Perineal and Rectal Nerve Recruitment Order Varies During Pudendal Neurostimulator Implant Surgery.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Neurourology and Urodynamics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1002/nau.70010
Po-Ju Chen, Amador C Lagunas, Vanessa Soriano, Priyanka Gupta, Tim M Bruns
{"title":"Perineal and Rectal Nerve Recruitment Order Varies During Pudendal Neurostimulator Implant Surgery.","authors":"Po-Ju Chen, Amador C Lagunas, Vanessa Soriano, Priyanka Gupta, Tim M Bruns","doi":"10.1002/nau.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pudendal nerve stimulation (PNS) is an off-label therapy for patients experiencing pelvic pain and voiding dysfunction. The pudendal nerve has two efferent branches to the rectum and perineum. Only the rectal branch is monitored via external anal sphincter electromyography during the implant procedure to help determine the lead position. We examined intraoperative PNS-driven urethral pressures to infer nerve recruitment order and tracked patient reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving PNS for pelvic pain and/or urinary symptoms were recruited. During the implant surgery, urethral pressure was measured with a multi-sensor pressure catheter placed in the lower urinary tract. PNS-driven changes in urethral pressure and external anal sphincter (EAS) electromyography were compared to determine the relative perineal and rectal nerve recruitment order. Participants completed pelvic pain, bladder, bowel, and sexual function surveys before and after the surgery. The primary outcome measure was the relative nerve recruitment order during PNS. Secondary outcome measures were the PNS-driven urethral responses and changes in survey symptom scores due to PNS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was collected from thirteen intraoperative sessions. Seven participants had rectal nerve recruitment first, four participants had perineal nerve recruitment first, and two participants had mixed nerve recruitment during intraoperative PNS. The average normalized urethral pressure change was 4.7% at the EAS threshold, 59.2% at twice EAS threshold, and 68.2% at three times the EAS threshold. Urethral pressure changes for each participant often varied between different active PNS electrodes. Participants had significant improvements in pelvic pain and bladder function survey scores with PNS (p < 0.04). There was no relationship between nerve recruitment order and changes in any surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PNS can recruit the perineal nerve before the rectal nerve. Each lead electrode may trigger different urethral response patterns within a participant. This study provided new insights into the effect of PNS on the recruitment of nerves in the pelvis and may help guide future surgical placement of PNS systems.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04236596).</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"851-859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pudendal nerve stimulation (PNS) is an off-label therapy for patients experiencing pelvic pain and voiding dysfunction. The pudendal nerve has two efferent branches to the rectum and perineum. Only the rectal branch is monitored via external anal sphincter electromyography during the implant procedure to help determine the lead position. We examined intraoperative PNS-driven urethral pressures to infer nerve recruitment order and tracked patient reported outcomes.

Methods: Patients receiving PNS for pelvic pain and/or urinary symptoms were recruited. During the implant surgery, urethral pressure was measured with a multi-sensor pressure catheter placed in the lower urinary tract. PNS-driven changes in urethral pressure and external anal sphincter (EAS) electromyography were compared to determine the relative perineal and rectal nerve recruitment order. Participants completed pelvic pain, bladder, bowel, and sexual function surveys before and after the surgery. The primary outcome measure was the relative nerve recruitment order during PNS. Secondary outcome measures were the PNS-driven urethral responses and changes in survey symptom scores due to PNS.

Results: Data was collected from thirteen intraoperative sessions. Seven participants had rectal nerve recruitment first, four participants had perineal nerve recruitment first, and two participants had mixed nerve recruitment during intraoperative PNS. The average normalized urethral pressure change was 4.7% at the EAS threshold, 59.2% at twice EAS threshold, and 68.2% at three times the EAS threshold. Urethral pressure changes for each participant often varied between different active PNS electrodes. Participants had significant improvements in pelvic pain and bladder function survey scores with PNS (p < 0.04). There was no relationship between nerve recruitment order and changes in any surveys.

Conclusion: PNS can recruit the perineal nerve before the rectal nerve. Each lead electrode may trigger different urethral response patterns within a participant. This study provided new insights into the effect of PNS on the recruitment of nerves in the pelvis and may help guide future surgical placement of PNS systems.

Clinical trial registration: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04236596).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴部神经刺激器植入手术中会阴和直肠神经恢复顺序不同。
阴部神经刺激(PNS)是治疗盆腔疼痛和排尿功能障碍患者的一种适应症外治疗方法。阴部神经有两个分支连接直肠和会阴。在植入过程中,仅通过肛门外括约肌肌电图监测直肠分支,以帮助确定导联位置。我们检查术中pns驱动的尿道压力来推断神经恢复顺序,并跟踪患者报告的结果。方法:招募因盆腔疼痛和/或泌尿系统症状而接受PNS治疗的患者。在植入手术中,通过放置在下尿路的多传感器压力导管测量尿道压力。比较pns驱动的尿道压力变化和肛门外括约肌(EAS)肌电图,确定会阴和直肠神经的相对恢复顺序。参与者在手术前后完成盆腔疼痛、膀胱、肠道和性功能调查。主要观察指标为PNS期间的相对神经恢复顺序。次要结果测量是PNS驱动的尿道反应和由于PNS引起的调查症状评分的变化。结果:收集了13次术中数据。术中PNS中有7例患者先恢复直肠神经,4例患者先恢复会阴神经,2例患者有混合神经恢复。正常尿道压力变化在EAS阈值时平均为4.7%,在2次EAS阈值时为59.2%,在3次EAS阈值时为68.2%。每个参与者的尿道压力变化在不同的PNS电极之间经常发生变化。经PNS治疗的受试者盆腔疼痛和膀胱功能评分均有显著改善(p)。结论:PNS可先于直肠神经招募会阴神经。每个铅电极可能触发参与者不同的尿道反应模式。本研究为PNS对骨盆神经募集的影响提供了新的见解,并可能有助于指导未来PNS系统的手术安置。临床试验注册:本研究已在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT04236596)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
期刊最新文献
In-Depth Real-World Evidence: Assembling a Comprehensive Spinal Cord Injury or Disease Veteran Cohort to Advance Understanding of Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction. Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Microvesicles Ameliorate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Cystitis via Inhibiting Pyroptosis and Ferroptosis in Rats. Assessment of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Acupuncture in Treating Postpartum Urinary Retention: A Comprehensive Approach Integrating Systematic Review and Association Rule Analysis. Utility of Pelvic Floor Therapy and Behavioral Interventions in the Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (NLUTD) Population. Surgical Outcomes of Transurethral Bladder Neck Incision and Resection in Female Primary Bladder Neck Obstruction: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1