A New Empirical Model of the Determinants of Sickness and the Choice Between Presenteeism and Absence

IF 0.5 Q4 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Labour-England Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1111/labr.12286
Théo Denis, Joseph Lanfranchi
{"title":"A New Empirical Model of the Determinants of Sickness and the Choice Between Presenteeism and Absence","authors":"Théo Denis,&nbsp;Joseph Lanfranchi","doi":"10.1111/labr.12286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article revisits the association between employment characteristics, working conditions, and the annual duration of sickness presenteeism or absence using a French representative survey. Our novel estimation method controls for endogenous participation, as working conditions can affect employees' likelihood of illness separately from the decision to stay at home or work ill. We use a copula approach to model the link between illness and the duration of presenteeism and absence. Without correcting for endogenous participation, our estimates would be biased, and the determinants of sickness absence or presenteeism incorrectly identified. This work helps to highlight firm policy instruments that protect health and affect the choice between sickness presenteeism and absence.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45843,"journal":{"name":"Labour-England","volume":"39 1","pages":"61-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/labr.12286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article revisits the association between employment characteristics, working conditions, and the annual duration of sickness presenteeism or absence using a French representative survey. Our novel estimation method controls for endogenous participation, as working conditions can affect employees' likelihood of illness separately from the decision to stay at home or work ill. We use a copula approach to model the link between illness and the duration of presenteeism and absence. Without correcting for endogenous participation, our estimates would be biased, and the determinants of sickness absence or presenteeism incorrectly identified. This work helps to highlight firm policy instruments that protect health and affect the choice between sickness presenteeism and absence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疾病决定因素的新实证模型及出勤与缺席的选择
本文利用法国代表性调查,重新审视了就业特征、工作条件和每年患病出勤或缺勤时间之间的关系。我们的新估计方法控制了内生参与,因为工作条件会影响员工生病的可能性,而不是决定留在家里或带病工作。我们使用一种联结方法来模拟疾病与出勤和缺勤时间之间的联系。如果不校正内源性参与,我们的估计就会有偏差,并且错误地确定了疾病缺勤或出勤的决定因素。这项工作有助于突出保护健康和影响在病假出勤和缺勤之间作出选择的坚定政策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labour-England
Labour-England INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: LABOUR provides a forum for analysis and debate on issues concerning labour economics and industrial relations. The Journal publishes high quality contributions which combine economic theory and statistical methodology in order to analyse behaviour, institutions and policies relevant to the labour market.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Researchers of a Feather Flock Together: Endogamy Recruitment Tracks for Industrial Researchers Issue Information Endogenous Female Labour Force Participation and Their Attachment to the Labour Market The Moderating Effect of Firm-Specificity on the Impact of Unemployment on the Demand for Apprentices: Evidence From Switzerland During COVID19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1