is stable under different scenarios and that the proposed methodology is effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100472"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825000425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transportation system has the most considerable negative impacts on the environment due to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, so various governments seek to reduce GHG emissions by using the best alternative vehicle technologies in the transportation system. This paper presents a framework for selecting the best alternative vehicle technology in Egypt to reduce the emission of GHG toward sustainability. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with various conflicting criteria. This paper uses two MCDM methods: stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and root assessment method (RAM). This study extends the SWARA and RAM methods under single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs). The SVN-SWARA method is used to compute the criteria weights, and the SVN-RAM method is used to rank the alternatives. This study used seven main criteria, 40 sub-criteria, and 12 alternative vehicle technologies. The results in weights of criteria show that social criterion has the highest importance, and the market criterion has the lowest importance. The results in the rank of alternatives show the Electric vehicles (alternative) are the best choice for GHG emission reduction and for achieving sustainability in the transportation system in Egypt. The sensitivity and comparative analysis showed that the rank of alternatives is stable under different scenarios and that the proposed methodology is effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交通系统中替代车辆技术评估的智能决策支持框架:一种可持续的环境补救方法
由于温室气体(GHG)排放,交通系统对环境的负面影响最为显著,因此各国政府寻求通过在交通系统中使用最佳替代车辆技术来减少温室气体排放。本文提出了在埃及选择最佳替代车辆技术的框架,以减少温室气体的可持续排放。多准则决策(MCDM)用于处理各种相互冲突的决策准则。本文采用了两种MCDM方法:逐步权重评价比分析法(SWARA)和根评价法(RAM)。本研究扩展了单值嗜中性集(SVNSs)下的SWARA和RAM方法。采用svm - swara方法计算标准权重,采用svm - ram方法对备选方案进行排序。这项研究使用了7个主要标准,40个次要标准和12种替代车辆技术。各指标权重分析结果表明,社会指标的重要性最高,市场指标的重要性最低。替代方案的排名结果表明,电动汽车(替代方案)是减少温室气体排放和实现埃及交通系统可持续性的最佳选择。灵敏度分析和对比分析表明,在不同情景下,备选方案的排序是稳定的,该方法是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of climate change anxiety and social media information overload on unusual purchase behavior Why direct payments are more effective for combatting poverty than fair prices Exploring the role of media in climate change awareness and adaptation among university students in Islamabad, Pakistan Sustainable leather processing: A critical review of emerging green technologies and practices The impact mechanism of ESG ratings on firm value: An empirical study based on the multi-period difference-in-differences approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1