A pilot trial exploring the use of music in the emergency department and its association with delirium and other clinical outcomes

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Australasia Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.70004
Danielle Ní Chróinín MB BCh BAO, BMedSc MD (research), Sandra Wang MBBS, Guruprasad Nagaraj MBBS, Shiquan Ren BSc, MSc, PhD, Paul M Middleton RGN MBBS DipIMCRCS (Ed) MMed(Clin Epi), MD(Imp Lond), Alison Short BMus (Music Therapy), MA (Music Therapy), PhD
{"title":"A pilot trial exploring the use of music in the emergency department and its association with delirium and other clinical outcomes","authors":"Danielle Ní Chróinín MB BCh BAO, BMedSc MD (research),&nbsp;Sandra Wang MBBS,&nbsp;Guruprasad Nagaraj MBBS,&nbsp;Shiquan Ren BSc, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Paul M Middleton RGN MBBS DipIMCRCS (Ed) MMed(Clin Epi), MD(Imp Lond),&nbsp;Alison Short BMus (Music Therapy), MA (Music Therapy), PhD","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess potential feasibility of a targeted music intervention trial in older ED patients and association with clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective pragmatic trial of adults aged ≥65 years in the ED, with prevalent delirium or increased risk of incident delirium, receiving either 2-h music intervention via headphones or usual care. The primary outcomes were (i) feasibility as assessed by actual use of the intervention (target 70% of offered patients) and (ii) incident delirium in delirium-free patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 211 initially screened patients, 44 were included. The initially planned randomised controlled trial proved difficult due to poor intervention adherence, resulting in a move to patient self-selection to routine care or 2-h music intervention. There were 19 control (13 prevalent delirium) and 25 intervention participants (20 prevalent delirium); 2-h target intervention duration was achieved in 17/25 (68%) patients (8/25 achieving &lt;2 h). Among those without prevalent delirium, incident delirium occurred in 1/6 of control and 4/5 of intervention (<i>P</i> = 0.08). There were no between-group differences in terms of improved or resolved delirium, pain scores or agitation/sedation scores (all <i>P</i> &gt; 0.1).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Self-selected use of a targeted music intervention was feasible in a cohort of older ED patients. While we were likely underpowered to detect associations between intervention and outcome, collection of selected outcome measures proved feasible; these may be helpful in larger scale studies. Exploration of barriers and facilitators to use, as well as preferred delivery methods, are likely to be helpful in wider investigations of music therapy in this high-risk cohort.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess potential feasibility of a targeted music intervention trial in older ED patients and association with clinical outcomes.

Methods

Prospective pragmatic trial of adults aged ≥65 years in the ED, with prevalent delirium or increased risk of incident delirium, receiving either 2-h music intervention via headphones or usual care. The primary outcomes were (i) feasibility as assessed by actual use of the intervention (target 70% of offered patients) and (ii) incident delirium in delirium-free patients.

Results

Among 211 initially screened patients, 44 were included. The initially planned randomised controlled trial proved difficult due to poor intervention adherence, resulting in a move to patient self-selection to routine care or 2-h music intervention. There were 19 control (13 prevalent delirium) and 25 intervention participants (20 prevalent delirium); 2-h target intervention duration was achieved in 17/25 (68%) patients (8/25 achieving <2 h). Among those without prevalent delirium, incident delirium occurred in 1/6 of control and 4/5 of intervention (P = 0.08). There were no between-group differences in terms of improved or resolved delirium, pain scores or agitation/sedation scores (all P > 0.1).

Conclusions

Self-selected use of a targeted music intervention was feasible in a cohort of older ED patients. While we were likely underpowered to detect associations between intervention and outcome, collection of selected outcome measures proved feasible; these may be helpful in larger scale studies. Exploration of barriers and facilitators to use, as well as preferred delivery methods, are likely to be helpful in wider investigations of music therapy in this high-risk cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项探索在急诊科使用音乐及其与谵妄和其他临床结果的关系的试点试验
目的探讨针对性音乐干预老年ED患者的可行性及其与临床预后的关系。方法前瞻性实用试验对象为年龄≥65岁、谵妄多发或谵妄发生率增高的ED患者,接受耳机2小时音乐干预或常规护理。主要结果是(i)通过实际使用干预评估的可行性(目标70%提供的患者)和(ii)无谵妄患者发生谵妄。结果211例初筛患者中,44例纳入。由于干预依从性差,最初计划的随机对照试验证明困难,导致患者自行选择常规护理或2小时音乐干预。对照组19例(13例谵妄),干预组25例(20例谵妄);17/25(68%)患者达到2小时目标干预时间(8/25达到2小时)。在无普遍谵妄的患者中,对照组发生谵妄的比例为1/6,干预组为4/5 (P = 0.08)。在改善或缓解谵妄、疼痛评分或躁动/镇静评分方面,组间无差异(均P >; 0.1)。结论:在老年ED患者队列中,自我选择有针对性的音乐干预是可行的。虽然我们可能没有足够的能力来检测干预和结果之间的联系,但收集选定的结果测量被证明是可行的;这些可能有助于更大规模的研究。探索障碍和促进剂的使用,以及首选的传递方法,可能有助于在这一高危人群中进行更广泛的音乐治疗研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Emergency Physicians as Inpatient Specialists: Evolving Models of Trauma Care Coordinating Expertise: Defining the Role of the Modern Trauma Specialist The Future of Trauma Care in Aotearoa New Zealand: Towards a Collaborative Model Optimal Care for the Polytrauma Patient: The Importance of Surgical Leadership Response to ‘The Sedation Gap Conundrum: Where's the Awareness?’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1