Carole Forlini, Farah Koraichi-Emeriau, Barbara G Schmitt, Wendy Koch, Shawn Seidel, Eckart Gura, Michael Haack, Dorothea Eigler
{"title":"Applicability of the in vitro skin irritation methods (EpiSkin™, EpiDerm™ SIT) to organosilicon-based substances.","authors":"Carole Forlini, Farah Koraichi-Emeriau, Barbara G Schmitt, Wendy Koch, Shawn Seidel, Eckart Gura, Michael Haack, Dorothea Eigler","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is now widely accepted that the reconstructed human epidermis models (OECD TG 439) can be used as a standalone replacement of the in vivo rabbit assay (OECD TG 404) to accurately predict skin irritancy. Many legislations have now introduced the legal requirement to use in vitro methods as the first step. The applicability of these methods to organosilicon-based substances was not evaluated during the validation of this guideline. Therefore, the aim of the current work was to assess the applicability of EpiSkin™ and EpiDerm™ SIT in vitro methods for organosilicons. Ten substances were evaluated, and results were compared with existing rabbit data. The data showed that both test methods failed to accurately predict the in vivo skin irritation potential, with predictive capacities below the minimum test guideline requirements. The two models delivered consistent results in only 60% of the cases. Several hypotheses were explored to explain this high rate of discordance without success. As EpiDerm™ SIT showed 100% sensitivity, a new stepwise testing strategy is proposed for organosilicons consisting of starting with EpiDerm™ SIT, following by EpiSkin™ in case of positive outcome. While keeping protective, this adapted strategy avoids unnecessary animal testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105778"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105778","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is now widely accepted that the reconstructed human epidermis models (OECD TG 439) can be used as a standalone replacement of the in vivo rabbit assay (OECD TG 404) to accurately predict skin irritancy. Many legislations have now introduced the legal requirement to use in vitro methods as the first step. The applicability of these methods to organosilicon-based substances was not evaluated during the validation of this guideline. Therefore, the aim of the current work was to assess the applicability of EpiSkin™ and EpiDerm™ SIT in vitro methods for organosilicons. Ten substances were evaluated, and results were compared with existing rabbit data. The data showed that both test methods failed to accurately predict the in vivo skin irritation potential, with predictive capacities below the minimum test guideline requirements. The two models delivered consistent results in only 60% of the cases. Several hypotheses were explored to explain this high rate of discordance without success. As EpiDerm™ SIT showed 100% sensitivity, a new stepwise testing strategy is proposed for organosilicons consisting of starting with EpiDerm™ SIT, following by EpiSkin™ in case of positive outcome. While keeping protective, this adapted strategy avoids unnecessary animal testing.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)