From developmentalism to developmentality: How development constructs its geographies of control and contempt

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1111/cag.70002
Arslan Waheed
{"title":"From developmentalism to developmentality: How development constructs its geographies of control and contempt","authors":"Arslan Waheed","doi":"10.1111/cag.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Development is not a set of performative actions. Rather, it is produced and reproduced over the years as a discourse (in the Foucauldian sense) that operates through a variety of categories of knowledge. In this way, development is a set of socio-political and economic beliefs—an undeniable truth—that is exported to Pakistan through international institutions and technocrats. This paper attempts to understand the dissemination of development in Pakistan by focusing on the constructivist tendencies of development that employ various discursive strategies and language techniques to naturalize the socio-economic and political hierarchies both socially and spatially. Taking the planning and development of Islamabad—a model urban settlement and a crown jewel of development in the country's history—as the case study, this research finds that various labels, linguistics contrasts, othering, and socio-economic hierarchies were constructed and employed to construct the socio-materiality of development as a natural order of things. This developmentality (drawing on Foucault's governmentality) is found in more than 150 planning and policy-related documents from 1957 to 2018, showing the patronization and reproduction of power hierarchies, inequalities, exclusion, discrimination, and control</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":47619,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cag.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Development is not a set of performative actions. Rather, it is produced and reproduced over the years as a discourse (in the Foucauldian sense) that operates through a variety of categories of knowledge. In this way, development is a set of socio-political and economic beliefs—an undeniable truth—that is exported to Pakistan through international institutions and technocrats. This paper attempts to understand the dissemination of development in Pakistan by focusing on the constructivist tendencies of development that employ various discursive strategies and language techniques to naturalize the socio-economic and political hierarchies both socially and spatially. Taking the planning and development of Islamabad—a model urban settlement and a crown jewel of development in the country's history—as the case study, this research finds that various labels, linguistics contrasts, othering, and socio-economic hierarchies were constructed and employed to construct the socio-materiality of development as a natural order of things. This developmentality (drawing on Foucault's governmentality) is found in more than 150 planning and policy-related documents from 1957 to 2018, showing the patronization and reproduction of power hierarchies, inequalities, exclusion, discrimination, and control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从发展主义到发展主义:发展如何建构其控制与蔑视的地理
开发并不是一系列的行为。相反,它是多年来作为一种话语(在福柯的意义上)产生和复制的,这种话语通过各种各样的知识类别运作。在这种情况下,发展是一套社会政治和经济信念——一个不可否认的事实——通过国际机构和技术官僚输出到巴基斯坦。本文试图通过关注发展的建构主义倾向来理解巴基斯坦发展的传播,这种倾向采用各种话语策略和语言技巧来自然化社会和空间上的社会经济和政治等级。本研究以伊斯兰堡的规划和发展为例,发现各种标签、语言学对比、其他和社会经济等级被构建和使用,以构建发展的社会物质性作为事物的自然秩序。从1957年到2018年,在150多份与规划和政策相关的文件中发现了这种发展(借鉴了福柯的治理理论),显示了权力等级、不平等、排斥、歧视和控制的庇护和再生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
Understanding the human dimensions of wildfire risk at a community level in British Columbia, Canada Issue Information / Dans ce numéro The Agricultural Heritage System framework for collaborative environmental governance: A case for the Bay of Fundy's dykelands and foreshore marshes Higher education institutions and Sustainable Development Goals: Examining the perceptions of U15 Canada officials Geographic disparities in access to primary and rheumatology care: Potential versus realized access
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1