Study of the effect of different diluents for syringe immersion test on Rhipicephalus microplus larvae against macrocyclic lactones.

IF 1 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Open Veterinary Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i12.24
Diego Robaina, Jessica Caballero, Gonzalo Suárez
{"title":"Study of the effect of different diluents for syringe immersion test on <i>Rhipicephalus microplus</i> larvae against macrocyclic lactones.","authors":"Diego Robaina, Jessica Caballero, Gonzalo Suárez","doi":"10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i12.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Macrocyclic lactones (MLs) are pharmaceutical compounds extensively utilized in the management of <i>Rhipicephalus microplus</i> tick infestations in bovine populations. It is of paramount importance to prevent or delay the development of drug resistance to ML. <i>In vitro</i> techniques are validated by FAO and can serve as an orientative diagnosis of the resistance developed in field conditions. Diluent selection must be considered when sensitivity on field strains is being studied. The syringe immersion test (SIT) is a modification of the larval immersion test where syringes are used seeking to reduce the workload.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Study the interchangeability of two diluents in the diagnosis of sensitivity to MLs on <i>R. microplus</i> larvae using the SIT technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dose-response curves were adjusted using SIT with MLs, on different diluents [acetone (ACT) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)] on Mozo strain (standard susceptible strain). Slope, potency, and discriminating concentration were estimated for each drug on both diluents. A four-parameter log-logistic model was applied for model fitting. The ratio between estimated parameters was used to compare results. Field strains were tested on both diluents for each drug, using the discriminating concentration estimated for Mozo strain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the Mozo strain, dose-response models were adjusted for each drug on both diluents using SIT. Ivermectin (IVM) and doramectin (DRM) showed no significant difference in slope when comparing diluents (<i>p</i> > 0.05); moxidectin (MOX) presents a higher sensitivity for DMSO versus IVM (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significant differences occur when comparing DRM with MOX in both diluents. Potency does not differ for avermectins using ACT 1%, and MOX has a higher potency than avermectins (<i>p</i> < 0.05). On field populations, we found an increase in larval mortality when using DMSO as opposed to ACT (<i>p</i> < 0.05) for IVM, DRM, and MOX, a differential sensitivity to detect larvae with survival capacity at equal levels of lethal concentration in both diluents for the same drug on Mozo strain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that the SIT technique is a tool capable of detecting susceptibility/resistance in <i>R. microplus</i> populations regardless of the diluent used.</p>","PeriodicalId":19531,"journal":{"name":"Open Veterinary Journal","volume":"14 12","pages":"3397-3403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i12.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Macrocyclic lactones (MLs) are pharmaceutical compounds extensively utilized in the management of Rhipicephalus microplus tick infestations in bovine populations. It is of paramount importance to prevent or delay the development of drug resistance to ML. In vitro techniques are validated by FAO and can serve as an orientative diagnosis of the resistance developed in field conditions. Diluent selection must be considered when sensitivity on field strains is being studied. The syringe immersion test (SIT) is a modification of the larval immersion test where syringes are used seeking to reduce the workload.

Aim: Study the interchangeability of two diluents in the diagnosis of sensitivity to MLs on R. microplus larvae using the SIT technique.

Methods: Dose-response curves were adjusted using SIT with MLs, on different diluents [acetone (ACT) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)] on Mozo strain (standard susceptible strain). Slope, potency, and discriminating concentration were estimated for each drug on both diluents. A four-parameter log-logistic model was applied for model fitting. The ratio between estimated parameters was used to compare results. Field strains were tested on both diluents for each drug, using the discriminating concentration estimated for Mozo strain.

Results: For the Mozo strain, dose-response models were adjusted for each drug on both diluents using SIT. Ivermectin (IVM) and doramectin (DRM) showed no significant difference in slope when comparing diluents (p > 0.05); moxidectin (MOX) presents a higher sensitivity for DMSO versus IVM (p < 0.05). Significant differences occur when comparing DRM with MOX in both diluents. Potency does not differ for avermectins using ACT 1%, and MOX has a higher potency than avermectins (p < 0.05). On field populations, we found an increase in larval mortality when using DMSO as opposed to ACT (p < 0.05) for IVM, DRM, and MOX, a differential sensitivity to detect larvae with survival capacity at equal levels of lethal concentration in both diluents for the same drug on Mozo strain.

Conclusion: We conclude that the SIT technique is a tool capable of detecting susceptibility/resistance in R. microplus populations regardless of the diluent used.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同稀释剂针浸试验对微头绦虫幼虫对大环内酯的影响研究。
背景:大环内酯(MLs)是一种广泛应用于牛种群微头蜱感染管理的药物化合物。预防或延缓对ML产生耐药性至关重要。体外技术已得到粮农组织的验证,可作为在田间条件下产生耐药性的定向诊断。在研究对现场菌株的敏感性时,必须考虑稀释剂的选择。注射器浸液试验(SIT)是对幼虫浸液试验的改进,其中使用注射器以减少工作量。目的:研究两种稀释剂的互换性,应用SIT技术诊断微氏夜蛾幼虫对MLs的敏感性。方法:在不同稀释剂[丙酮(ACT)和二甲亚砜(DMSO)]条件下,对Mozo菌株(标准敏感菌株)进行剂量-反应曲线调整。在两种稀释剂上估计每种药物的斜率、效价和鉴别浓度。采用四参数logistic模型进行模型拟合。估计参数之间的比值用于比较结果。使用Mozo菌株估计的鉴别浓度,对每种药物的两种稀释液进行现场菌株测试。结果:对于Mozo菌株,使用SIT调整了每种药物在两种稀释液上的剂量反应模型。伊维菌素(IVM)与多拉菌素(DRM)在稀释液中斜率差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05);moxidectin (MOX)对DMSO的敏感性高于IVM (p < 0.05)。在两种稀释剂中比较DRM和MOX时,会出现显著差异。1% ACT对阿维菌素的效价无显著影响,MOX的效价高于阿维菌素(p < 0.05)。在野外种群中,我们发现与ACT相比,使用DMSO对IVM、DRM和MOX的幼虫死亡率有所增加(p < 0.05),这是一种差异敏感性,用于检测Mozo菌株在同一药物的两种稀释剂中相同致死浓度水平下具有生存能力的幼虫。结论:无论使用何种稀释剂,SIT技术都是一种能够检测微加河鼠群体药敏/耐药性的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Veterinary Journal
Open Veterinary Journal VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Veterinary Journal is a peer-reviewed international open access online and printed journal that publishes high-quality original research articles. reviews, short communications and case reports dedicated to all aspects of veterinary sciences and its related subjects. Research areas include the following: Infectious diseases of zoonotic/food-borne importance, applied biochemistry, parasitology, endocrinology, microbiology, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, epidemiology, molecular biology, immunogenetics, surgery, ophthalmology, dermatology, oncology and animal reproduction. All papers are peer-reviewed. Moreover, with the presence of well-qualified group of international referees, the process of publication will be done meticulously and to the highest standards.
期刊最新文献
Biosurveillance of avian orthoavulavirus 1 in multiple avian species in Pakistan from 2011 to 2021. C3H mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: Blood markers, proteomic biomarkers, cognitive ability, and histopathology. Assessing the dosage and application strategies of Eucalyptus globulus oil for controlling Varroa destructor in honey bee colonies. Camels' antibody response to botulinum toxin-A (Botox). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. Isolated from retail seafood in Hanoi, Vietnam.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1