Dispelling myths: Reviewing the evidence on zoning reforms in Auckland

IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Land Use Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107498
Stuart Donovan , Matthew Maltman
{"title":"Dispelling myths: Reviewing the evidence on zoning reforms in Auckland","authors":"Stuart Donovan ,&nbsp;Matthew Maltman","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2016, the city of Auckland adopted zoning reforms that enabled more housing on approximately three-quarters of its urban land. Three subsequent studies have found that these reforms increased housing supply and reduced rents. Two economists have, however, criticised these studies on blogs and social media, describing their findings as a “myth”. Despite their informal nature, these critiques have been cited in formal planning and policy processes. Here, we review these critiques and find them to have little to no merit. Specifically, the critiques misunderstand the papers’ methods and rely on inappropriate analyses. In our view, there is remarkably robust evidence that zoning reforms increased housing supply and reduced rents in Auckland.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 107498"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016, the city of Auckland adopted zoning reforms that enabled more housing on approximately three-quarters of its urban land. Three subsequent studies have found that these reforms increased housing supply and reduced rents. Two economists have, however, criticised these studies on blogs and social media, describing their findings as a “myth”. Despite their informal nature, these critiques have been cited in formal planning and policy processes. Here, we review these critiques and find them to have little to no merit. Specifically, the critiques misunderstand the papers’ methods and rely on inappropriate analyses. In our view, there is remarkably robust evidence that zoning reforms increased housing supply and reduced rents in Auckland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除神话:回顾奥克兰分区改革的证据
2016年,奥克兰市通过了分区改革,在大约四分之三的城市土地上建造了更多的住房。随后的三项研究发现,这些改革增加了住房供应,降低了租金。然而,两位经济学家在博客和社交媒体上批评了这些研究,称他们的发现是“神话”。尽管这些批评是非正式的,但已在正式的规划和政策过程中被引用。在这里,我们回顾了这些批评,发现它们几乎没有任何价值。具体来说,这些批评误解了论文的方法,并依赖于不适当的分析。在我们看来,有非常有力的证据表明,分区改革增加了奥克兰的住房供应,降低了租金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
期刊最新文献
Land cover change dynamics: Leveraging time series geospatial data for informed restoration in Tanzania Modern approaches to building interpretable models of the property market using machine learning on the base of mass cadastral valuation Computational intelligence based land-use allocation approaches for mixed use areas Reforming land valuation and taxation in Ukraine: A path towards greater sustainability, fairness, and transparency Diverse interplay of grey and green space in distinct Asian arid and semi-arid cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1