Risk factors for urinary septic shock following ureteroscopy for stone disease.

Ameer Nsair, Michael Mullerad, Oleg Goldin, Gilad E Amiel, Michael Reumi, Kamil Malshy, Azik Hoffman
{"title":"Risk factors for urinary septic shock following ureteroscopy for stone disease.","authors":"Ameer Nsair, Michael Mullerad, Oleg Goldin, Gilad E Amiel, Michael Reumi, Kamil Malshy, Azik Hoffman","doi":"10.1177/17504589251318120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to identify risk factors associated with urinary septic shock following ureteroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent ureteroscopy between 2010 and 2021. Data collected included demographics and preoperative variables. Septic shock was defined as the need for vasopressors for sepsis. A comparison was made between patients who developed septic shock and a randomly selected control group (N = 115). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5000 ureteroscopy procedures, 20 cases of septic shock were identified. These patients were older, had a higher median body mass index, more hypertension, higher preoperative urinary drainage, longer drainage duration and positive preoperative urine cultures. On multivariate analysis, age over 55 years, body mass index above 26 and positive preoperative urine culture were significant predictors of septic shock.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent with findings reported in previous studies, older age, higher body mass index and positive preoperative urine cultures are key risk factors for postureteroscopy septic shock. Enhanced safety measures are essential for high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589251318120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589251318120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to identify risk factors associated with urinary septic shock following ureteroscopy.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent ureteroscopy between 2010 and 2021. Data collected included demographics and preoperative variables. Septic shock was defined as the need for vasopressors for sepsis. A comparison was made between patients who developed septic shock and a randomly selected control group (N = 115). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors.

Results: Of 5000 ureteroscopy procedures, 20 cases of septic shock were identified. These patients were older, had a higher median body mass index, more hypertension, higher preoperative urinary drainage, longer drainage duration and positive preoperative urine cultures. On multivariate analysis, age over 55 years, body mass index above 26 and positive preoperative urine culture were significant predictors of septic shock.

Conclusion: Consistent with findings reported in previous studies, older age, higher body mass index and positive preoperative urine cultures are key risk factors for postureteroscopy septic shock. Enhanced safety measures are essential for high-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾结石患者输尿管镜检查后尿毒性休克的危险因素
目的:我们旨在确定输尿管镜检查后尿毒性休克的相关危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2010年至2021年输尿管镜检查患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学和术前变量。脓毒性休克被定义为需要血管加压药治疗脓毒症。将发生脓毒性休克的患者与随机选择的对照组(N = 115)进行比较。采用多因素logistic回归确定独立危险因素。结果:在5000例输尿管镜检查中,发现20例脓毒性休克。这些患者年龄较大,中位体重指数较高,高血压较多,术前尿引流率较高,引流时间较长,术前尿培养阳性。在多因素分析中,年龄大于55岁、体重指数大于26和术前尿培养阳性是脓毒性休克的重要预测因素。结论:与既往研究结果一致,年龄大、体重指数高、术前尿培养阳性是输尿管镜后脓毒性休克的关键危险因素。加强安全措施对高危患者至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
期刊最新文献
Nurse education on sedation management in ECMO: A small-group training approach. Perioperative anaesthetic management of a massive solitary fibrous tumour of the pleura: A case report. Beneath the surface: A historical exploration of trepanation practices across cultures and eras. Perioperative surveillance of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery in patients with hip fracture: A retrospective cohort study. Appropriate tourniquet use in surgery: A literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1