Failure Rate of Meniscal Repair With ACL Reconstruction Among Professional Athletes: A Study of 196 Patients From the SANTI Study Group With a Mean Follow-up of 96 Months.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241308591
Jae-Sung An, Mohammed Lahsika, Alice Nlandu, Giancarlo Giurazza, Julien Chamoux, Marc Barrera Uso, Silvia Cardarelli, Thais Dutra Vieira, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
{"title":"Failure Rate of Meniscal Repair With ACL Reconstruction Among Professional Athletes: A Study of 196 Patients From the SANTI Study Group With a Mean Follow-up of 96 Months.","authors":"Jae-Sung An, Mohammed Lahsika, Alice Nlandu, Giancarlo Giurazza, Julien Chamoux, Marc Barrera Uso, Silvia Cardarelli, Thais Dutra Vieira, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet","doi":"10.1177/23259671241308591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is still controversy regarding the ideal management method for meniscal tears combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, especially for professional athletes.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>To (1) describe the incidence of secondary meniscectomy in professional athletes after undergoing meniscal repair concomitant to primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) identify the associated risk factors for repair failure of the medial meniscus (MM) and/or lateral meniscus (LM) in this population at long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective comparative study. Included were professional athletes who underwent arthroscopic primary ACLR and repair of MM and/or LM tears between January 2013 and December 2022and who had ≥2 years of follow-up. Risk factors associated with secondary meniscectomy were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 230 professional athletes (mean ± SD age, 23.3 ± 5.0 years; mean Tegner score, 9.3 ± 1.0) who underwent primary ACLR, 196 patients (85.2%) also had meniscal repair. The most common type of graft used was hamstring tendon (74%), and 74% of patients underwent a concomitant lateral extra-articular procedure. Among the 196 patients with meniscal lesions, 37% had LM lesions, 29% had MM lesions, and 34% had both LM and MM lesions. LM tears were repaired in 92.8% of cases, while 7.2% were left in situ. The most common type of repair for LM tears was the all-inside technique. MM tears were repaired in 97.6% of cases, with 2.4% left alone. The most common type of repair for MM tears was the suture hook technique, and no meniscectomies were performed. At a mean follow-up of 95.8 ± 45.1 months, 26 patients (13.3%) underwent a secondary meniscectomy: 7 (5.0%) for LM and 19 (15.4%) for MM. A Cox model revealed no significant risk factors associated with secondary lateral or medial meniscectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At long-term follow-up, the meniscal repair failure rate in this population of patients who underwent primary ACLR was 13.2% overall, 5% for LM tears and 15.4% for MM tears. No risk factors for secondary meniscectomy were found.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"23259671241308591"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241308591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is still controversy regarding the ideal management method for meniscal tears combined with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, especially for professional athletes.

Purposes: To (1) describe the incidence of secondary meniscectomy in professional athletes after undergoing meniscal repair concomitant to primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) identify the associated risk factors for repair failure of the medial meniscus (MM) and/or lateral meniscus (LM) in this population at long-term follow-up.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: This was a retrospective comparative study. Included were professional athletes who underwent arthroscopic primary ACLR and repair of MM and/or LM tears between January 2013 and December 2022and who had ≥2 years of follow-up. Risk factors associated with secondary meniscectomy were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: Out of 230 professional athletes (mean ± SD age, 23.3 ± 5.0 years; mean Tegner score, 9.3 ± 1.0) who underwent primary ACLR, 196 patients (85.2%) also had meniscal repair. The most common type of graft used was hamstring tendon (74%), and 74% of patients underwent a concomitant lateral extra-articular procedure. Among the 196 patients with meniscal lesions, 37% had LM lesions, 29% had MM lesions, and 34% had both LM and MM lesions. LM tears were repaired in 92.8% of cases, while 7.2% were left in situ. The most common type of repair for LM tears was the all-inside technique. MM tears were repaired in 97.6% of cases, with 2.4% left alone. The most common type of repair for MM tears was the suture hook technique, and no meniscectomies were performed. At a mean follow-up of 95.8 ± 45.1 months, 26 patients (13.3%) underwent a secondary meniscectomy: 7 (5.0%) for LM and 19 (15.4%) for MM. A Cox model revealed no significant risk factors associated with secondary lateral or medial meniscectomy.

Conclusion: At long-term follow-up, the meniscal repair failure rate in this population of patients who underwent primary ACLR was 13.2% overall, 5% for LM tears and 15.4% for MM tears. No risk factors for secondary meniscectomy were found.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
The Role of Isolated Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis in Managing Residual Pivot Shift After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and a New Medial Meniscal Tear. Evaluating Donor-Recipient Sex Mismatch in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Allograft: Outcomes at 2 Years Postoperatively. Failure Rate of Meniscal Repair With ACL Reconstruction Among Professional Athletes: A Study of 196 Patients From the SANTI Study Group With a Mean Follow-up of 96 Months. Incidence and Risk Factors for Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Primary ACL Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients: A National Database Study. Outcomes After Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation and an Accelerated Rehabilitation Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1