Preoperative vs Postoperative Patient Outcome and Recovery Expectations of Total Joint Arthroplasty

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Today Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2025.101626
Siddhartha Dandamudi BBA , Kyleen Jan MD , Madelyn Malvitz BS , Anne DeBenedetti MSc , Omar Behery MD, MPH , Brett R. Levine MD, MS
{"title":"Preoperative vs Postoperative Patient Outcome and Recovery Expectations of Total Joint Arthroplasty","authors":"Siddhartha Dandamudi BBA ,&nbsp;Kyleen Jan MD ,&nbsp;Madelyn Malvitz BS ,&nbsp;Anne DeBenedetti MSc ,&nbsp;Omar Behery MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Brett R. Levine MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patient satisfaction with total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains a challenge, with up to 20% of patients expressing dissatisfaction despite good clinical outcomes. This study aims to assess patient expectations and experiences prior to and after undergoing a primary TJA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 13-question survey assessing patient expectations around surgical risks, logistics, physical therapy (PT), and pain was distributed in the clinics of multiple surgeons at an academic center. Each patient was categorized as either preoperative or postoperative, with similar questions for both groups. No identifying information was collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred eight preoperative and 344 postoperative responses were collected. Preoperatively, 91.3% of patients felt they had enough time to ask questions compared to 98.5% (<em>P</em> = .01) postoperatively. Preoperative patients named risks of TJA more accurately (<em>P</em> &lt; .00001). Expectations of long-term pain differed: 48.3% of preoperative patients expected no pain and 1.7% expected to be unable to move; postoperatively, 7.3% (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001) reported no pain and 10.3% (<em>P</em> = .03) were unable to move; 17.3% of patients finished PT within 2 weeks, compared to 1.7% who believed this was possible (<em>P</em> =.0027). A total of 73.1% of postoperative patients requested additional weeks of PT. Only 52.1% or patients had a long-term follow-up plan in place.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Expectations vary in patients undergoing TJA. Preoperative patients may have unrealistic expectations regarding postoperative pain and mobility. The need for more PT and the lack of a long-term follow-up plan highlight the importance of comprehensive perioperative communication to align expectations and potentially improve satisfaction and follow-up compliance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101626"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patient satisfaction with total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains a challenge, with up to 20% of patients expressing dissatisfaction despite good clinical outcomes. This study aims to assess patient expectations and experiences prior to and after undergoing a primary TJA.

Methods

A 13-question survey assessing patient expectations around surgical risks, logistics, physical therapy (PT), and pain was distributed in the clinics of multiple surgeons at an academic center. Each patient was categorized as either preoperative or postoperative, with similar questions for both groups. No identifying information was collected.

Results

One hundred eight preoperative and 344 postoperative responses were collected. Preoperatively, 91.3% of patients felt they had enough time to ask questions compared to 98.5% (P = .01) postoperatively. Preoperative patients named risks of TJA more accurately (P < .00001). Expectations of long-term pain differed: 48.3% of preoperative patients expected no pain and 1.7% expected to be unable to move; postoperatively, 7.3% (P < .0001) reported no pain and 10.3% (P = .03) were unable to move; 17.3% of patients finished PT within 2 weeks, compared to 1.7% who believed this was possible (P =.0027). A total of 73.1% of postoperative patients requested additional weeks of PT. Only 52.1% or patients had a long-term follow-up plan in place.

Conclusions

Expectations vary in patients undergoing TJA. Preoperative patients may have unrealistic expectations regarding postoperative pain and mobility. The need for more PT and the lack of a long-term follow-up plan highlight the importance of comprehensive perioperative communication to align expectations and potentially improve satisfaction and follow-up compliance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Robotic-assisted Conversion of Arthrodesis to Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Sequential Knee and Hip Arthroplasty in a Patient With Pfeifer-Weber-Christian Disease Femoral Nail and Cement Static Spacer Technique for the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Knee Infection Understanding Hip Pain Through Social Media: An Initial Overview of an International Web-Based Survey Reply to "Comment on: A Contemporary Analysis of Discharge Disposition Following Total Joint Arthroplasty"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1