Re-evaluating vertebral height restoration assessment in osteoporotic compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-08707-1
Victoria Marino, Nirav Mungalpara, Farid Amirouche
{"title":"Re-evaluating vertebral height restoration assessment in osteoporotic compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Victoria Marino, Nirav Mungalpara, Farid Amirouche","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08707-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common among the elderly, causing significant morbidity, pain, and disability. This study quantitatively analyzes the vertebral height restoration via Kyphoplasty (KP) and Vertebroplasty (VP), along with the cement volume used and leakage percentage. Our meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compares these objective outcomes, considering cement volume and leakage in both procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases searched included Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science using MeSH keywords: 'Kyphoplasty,' 'Vertebroplasty,' 'Vertebral height restoration,' 'Bone cement volume,' and 'Vertebral compression fractures.' Fourteen RCTs were selected, focusing on outcomes such as anterior and central vertebral body height, kyphotic angle, cement volume, and leakage. Data analysis included mean values, standard deviations, ranges, Cohen's d-effect sizes, and standard errors, summarized in a forest plotQuery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 1456 patients (mean age 71.11 years). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 48 months (mean 15 months). KP showed a greater effect size in restoring anterior and central vertebral body height and kyphotic angle. Combined data from KP and VP showed increases of 3.48 mm (19.14%) in anterior vertebral heights, 4.38 mm in central vertebral heights, and a 2.85-degree correction in kyphotic angle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both KP and VP effectively restore vertebral height in VCF patients. KP is superior in restoring anterior and central vertebral body height and correcting kyphotic angle. VP, particularly unilateral, shows higher central vertebral height restoration but higher cement leakage. Standardized reporting and patient-specific volumetric assessments are crucial for optimizing vertebral augmentation procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1641-1662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08707-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common among the elderly, causing significant morbidity, pain, and disability. This study quantitatively analyzes the vertebral height restoration via Kyphoplasty (KP) and Vertebroplasty (VP), along with the cement volume used and leakage percentage. Our meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compares these objective outcomes, considering cement volume and leakage in both procedures.

Methods: Databases searched included Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science using MeSH keywords: 'Kyphoplasty,' 'Vertebroplasty,' 'Vertebral height restoration,' 'Bone cement volume,' and 'Vertebral compression fractures.' Fourteen RCTs were selected, focusing on outcomes such as anterior and central vertebral body height, kyphotic angle, cement volume, and leakage. Data analysis included mean values, standard deviations, ranges, Cohen's d-effect sizes, and standard errors, summarized in a forest plotQuery.

Results: The review included 1456 patients (mean age 71.11 years). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 48 months (mean 15 months). KP showed a greater effect size in restoring anterior and central vertebral body height and kyphotic angle. Combined data from KP and VP showed increases of 3.48 mm (19.14%) in anterior vertebral heights, 4.38 mm in central vertebral heights, and a 2.85-degree correction in kyphotic angle.

Conclusions: Both KP and VP effectively restore vertebral height in VCF patients. KP is superior in restoring anterior and central vertebral body height and correcting kyphotic angle. VP, particularly unilateral, shows higher central vertebral height restoration but higher cement leakage. Standardized reporting and patient-specific volumetric assessments are crucial for optimizing vertebral augmentation procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新评估骨质疏松性压缩性骨折椎体高度恢复评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:椎体压缩性骨折(VCFs)在老年人中很常见,引起显著的发病率、疼痛和残疾。本研究定量分析了通过后凸成形术(KP)和椎体成形术(VP)修复椎体高度,以及使用的水泥体积和渗漏百分比。我们对14项随机对照试验(rct)进行了荟萃分析,比较了两种手术中水泥体积和渗漏的客观结果。方法:检索数据库包括Medline、PubMed和Web of Science,使用MeSH关键词:“后凸成形术”、“椎体成形术”、“椎体高度恢复”、“骨水泥体积”和“椎体压缩性骨折”。选择了14项随机对照试验,重点关注前椎体和中央椎体高度、后凸角、水泥体积和渗漏等结果。数据分析包括平均值、标准差、范围、科恩d效应大小和标准误差,汇总在森林图中。结果:纳入1456例患者,平均年龄71.11岁。随访1 ~ 48个月,平均15个月。KP在恢复椎体前部和中央高度和后凸角方面显示出更大的效应大小。KP和VP的综合数据显示,椎体前部高度增加3.48 mm(19.14%),椎体中央高度增加4.38 mm,后凸角矫正2.85度。结论:KP和VP均能有效恢复VCF患者的椎体高度。KP在恢复椎体前部和中央高度和矫正后凸角度方面具有优势。VP,尤其是单侧VP,显示较高的椎体中央高度恢复,但较高的水泥渗漏。标准化报告和患者特异性体积评估对于优化椎体增强手术至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Minimally invasive paramedian transmuscular approach for intracanal tumors: case series, microsurgical technique and outcomes. 12th rib length and L4 branch morphology predict cranio-caudal symptom discrepancies in lumbar disorders: clinical and cadaveric study. Impact of coccydynia on quality of life, function, and neuromuscular control in women with third trimester pelvic girdle pain: a cross-sectional study. Impact of vertebrae shape variation on lumbar spine loading: an image-based computational modeling study. Central sensitization as a predictor of short-term postoperative outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1