Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia

Sambo Pheap , Alexis Thoumazeau , Jun Murase , Vang Seng , Jean-Pierre Sarthou , Veng Sar , Linda Kimbo , Soklin Kheam , Pheakdey Chan , Pao Srean , Samrith Leang , Lyda Hok , Florent Tivet
{"title":"Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia","authors":"Sambo Pheap ,&nbsp;Alexis Thoumazeau ,&nbsp;Jun Murase ,&nbsp;Vang Seng ,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Sarthou ,&nbsp;Veng Sar ,&nbsp;Linda Kimbo ,&nbsp;Soklin Kheam ,&nbsp;Pheakdey Chan ,&nbsp;Pao Srean ,&nbsp;Samrith Leang ,&nbsp;Lyda Hok ,&nbsp;Florent Tivet","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil fertility depletion is a major challenge for annual rainfed cropping systems in the northwestern region of Cambodia which has recently undergone rapid agrarian changes. On-farm impacts of conventional tillage and Conservation Agriculture-based practices (CT and CA respectively) of maize cultivation on soil health along with agronomic and economic performances were compared. The experiment was set up in 2020 comparing CT and CA with one cover crop (CAS) and CA with a mix of three cover crops (CAM). Soil health was assessed at the end of the cropping cycle using Biofunctool®. Agronomic performances including cover crops and a cash crop (maize) along with intermediate consumption were recorded in 2021 and 2022. Selected components of soil health, agronomic and economic performances were used for multi-criteria analysis. On this Mollisols, SHI was positively impacted under CA (15% and 6% higher in 2021 and 2022), but with some soil parameters varied from one year to the next. In 2021, lower plant density (p ​&lt; ​0.05) was recorded under CA, highlighting the need to improve the efficiency of no-till sowing methods. Intermediate consumption was not significant between the treatments for both years. Non-significant difference in yields was recorded under the three treatments in both years, but while both CA systems remained stable, CT dropped by 10% in 2022 with some differences for yield components with a larger number of grains per column and higher mass of grains under CAS. Gross value added under CA was 12.7% less than CT in 2021, it surpassed CT by 43% in 2022. Agronomic and economic performances were still unstable at this early stage of implementation with wide variability across the two cropping seasons emphasizing that with this soil type, CA induced a significant increase in soil health but did not yet lead to significant increase in productivity or economic outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911925000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil fertility depletion is a major challenge for annual rainfed cropping systems in the northwestern region of Cambodia which has recently undergone rapid agrarian changes. On-farm impacts of conventional tillage and Conservation Agriculture-based practices (CT and CA respectively) of maize cultivation on soil health along with agronomic and economic performances were compared. The experiment was set up in 2020 comparing CT and CA with one cover crop (CAS) and CA with a mix of three cover crops (CAM). Soil health was assessed at the end of the cropping cycle using Biofunctool®. Agronomic performances including cover crops and a cash crop (maize) along with intermediate consumption were recorded in 2021 and 2022. Selected components of soil health, agronomic and economic performances were used for multi-criteria analysis. On this Mollisols, SHI was positively impacted under CA (15% and 6% higher in 2021 and 2022), but with some soil parameters varied from one year to the next. In 2021, lower plant density (p ​< ​0.05) was recorded under CA, highlighting the need to improve the efficiency of no-till sowing methods. Intermediate consumption was not significant between the treatments for both years. Non-significant difference in yields was recorded under the three treatments in both years, but while both CA systems remained stable, CT dropped by 10% in 2022 with some differences for yield components with a larger number of grains per column and higher mass of grains under CAS. Gross value added under CA was 12.7% less than CT in 2021, it surpassed CT by 43% in 2022. Agronomic and economic performances were still unstable at this early stage of implementation with wide variability across the two cropping seasons emphasizing that with this soil type, CA induced a significant increase in soil health but did not yet lead to significant increase in productivity or economic outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the performance of biobased, recovered nitrogen fertilizers in European cropping systems using modelling Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia How has scientific literature addressed crop planning at farm level: A bibliometric-qualitative review Spatiotemporal variation of crop diversification across Eastern Indo Gangetic plains of South Asia Perennial rice – An alternative to the ‘one-sow, one-harvest’ rice production: Benefits, challenges, and future prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1