The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the patient's baseline clinical status

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70137
Marco Franceschini, Angelo Boffa, Alessandro Di Martino, Elettra Pignotti, Luca Andriolo, Stefano Zaffagnini, Giuseppe Filardo
{"title":"The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the patient's baseline clinical status","authors":"Marco Franceschini,&nbsp;Angelo Boffa,&nbsp;Alessandro Di Martino,&nbsp;Elettra Pignotti,&nbsp;Luca Andriolo,&nbsp;Stefano Zaffagnini,&nbsp;Giuseppe Filardo","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To quantify the influence of baseline values of a specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculation in a homogeneous series of knee osteoarthritis patients treated with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A data set of 312 patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with intra-articular PRP injections was used. Patients were evaluated through the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score at 6 months after treatment. According to the baseline IKDC score, the study population was stratified into eight clusters in the first phase (&lt;20, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79 and ≥80) and in three macro clusters in the second phase (&lt;40, 40–69 and ≥70). MCID for the IKDC score was calculated through an anchor-based method in both phases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The MCID calculation was performed for the eight clusters according to the baseline IKDC values, obtaining values from 16.2 to −3.1. Afterwards, further MCID calculation was performed after unifying patients in three major clusters based on the similarity of the previously obtained MCID values. Ninety-six patients reported a baseline IKDC score &lt;40, 173 patients between 40 and 70, and 43 patients ≥70. MCID values for the three macro clusters were: 14.6 for patients with baseline IKDC score &lt;40, 7.2 for patients with values between 40 and 69, while patients with values ≥70 reported an MCID value of −2.8.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrated that the baseline patient clinical status influences the improvement needed to be perceived as clinically relevant. Patients with a worse baseline clinical status presented higher MCID levels, while MCID lost significance in patients with high baseline clinical values. These findings warrant applying general thresholds to a patients' cohort, showing the remarkable impact of the baseline clinical status. Patient stratification ensures a proper quantification of MCID values and the identification of patients benefiting from the studied treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level 4.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70137","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To quantify the influence of baseline values of a specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculation in a homogeneous series of knee osteoarthritis patients treated with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections.

Methods

A data set of 312 patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with intra-articular PRP injections was used. Patients were evaluated through the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score at 6 months after treatment. According to the baseline IKDC score, the study population was stratified into eight clusters in the first phase (<20, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79 and ≥80) and in three macro clusters in the second phase (<40, 40–69 and ≥70). MCID for the IKDC score was calculated through an anchor-based method in both phases.

Results

The MCID calculation was performed for the eight clusters according to the baseline IKDC values, obtaining values from 16.2 to −3.1. Afterwards, further MCID calculation was performed after unifying patients in three major clusters based on the similarity of the previously obtained MCID values. Ninety-six patients reported a baseline IKDC score <40, 173 patients between 40 and 70, and 43 patients ≥70. MCID values for the three macro clusters were: 14.6 for patients with baseline IKDC score <40, 7.2 for patients with values between 40 and 69, while patients with values ≥70 reported an MCID value of −2.8.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the baseline patient clinical status influences the improvement needed to be perceived as clinically relevant. Patients with a worse baseline clinical status presented higher MCID levels, while MCID lost significance in patients with high baseline clinical values. These findings warrant applying general thresholds to a patients' cohort, showing the remarkable impact of the baseline clinical status. Patient stratification ensures a proper quantification of MCID values and the identification of patients benefiting from the studied treatment.

Level of Evidence

Level 4.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据患者的基线临床状态,最小临床重要差异变化很大
目的:量化一种特定患者报告结果测量(PROM)的基线值对均质系列膝关节骨关节炎患者接受富血小板血浆(PRP)注射治疗的最小临床重要差异(MCID)计算的影响。方法对312例膝关节骨性关节炎患者进行关节内PRP注射治疗。在治疗后6个月,通过国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分对患者进行评估。根据基线IKDC评分,研究人群在第一阶段分为8个集群(<;20、20 - 29、30-39、40 - 49、50-59、60-69、70 - 79和≥80),在第二阶段分为3个宏观集群(<;40、40 - 69和≥70)。在两个阶段,通过基于锚点的方法计算IKDC评分的MCID。结果根据基线IKDC值对8个聚类进行MCID计算,取值范围为16.2 ~−3.1。然后,根据先前获得的MCID值的相似性,将患者统一为三个主要聚类,进一步进行MCID计算。96例患者报告基线IKDC评分为40分,173例患者在40 - 70分之间,43例患者≥70分。三个宏观聚类的MCID值为:基线IKDC评分为40的患者为14.6,值在40 - 69之间的患者为7.2,而值≥70的患者报告的MCID值为−2.8。结论:本研究表明,患者的基线临床状态会影响需要被视为临床相关的改善。基线临床状态较差的患者MCID水平较高,而基线临床值较高的患者MCID水平无统计学意义。这些发现证明将一般阈值应用于患者队列,显示基线临床状态的显着影响。患者分层确保适当量化MCID值,并确定从所研究的治疗中受益的患者。证据等级4级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implant selection and causes of aseptic failure in conversion from unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: A high-volume centre series. Knee kinesiography in 2026: Current and future applications for digital orthopaedics and personalised total knee arthroplasty: A narrative review. Difference in anterior tibial subluxation measured with the bone axis method predicts high-grade pivot shift in ACL-deficient knees: A multicenter cohort study. 3D geometric modelling and clinical validation of lower limb and preliminary 2-year post-operative clinical outcomes of neutral boundary alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Do we need rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty? Evidence, uncertainty and the need for focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1