Maximilian Fischer, Lars Nonnenmacher, Andreas Nitsch, Matthias R. Mühler, Andre Hofer, Georgi I. Wassilew
{"title":"Greater anterior pelvic tilt and lumbar mobility in females compared to males undergoing periacetabular osteotomy: A matched cohort study","authors":"Maximilian Fischer, Lars Nonnenmacher, Andreas Nitsch, Matthias R. Mühler, Andre Hofer, Georgi I. Wassilew","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The functional hip–spine interaction is increasingly noted in hip preservation by periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), while potentially affecting the impingement-free acetabular reorientation. However, the clinically relevant sex-related differences in lumbopelvic alignment have been poorly studied. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate a matched PAO patient cohort for sex-related differences in lumbopelvic alignment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 138 patients undergoing PAO between January 2024 and September 2024 at one high-volume centre, there were 68 data sets (34 male, 34 female) included. The data sets of this diagnostic cohort study were prospectively collected, and the patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio for sex, age and acetabular morphology (hip dysplasia, borderline hip dysplasia, acetabular retroversion). Lumbopelvic alignment was assessed with serial sagittal lumbopelvic radiographs in standing, relaxed-seated and deep-seated positions. Each radiograph was reviewed for pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis and sacral slope.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Females showed a significantly lower PT in standing (7.8 vs. 14.3°, <i>p</i> < 0.001), relaxed-seated (28.1 vs. 34.9°, <i>p</i> = 0.012) and deep-seated (3.7 vs. 11.0°, <i>p</i> = 0.013) positions. Furthermore, females had a significantly increased lumbar mobility (Δ relaxed-seated − deep-seated position − 35.4° vs. 27.0°, <i>p</i> = 0.003), while there was no sex-related difference in sacral mobility (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There are sex-related differences in functional lumbopelvic alignment across various positions of daily living in patients undergoing PAO. With a greater anterior PT, females are at risk of an anterior hip impingement. Thus, the intraoperative anterior and posterior wall reorientation by PAO should be adapted to the sex-related lumbopelvic alignment to ensure an impingement-free surgical outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV, case series.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The functional hip–spine interaction is increasingly noted in hip preservation by periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), while potentially affecting the impingement-free acetabular reorientation. However, the clinically relevant sex-related differences in lumbopelvic alignment have been poorly studied. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate a matched PAO patient cohort for sex-related differences in lumbopelvic alignment.
Methods
Out of 138 patients undergoing PAO between January 2024 and September 2024 at one high-volume centre, there were 68 data sets (34 male, 34 female) included. The data sets of this diagnostic cohort study were prospectively collected, and the patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio for sex, age and acetabular morphology (hip dysplasia, borderline hip dysplasia, acetabular retroversion). Lumbopelvic alignment was assessed with serial sagittal lumbopelvic radiographs in standing, relaxed-seated and deep-seated positions. Each radiograph was reviewed for pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis and sacral slope.
Results
Females showed a significantly lower PT in standing (7.8 vs. 14.3°, p < 0.001), relaxed-seated (28.1 vs. 34.9°, p = 0.012) and deep-seated (3.7 vs. 11.0°, p = 0.013) positions. Furthermore, females had a significantly increased lumbar mobility (Δ relaxed-seated − deep-seated position − 35.4° vs. 27.0°, p = 0.003), while there was no sex-related difference in sacral mobility (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
There are sex-related differences in functional lumbopelvic alignment across various positions of daily living in patients undergoing PAO. With a greater anterior PT, females are at risk of an anterior hip impingement. Thus, the intraoperative anterior and posterior wall reorientation by PAO should be adapted to the sex-related lumbopelvic alignment to ensure an impingement-free surgical outcome.