Dual-Source Computed Tomography Angiography versus Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Diagnosis of Spinal Vascular Malformations: A Retrospective Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123745
Jinyu Zhu , Wangshu Zhu , Minghua Li , Xiaoer Wei , Zheyi Chen , Yuehua Li
{"title":"Dual-Source Computed Tomography Angiography versus Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Diagnosis of Spinal Vascular Malformations: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Jinyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Wangshu Zhu ,&nbsp;Minghua Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoer Wei ,&nbsp;Zheyi Chen ,&nbsp;Yuehua Li","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the performance of time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST-MRA) and dual-source CT angiography (CTA), applied independently and in combination, for preoperative assessment of spinal vascular malformation (SVM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 77 patients with suspected SVM who underwent TWIST-MRA, CTA, and digital subtraction angiography between September 2019 and December 2022. Precision recall curve analysis was used to assess diagnostic performance. The feeding artery and fistula location were evaluated using radiologist confidence level by CTA and TWIST-MRA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 77 patients, 71 had digital subtraction angiography-confirmed SVM (cervical, n = 7; thoracolumbar, n = 60; deep lumbosacral, n = 4) and 6 did not have SVM. Both TWIST-MRA and CTA showed excellent accuracy (96.1% vs. 94.8%) and sensitivity (98.6% vs. 97.2%) for diagnosis of SVM subtypes. TWIST-MRA performed slightly better than CTA in identifying the feeding artery and fistula (area under the curve-precision recall, 0.958 vs. 0.944); however, sensitivity was not statistically different (<em>P</em> = 0.512). Among SVM patients, the radiologist confidence levels in identifying feeding artery and fistula of SVMs were significantly higher with CTA+TWIST-MRA than with TWIST-MRA alone (<em>P</em> = 0.007). The radiologist confidence levels were significantly higher with CTA alone and CTA+TWIST-MRA compared to TWIST-MRA alone for fistula identification of cervical and deep lumbosacral SVMs (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both TWIST-MRA and CTA are reliable for diagnosing SVM and localizing the feeding artery and fistula. While TWIST-MRA remains the primary technique, the addition of CTA can improve diagnostic confidence. CTA may be considered as an alternative to TWIST-MRA for SVMs in the cervical and lumbosacral regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 123745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025001019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the performance of time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories (TWIST-MRA) and dual-source CT angiography (CTA), applied independently and in combination, for preoperative assessment of spinal vascular malformation (SVM).

Methods

This retrospective study included 77 patients with suspected SVM who underwent TWIST-MRA, CTA, and digital subtraction angiography between September 2019 and December 2022. Precision recall curve analysis was used to assess diagnostic performance. The feeding artery and fistula location were evaluated using radiologist confidence level by CTA and TWIST-MRA.

Results

Among the 77 patients, 71 had digital subtraction angiography-confirmed SVM (cervical, n = 7; thoracolumbar, n = 60; deep lumbosacral, n = 4) and 6 did not have SVM. Both TWIST-MRA and CTA showed excellent accuracy (96.1% vs. 94.8%) and sensitivity (98.6% vs. 97.2%) for diagnosis of SVM subtypes. TWIST-MRA performed slightly better than CTA in identifying the feeding artery and fistula (area under the curve-precision recall, 0.958 vs. 0.944); however, sensitivity was not statistically different (P = 0.512). Among SVM patients, the radiologist confidence levels in identifying feeding artery and fistula of SVMs were significantly higher with CTA+TWIST-MRA than with TWIST-MRA alone (P = 0.007). The radiologist confidence levels were significantly higher with CTA alone and CTA+TWIST-MRA compared to TWIST-MRA alone for fistula identification of cervical and deep lumbosacral SVMs (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Both TWIST-MRA and CTA are reliable for diagnosing SVM and localizing the feeding artery and fistula. While TWIST-MRA remains the primary technique, the addition of CTA can improve diagnostic confidence. CTA may be considered as an alternative to TWIST-MRA for SVMs in the cervical and lumbosacral regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双源CT血管造影与MR血管造影诊断脊柱血管畸形的回顾性研究。
目的:探讨随机轨迹时间分辨血管造影(TWIST-MRA)和双源CT血管造影(CTA)分别独立应用和联合应用在SVM术前评估中的效果。方法:回顾性分析2019年9月至2022年12月期间接受TWIST-MRA、CTA和数字减影血管造影(DSA)检查的77例疑似SVM患者。采用精确召回率(PR)曲线分析评价诊断效果。通过CTA和TWIST-MRA采用放射科医师置信度评估供血动脉和瘘管位置。结果:77例患者中,71例dsa证实SVM(宫颈,n = 7;胸腰椎,n = 60;深腰骶部,n = 4)和6个没有支持向量机。TWIST-MRA和CTA对SVM亚型的诊断准确率(96.1%对94.8%)和灵敏度(98.6%对97.2%)均较好。TWIST-MRA对供血动脉和瘘管位置的识别略优于CTA (AUC-PR, 0.958 vs 0.944)。在支持向量机患者中,CTA+TWIST-MRA对瘘管的定位效果明显优于单独使用TWIST-MRA (P = .007)。与单独使用TWIST-MRA相比,单独使用CTA和CTA+TWIST-MRA识别颈椎和腰骶深区瘘的放射科医生的置信水平明显更高(P < 0.001)。结论:TWIST-MRA和双源CTA对支持向量机的诊断和供血动脉及瘘的定位都是可靠的。TWIST-MRA仍然是SVM术前诊断的主要技术,双源CTA的加入可以提高诊断置信度。CTA可以作为TWIST-MRA在颈椎和腰骶区SVMs的替代选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients with Acromegaly: An MRI-Based Case-Control Study GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Long-Term Survival after Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Type 2 Diabetes Capturing Stereoscopic Three-Dimensional Images with a Cellphone Camera for Neuroanatomical Documentation: A Step-by-Step Guide Are We Missing the Bigger Comorbidity Picture? Metabolic Syndrome Worsens Alignment and Increases Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Endoscopic Trans-Costovertebral Approach to Thoracic Discectomy for Central Calcified Disc Herniations: A Technical Note
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1