Stakeholder Perspectives on Community Participation and Ownership in Community Mental Health Policy and Services: Mixed Methods Study in Ghana.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251318593
Peter Badimak Yaro, Philip Teg-NefaahTabong, Emmanual Asampong
{"title":"Stakeholder Perspectives on Community Participation and Ownership in Community Mental Health Policy and Services: Mixed Methods Study in Ghana.","authors":"Peter Badimak Yaro, Philip Teg-NefaahTabong, Emmanual Asampong","doi":"10.1177/11786329251318593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Addressing the mental healthcare needs of the population at the Primary Health Care (PHC) level has gained global consensus as a key strategy to realising the mental health targets of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDG3. This research explored the question 'What is the nature and level of community participation and ownership in the development and integration of mental healthcare service provision at the PHC, especially at Community Health Planning and Services Centre (CHPS) level(s) in Ghana?'. A cross-sectional study that adopted concurrent mixed quantitative and qualitative research methods was undertaken to explore and answer the question. The quantitative data of the study was collected through a survey questionnaire. Key informant interviews and focus group discussions were used to collect the qualitative data. Thematic analysis with the use of NVivo 12 was applied for the qualitative field data and Stata SE16 used for quantitative data. Data triangulation strategy was used to report both the qualitative and quantitative data sets. The study findings show that community participation and ownership was low, requiring more concerted efforts to engender that into mental health care policy and services development and implementation to realise the seamless integration of mental healthcare into general healthcare at the PHC level. Community participation and ownership will substantially enhance the (re-)organisation and resourcing of mental health services in Ghana to make them more responsive and inclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251318593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251318593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Addressing the mental healthcare needs of the population at the Primary Health Care (PHC) level has gained global consensus as a key strategy to realising the mental health targets of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDG3. This research explored the question 'What is the nature and level of community participation and ownership in the development and integration of mental healthcare service provision at the PHC, especially at Community Health Planning and Services Centre (CHPS) level(s) in Ghana?'. A cross-sectional study that adopted concurrent mixed quantitative and qualitative research methods was undertaken to explore and answer the question. The quantitative data of the study was collected through a survey questionnaire. Key informant interviews and focus group discussions were used to collect the qualitative data. Thematic analysis with the use of NVivo 12 was applied for the qualitative field data and Stata SE16 used for quantitative data. Data triangulation strategy was used to report both the qualitative and quantitative data sets. The study findings show that community participation and ownership was low, requiring more concerted efforts to engender that into mental health care policy and services development and implementation to realise the seamless integration of mental healthcare into general healthcare at the PHC level. Community participation and ownership will substantially enhance the (re-)organisation and resourcing of mental health services in Ghana to make them more responsive and inclusive.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者对社区参与和社区精神卫生政策和服务所有权的看法:加纳混合方法研究。
在初级卫生保健(PHC)层面满足人口的精神卫生保健需求,作为实现联合国可持续发展目标(sdg),特别是SDG3的精神卫生具体目标的一项关键战略,已获得全球共识。这项研究探讨了这样一个问题:“在初级保健中心,特别是在加纳社区卫生规划和服务中心(CHPS)层面,社区参与和所有权的性质和水平是什么?”采用同时混合定量和定性研究方法的横断面研究进行了探索和回答这个问题。本研究的定量数据是通过问卷调查收集的。主要信息提供者访谈和焦点小组讨论用于收集定性数据。定性现场数据采用NVivo 12进行专题分析,定量数据采用Stata SE16。数据三角化策略用于报告定性和定量数据集。研究结果显示,社区参与和拥有度较低,需要更协调一致的努力,将其纳入精神卫生保健政策和服务的制定和实施,以实现精神卫生保健与初级保健一级的普通保健无缝结合。社区参与和所有权将大大加强加纳精神卫生服务的(重新)组织和资源配置,使其更具响应性和包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Women's Satisfaction with Midwifery-Led Continuity of Care: Insights from Antenatal, Intrapartum, and Postnatal Experiences in the Sidama Region, Ethiopia. A Non-Randomized Control Trial. The Financial and Workforce Impact of Medication Errors in the Finnish Public Healthcare System: A Pilot Study. Bridging Strategy and Local Reality: First-Line Managers' Experiences in Leading Large-Scale Implementation. From Vulnerability to Resilience: Community-Based Insights on Adolescent and Youth Depression in Underserved Communities in Mexico. The Association of Palliative Care Decision on Secondary Health Care Utilization and Cancer Treatment at the End of Life Among Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1