Verifying Clinical Benefit of New Anticancer Drugs After Regulatory Approval Based on Exploratory Studies.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s43441-025-00757-3
Akira Ito, Mamoru Narukawa
{"title":"Verifying Clinical Benefit of New Anticancer Drugs After Regulatory Approval Based on Exploratory Studies.","authors":"Akira Ito, Mamoru Narukawa","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00757-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, anticancer drugs are often approved based on the objective response rate (ORR) when the conduct of a confirmatory study is difficult or expected to take a considerably long time. However, it remains unclear how frequently post-marketing confirmatory studies are conducted and for which indications they are implemented. We aimed to understand the status of post-marketing confirmatory studies for anticancer drugs approved based on ORR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the status of post-marketing confirmatory studies on anticancer drug indications approved based on ORR in Japan between 2015 and 2022. In addition, we compared the status of post-marketing requirements and subsequent regulatory actions between Japan and the US for the indications commonly approved in both countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 60% of the indications did not have planned confirmatory studies, with many receiving orphan drug designations. This observation is consistent with the Japanese regulations that allow the approval of anticancer drugs based on ORR, for which confirmatory studies are difficult to conduct or expected to take a long time. Indications received conditional approval in Japan were fewer compared to those received accelerated approval in the US, and post-marketing confirmatory studies were less frequently requested from the regulatory authority in Japan. Although the results of post-marketing confirmatory studies were often utilized in regulatory actions in Japan (including modifications to approved indications), no indications were found where these results led to withdrawal of approval or additional confirmatory study requirements, and the evaluations of the results were not disclosed when they did not lead to regulatory actions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To facilitate smoother regulatory actions based on the results of post-marketing confirmatory studies, it would be beneficial to require the submission of the results of post-marketing confirmatory studies if it is feasible following the approval based on ORR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"542-548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00757-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Japan, anticancer drugs are often approved based on the objective response rate (ORR) when the conduct of a confirmatory study is difficult or expected to take a considerably long time. However, it remains unclear how frequently post-marketing confirmatory studies are conducted and for which indications they are implemented. We aimed to understand the status of post-marketing confirmatory studies for anticancer drugs approved based on ORR.

Methods: We investigated the status of post-marketing confirmatory studies on anticancer drug indications approved based on ORR in Japan between 2015 and 2022. In addition, we compared the status of post-marketing requirements and subsequent regulatory actions between Japan and the US for the indications commonly approved in both countries.

Results: We found that 60% of the indications did not have planned confirmatory studies, with many receiving orphan drug designations. This observation is consistent with the Japanese regulations that allow the approval of anticancer drugs based on ORR, for which confirmatory studies are difficult to conduct or expected to take a long time. Indications received conditional approval in Japan were fewer compared to those received accelerated approval in the US, and post-marketing confirmatory studies were less frequently requested from the regulatory authority in Japan. Although the results of post-marketing confirmatory studies were often utilized in regulatory actions in Japan (including modifications to approved indications), no indications were found where these results led to withdrawal of approval or additional confirmatory study requirements, and the evaluations of the results were not disclosed when they did not lead to regulatory actions.

Conclusions: To facilitate smoother regulatory actions based on the results of post-marketing confirmatory studies, it would be beneficial to require the submission of the results of post-marketing confirmatory studies if it is feasible following the approval based on ORR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于探索性研究的新药审批后临床获益验证
背景:在日本,当进行确证性研究很困难或预计需要相当长的时间时,通常根据客观缓解率(ORR)批准抗癌药物。然而,目前尚不清楚上市后验证性研究进行的频率以及针对哪些适应症进行验证性研究。我们旨在了解基于ORR批准的抗癌药物上市后验证性研究的现状。方法:我们调查了2015年至2022年日本基于ORR批准的抗癌药物适应症上市后验证性研究的现状。此外,我们比较了日本和美国上市后要求的现状和随后在两国批准的适应症的监管行动。结果:我们发现60%的适应症没有计划的确证性研究,其中许多是孤儿药。这一观察结果与日本允许基于ORR批准抗癌药物的法规是一致的,因为很难进行验证性研究或预计需要很长时间。与在美国获得加速批准的适应症相比,在日本获得有条件批准的适应症较少,并且日本监管机构要求上市后验证研究的频率较低。尽管上市后验证性研究的结果经常用于日本的监管行动(包括对已批准适应症的修改),但没有发现这些结果导致撤销批准或额外验证性研究要求的适应症,并且当结果不导致监管行动时,也没有披露对结果的评估。结论:为了促进基于上市后验证研究结果的更顺利的监管行动,如果在基于ORR的批准之后可行的话,要求提交上市后验证研究结果将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Regulatory Approaches to Electronic Labelling in the USA, EU, and India: A Comparative Overview. Statistical Guardrails for Hybrid-Controlled Trials: Robust to Confounding and Between-Study Heterogeneity. Letter to the Editor: Battle Won but War Lost for Barth Syndrome Patients. Research on the Quality Evaluation Indicators of Real-World Data in the Review of Anti-Tumor Drugs for Chinese Regulatory Frameworks. An NCI Micro-credentialing Model for Onboarding and Training Clinical Research Professionals in a Lean Fiscal Environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1