Performance evaluation method for different clustering techniques

IF 4.9 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE Computers & Electrical Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110132
John Enriquez-Loja, Bryan Castillo-Pérez, Xavier Serrano-Guerrero, Antonio Barragán-Escandón
{"title":"Performance evaluation method for different clustering techniques","authors":"John Enriquez-Loja,&nbsp;Bryan Castillo-Pérez,&nbsp;Xavier Serrano-Guerrero,&nbsp;Antonio Barragán-Escandón","doi":"10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive methodology to objectively evaluate various clustering techniques applied to electrical demand profiles (EDPs). The effectiveness of Self-Organizing Maps (SOM), Fuzzy C-Means (FCM), and Hierarchical Clustering (HC) is analyzed, revealing that these methods achieve anomalous value percentages below 17.1%. The proposed approach includes a statistical framework based on confidence intervals to classify data as typical or atypical, thereby facilitating the selection of the most appropriate clustering technique based on the characteristics of the dataset. To evaluate the methodology, an analysis of probability distributions is used, comparing it with three internal validation techniques through the implementation of specific criteria. These metrics provide insight into the dispersion and distribution of the EDPs, allowing for a robust evaluation of how variations in data impact clustering outcomes. The results indicate that the SOM, FCM and HC techniques exhibit strong adaptability to different patterns of variability, making them suitable for diverse applications in energy management. This research contributes valuable tools for optimizing the classification of EDPs, enhancing the understanding of consumption behaviors in the electricity sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50630,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Electrical Engineering","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 110132"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045790625000758","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive methodology to objectively evaluate various clustering techniques applied to electrical demand profiles (EDPs). The effectiveness of Self-Organizing Maps (SOM), Fuzzy C-Means (FCM), and Hierarchical Clustering (HC) is analyzed, revealing that these methods achieve anomalous value percentages below 17.1%. The proposed approach includes a statistical framework based on confidence intervals to classify data as typical or atypical, thereby facilitating the selection of the most appropriate clustering technique based on the characteristics of the dataset. To evaluate the methodology, an analysis of probability distributions is used, comparing it with three internal validation techniques through the implementation of specific criteria. These metrics provide insight into the dispersion and distribution of the EDPs, allowing for a robust evaluation of how variations in data impact clustering outcomes. The results indicate that the SOM, FCM and HC techniques exhibit strong adaptability to different patterns of variability, making them suitable for diverse applications in energy management. This research contributes valuable tools for optimizing the classification of EDPs, enhancing the understanding of consumption behaviors in the electricity sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同聚类技术的性能评价方法
本研究提出了一种全面的方法来客观地评估应用于电力需求曲线(EDPs)的各种聚类技术。分析了自组织图(SOM)、模糊c均值(FCM)和层次聚类(HC)的有效性,发现这些方法的异常值百分比低于17.1%。该方法包括一个基于置信区间的统计框架,将数据分类为典型或非典型,从而便于根据数据集的特征选择最合适的聚类技术。为了评估方法,使用了概率分布的分析,通过实施特定标准将其与三种内部验证技术进行比较。这些指标提供了对edp的分散和分布的洞察,允许对数据变化如何影响聚类结果进行可靠的评估。结果表明,SOM、FCM和HC技术对不同的变异性模式具有较强的适应性,适合于能源管理中的多种应用。本研究为优化edp分类提供了有价值的工具,增强了对电力部门消费行为的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Electrical Engineering
Computers & Electrical Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
661
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The impact of computers has nowhere been more revolutionary than in electrical engineering. The design, analysis, and operation of electrical and electronic systems are now dominated by computers, a transformation that has been motivated by the natural ease of interface between computers and electrical systems, and the promise of spectacular improvements in speed and efficiency. Published since 1973, Computers & Electrical Engineering provides rapid publication of topical research into the integration of computer technology and computational techniques with electrical and electronic systems. The journal publishes papers featuring novel implementations of computers and computational techniques in areas like signal and image processing, high-performance computing, parallel processing, and communications. Special attention will be paid to papers describing innovative architectures, algorithms, and software tools.
期刊最新文献
Scalable decentralized prognostics for industrial systems under data heterogeneity Mango-Mamba and VN-MangoLeaf: A lightweight Mamba model and New Dataset for Mango leaf disease classification On the performance of cascaded RISs-aided hybrid PLC/WLC systems with SWIPT Advancements and challenges in deepfake medical imaging: generation and detection techniques Trust scoring algorithms for zero trust-based software-defined perimeter architectures: A systematic literature review of advancements, challenges, and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1