Effectiveness and safety of apixaban and warfarin in patients with new- onset atrial fibrillation after advanced chronic kidney disease or end-stage kidney disease

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.01.045
Ming-Ju Wu MD, PhD , Hsin-Hua Chen MD, PhD , Cheng-Hsu Chen MD, PhD , Shang-Feng Tsai MD, PhD
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of apixaban and warfarin in patients with new- onset atrial fibrillation after advanced chronic kidney disease or end-stage kidney disease","authors":"Ming-Ju Wu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hsin-Hua Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Cheng-Hsu Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shang-Feng Tsai MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.01.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited evidence supports the use of apixaban for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) when warfarin is often contraindicated.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Through an extensive cohort study, we attempted to compare the outcomes of apixaban and warfarin in patients within this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using TriNetX data (2017–2023), we compared apixaban and warfarin in patients with chronic AF after stage 5 CKD or ESKD. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox multivariate analysis were applied to reduce bias. Only exclusive users were included to prevent switching influence. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes (cerebrovascular events, bleeding, and mortality) were adjusted for competing risks. Subgroup analyses considered sex, age, and dialysis status. We also compared apixaban doses to evaluate dose-related effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After 1:1 PSM, our analysis included 1364 cases per group. The apixaban group showed significant advantages over the warfarin group in effectiveness (cerebral infarction: SHR 0.72; 95% CI 0.60–0.85; hemorrhagic stroke: SHR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28–0.63; cerebrovascular events: SHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59–0.81), bleeding safety (gastrointestinal bleeding: SHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61–0.97; blood transfusion: SHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61–0.87; bleeding-related outcomes: SHR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64–0.87), and all composite outcomes (SHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61–0.78). Subgroup analyses showed consistent improvements across gender, age, and dialysis status. Warfarin's time in therapeutic range was 44.4%. Sensitivity analysis still lacks sufficient evidence to determine whether the 5-mg or 2.5-mg dose of apixaban is superior.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This large cohort study highlights the lower risks of cerebrovascular events and bleeding associated with apixaban in patients with stage 5 CKD or those undergoing hemodialysis. However, the optimal dosage of apixaban requires further investigation in future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 5","pages":"Pages 1197-1209"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527125001225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Limited evidence supports the use of apixaban for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) when warfarin is often contraindicated.

Objective

Through an extensive cohort study, we attempted to compare the outcomes of apixaban and warfarin in patients within this population.

Methods

Using TriNetX data (2017–2023), we compared apixaban and warfarin in patients with chronic AF after stage 5 CKD or ESKD. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox multivariate analysis were applied to reduce bias. Only exclusive users were included to prevent switching influence. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes (cerebrovascular events, bleeding, and mortality) were adjusted for competing risks. Subgroup analyses considered sex, age, and dialysis status. We also compared apixaban doses to evaluate dose-related effects.

Results

After 1:1 PSM, our analysis included 1364 cases per group. The apixaban group showed significant advantages over the warfarin group in effectiveness (cerebral infarction: SHR 0.72; 95% CI 0.60–0.85; hemorrhagic stroke: SHR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28–0.63; cerebrovascular events: SHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59–0.81), bleeding safety (gastrointestinal bleeding: SHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61–0.97; blood transfusion: SHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61–0.87; bleeding-related outcomes: SHR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64–0.87), and all composite outcomes (SHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61–0.78). Subgroup analyses showed consistent improvements across gender, age, and dialysis status. Warfarin's time in therapeutic range was 44.4%. Sensitivity analysis still lacks sufficient evidence to determine whether the 5-mg or 2.5-mg dose of apixaban is superior.

Conclusion

This large cohort study highlights the lower risks of cerebrovascular events and bleeding associated with apixaban in patients with stage 5 CKD or those undergoing hemodialysis. However, the optimal dosage of apixaban requires further investigation in future studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿哌沙班和华法林治疗晚期慢性肾病或终末期肾病后新发房颤的有效性和安全性
背景和目的:有限的证据支持阿哌沙班用于重度慢性肾病(CKD)或终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的房颤(Af),其中华法林通常是禁忌症。方法:使用TriNetX数据(2017-2023),我们比较了阿哌沙班和华法林在5期ckd或ESKD后慢性心房颤动患者中的作用。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和Cox多变量分析来减少偏倚。仅包含独占用户,以防止切换影响。对结果(脑血管事件、出血和死亡率)的亚分布风险比(SHRs)和95% CI进行了竞争风险调整。亚组分析考虑了性别、年龄和透析状态。我们还比较了阿哌沙班剂量来评估剂量相关效应。结果:1:1 PSM后,我们的分析包括每组1364例。阿哌沙班组在有效性上明显优于华法林组(脑梗死:SHR=0.72, 95% CI=0.60-0.85;出血性卒中:SHR=0.42, 95% CI=0.28-0.63;脑血管事件:SHR=0.69, 95% CI=0.59-0.81),出血安全性(胃肠道出血:SHR=0.77, 95% CI=0.61-0.97;输血:SHR=0.73, 95% CI=0.61 ~ 0.87;出血相关结局:SHR=0.75, 95% CI=0.64-0.87)和所有复合结局(SHR=0.69, 95% CI=0.61-0.78)。亚组分析显示,性别、年龄和透析状态均有一致的改善。华法林在治疗范围内的时间为44.4%。敏感性分析仍然缺乏足够的证据来确定5mg或2.5 mg剂量的阿哌沙班是否更好。结论:这项大型队列研究强调,在5期CKD患者或接受血液透析的患者中,阿哌沙班相关的脑血管事件和出血风险较低。然而,阿哌沙班的最佳剂量需要在未来的研究中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of conduction system pacing in dual-chamber Pacemakers in a CRT-indicated population: Primary analysis of the CORE-CPP study. Characterization of a successful transseptal access with an electrified guidewire: An ex vivo ovine study. Marshall-plan ablation strategy for recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with durably isolated pulmonary veins. Incidence and predictors of major arrhythmic events following acute myocarditis complicated by ventricular arrhythmias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparative 1-year outcomes of pentaspline versus circular array pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation with adjunctive atrial lines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1