A Drone-Based Thermophysical Investigation of Barringer Meteorite Crater Ejecta

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Earth and Space Science Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1029/2024EA003984
Cole A. Nypaver, Bradley J. Thomson, Jeffrey E. Moersch, David A. Kring
{"title":"A Drone-Based Thermophysical Investigation of Barringer Meteorite Crater Ejecta","authors":"Cole A. Nypaver,&nbsp;Bradley J. Thomson,&nbsp;Jeffrey E. Moersch,&nbsp;David A. Kring","doi":"10.1029/2024EA003984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Impact cratering processes are ubiquitous throughout our solar system, and the distribution and modification of impact ejecta are sensitive to variable environmental and geologic surface conditions. Here we examine the scale dependency of orbital versus field-based remote sensing data sets of a terrestrial impact structure by comparing low-resolution (90 m/pixel) orbital with high-resolution (23 cm/pixel) drone-based thermophysical data to measure ejecta distribution patterns of Meteor Crater in northeast Arizona, USA. Our results indicate that the thermophysical properties of the Meteor Crater ejecta blanket are well constrained at the scale of orbital data resolution. However, when high-resolution, drone-based data are binned using previously mapped unit boundaries, no clear correlations between thermophysical properties and surface composition are observed. A trend of increasing apparent thermal inertia with surface rock population is observed. These results indicate that significant ejecta distribution variability can exist below the resolution of orbital thermophysical remote sensing data. In addition to providing insights into how remote sensing data can improve field-based geologic mapping campaigns and impact crater analyses, our results place constraints on how the accuracy of geologic maps may be affected by surface erosion.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA003984","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA003984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impact cratering processes are ubiquitous throughout our solar system, and the distribution and modification of impact ejecta are sensitive to variable environmental and geologic surface conditions. Here we examine the scale dependency of orbital versus field-based remote sensing data sets of a terrestrial impact structure by comparing low-resolution (90 m/pixel) orbital with high-resolution (23 cm/pixel) drone-based thermophysical data to measure ejecta distribution patterns of Meteor Crater in northeast Arizona, USA. Our results indicate that the thermophysical properties of the Meteor Crater ejecta blanket are well constrained at the scale of orbital data resolution. However, when high-resolution, drone-based data are binned using previously mapped unit boundaries, no clear correlations between thermophysical properties and surface composition are observed. A trend of increasing apparent thermal inertia with surface rock population is observed. These results indicate that significant ejecta distribution variability can exist below the resolution of orbital thermophysical remote sensing data. In addition to providing insights into how remote sensing data can improve field-based geologic mapping campaigns and impact crater analyses, our results place constraints on how the accuracy of geologic maps may be affected by surface erosion.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Local Time Variations of Quiet Time Meridional Winds During Solar Minimum Solstices Based on ICON Observations and Numerical Simulations Spatio-Seasonal Risk Assessment of Upward Lightning at Tall Objects Using Meteorological Reanalysis Data Wind Profile Characteristics That Warn of Summertime Flash Heavy Rain Events Over the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Basin Exploring Machine Learning's Potential for Estimating High Resolution Daily Snow Depth in Western Himalaya Using Passive Microwave Remote Sensing Data Sets Characteristics of Regional Hourly Extreme Precipitation With Different Durations Over the Northeast Plain, China During Summer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1