Efficacy and Safety of DOACs versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease undergoing Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis.
Elísio Bulhões, Vanio L J Antunes, Carlos Alexandre, Maria L R Defante, Roberto Mazetto, Vinicius Oliveira, Pedro Antônio Sousa, Camila Guida, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca, Francisco Darrieux
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of DOACs versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease undergoing Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis.","authors":"Elísio Bulhões, Vanio L J Antunes, Carlos Alexandre, Maria L R Defante, Roberto Mazetto, Vinicius Oliveira, Pedro Antônio Sousa, Camila Guida, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca, Francisco Darrieux","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a relatively prevalent arrhythmia in patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis, who face a high risk of stroke and bleeding, and anticoagulation is a challenging decision. Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may offer advantages over warfarin K antagonists (VKAs), their use in this patient profile remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare DOACs and VKAs in patients with AF undergoing dialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were analyzed. The outcomes analyzed were total stroke (a composite of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke), ischemic stroke, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. R software (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed with I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 486 patients from 4 RCT studies. The median follow-up ranged from 5.8 to 18 months. Although a reduction in total stroke was observed in the group receiving DOACs (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.17 - 0.92; p=0.031; I2 =0%), no significant difference was found between the groups for ischemic stroke (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.17 - 1.04; p=0.062; I2 =0%). Additionally, a statistically significant reduction in major bleeding was noted in the DOAC group (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.41 - 0.98; p=0.044; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups for all-cause death (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.57 - 1.35; p=0.567; I2 =47%), cardiovascular death (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.60 - 2.10; p=0.700; I2 =0%), or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.67 - 1.84; p=0.669; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of total stroke and major bleeding. However, DOACs and VKA groups exhibited similar rates of ischemic stroke, all-cause and cardiovascular death, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a relatively prevalent arrhythmia in patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis, who face a high risk of stroke and bleeding, and anticoagulation is a challenging decision. Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may offer advantages over warfarin K antagonists (VKAs), their use in this patient profile remains unclear.
Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare DOACs and VKAs in patients with AF undergoing dialysis.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were analyzed. The outcomes analyzed were total stroke (a composite of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke), ischemic stroke, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. R software (version 4.3.2) was used for statistical analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.
Results: The final analysis included 486 patients from 4 RCT studies. The median follow-up ranged from 5.8 to 18 months. Although a reduction in total stroke was observed in the group receiving DOACs (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.17 - 0.92; p=0.031; I2 =0%), no significant difference was found between the groups for ischemic stroke (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.17 - 1.04; p=0.062; I2 =0%). Additionally, a statistically significant reduction in major bleeding was noted in the DOAC group (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.41 - 0.98; p=0.044; I2 = 0%). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups for all-cause death (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.57 - 1.35; p=0.567; I2 =47%), cardiovascular death (RR 1.13; 95% CI 0.60 - 2.10; p=0.700; I2 =0%), or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 1.11; 95% CI 0.67 - 1.84; p=0.669; I2 = 0%).
Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of total stroke and major bleeding. However, DOACs and VKA groups exhibited similar rates of ischemic stroke, all-cause and cardiovascular death, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.