Jan J.M. Cuppen , Dick A.W. Janssen , Huub F.J. Savelkoul
{"title":"Mitigating recurrent Urinary tract infections using neutrophil activation by a low frequency electromagnetic field exposure: A hypothesis","authors":"Jan J.M. Cuppen , Dick A.W. Janssen , Huub F.J. Savelkoul","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2025.111578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper hypothesises that activating neutrophils using a low-frequency electromagnetic field (LF-EMF) micro-stimulus could reduce immune delays. In recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) that would mean less symptoms and less need for antibiotics.</div><div>Uropathogenic <em>Escherichia coli</em> (UPEC) induces a temporary immune delay, allowing it to multiply to high bacterial load before the immune system responds. UPEC then also establishes an intracellular niche that protects a population of replicating bacteria from arriving phagocytes. A low-cost, low-burden treatment with a subtle electromagnetic stimulus has recently been shown to activate neutrophils <em>in vivo</em> in humans. The same stimulus has been shown in animal and in vitro experiments to immediately increase immune function, reduce mortality and tissue damage and increase vitality with an easy treatment of 30 min per day. We hypothesize that the selected Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field (LF-EMF) treatment will accelerate neutrophil activation and recruitment to the bladder, reducing immune delay. When used early in a UTI episode it can speed up the immune response, can therefore reduce both the maximum ‘size’ of the infection and of the immune response, and thereby reduce disease-symptoms and tissue-damage. By reducing the need for antibiotics, it can also help to mitigate the increase of antibiotic resistance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 111578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987725000179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper hypothesises that activating neutrophils using a low-frequency electromagnetic field (LF-EMF) micro-stimulus could reduce immune delays. In recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) that would mean less symptoms and less need for antibiotics.
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) induces a temporary immune delay, allowing it to multiply to high bacterial load before the immune system responds. UPEC then also establishes an intracellular niche that protects a population of replicating bacteria from arriving phagocytes. A low-cost, low-burden treatment with a subtle electromagnetic stimulus has recently been shown to activate neutrophils in vivo in humans. The same stimulus has been shown in animal and in vitro experiments to immediately increase immune function, reduce mortality and tissue damage and increase vitality with an easy treatment of 30 min per day. We hypothesize that the selected Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field (LF-EMF) treatment will accelerate neutrophil activation and recruitment to the bladder, reducing immune delay. When used early in a UTI episode it can speed up the immune response, can therefore reduce both the maximum ‘size’ of the infection and of the immune response, and thereby reduce disease-symptoms and tissue-damage. By reducing the need for antibiotics, it can also help to mitigate the increase of antibiotic resistance.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.