Comparative Evaluation of Ozone Water and Glutaraldehyde on Surface Detail Reproduction of Vinyl Polyether Silicone Impression Materials at Different Time Intervals.

IF 0.9 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1318_24
Kriti Shankar, Savita Dandekeri, Rajesh Shetty, Kevin Fernandes, Sanath Kumar Shetty, Mallikarjuna Ragher
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Ozone Water and Glutaraldehyde on Surface Detail Reproduction of Vinyl Polyether Silicone Impression Materials at Different Time Intervals.","authors":"Kriti Shankar, Savita Dandekeri, Rajesh Shetty, Kevin Fernandes, Sanath Kumar Shetty, Mallikarjuna Ragher","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1318_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to evaluate the impact of chemical disinfection using ozone water and glutaraldehyde on the surface detail reproduction (SDR) of vinyl polyether silicone (VPES) impression material at different time intervals.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>VPES impressions were categorized into light-body and heavy-body groups and further divided based on the disinfectant used (ozone water or glutaraldehyde) and the time interval of disinfection (T1: 15 minutes and T2: 24 hours). A total of 80 impressions (40 light-body and 40 heavy-body) were prepared and subjected to the respective disinfection protocols. The SDR was evaluated using a standard scoring system to determine the quality of detail reproduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ozone water demonstrated superior performance in preserving surface detail compared to glutaraldehyde at both T1 and T2 for both light-body VPES and heavy-body VPES. Light-body VPES showed better SDR scores compared to heavy-body VPES across all conditions. Specifically, for light-body VPES, the mean SDR scores at T1 were significantly better for ozone water compared to glutaraldehyde (mean scores: 1.00 vs. 1.27, <i>P</i> = 0.046). For heavy-body VPES, ozone water also performed better at T1 compared to glutaraldehyde (mean scores: 1.27 vs. 1.67, <i>P</i> = 0.034). Disinfection at T1 resulted in better SDR scores compared to T2 for both light-body VPES and heavy-body VPES.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ozone water is a more effective disinfectant than glutaraldehyde for preserving the surface detail of VPES impressions, especially when disinfection is conducted for a shorter duration (15 minutes).</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 4","pages":"S3837-S3839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1318_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to evaluate the impact of chemical disinfection using ozone water and glutaraldehyde on the surface detail reproduction (SDR) of vinyl polyether silicone (VPES) impression material at different time intervals.

Methodology: VPES impressions were categorized into light-body and heavy-body groups and further divided based on the disinfectant used (ozone water or glutaraldehyde) and the time interval of disinfection (T1: 15 minutes and T2: 24 hours). A total of 80 impressions (40 light-body and 40 heavy-body) were prepared and subjected to the respective disinfection protocols. The SDR was evaluated using a standard scoring system to determine the quality of detail reproduction.

Results: Ozone water demonstrated superior performance in preserving surface detail compared to glutaraldehyde at both T1 and T2 for both light-body VPES and heavy-body VPES. Light-body VPES showed better SDR scores compared to heavy-body VPES across all conditions. Specifically, for light-body VPES, the mean SDR scores at T1 were significantly better for ozone water compared to glutaraldehyde (mean scores: 1.00 vs. 1.27, P = 0.046). For heavy-body VPES, ozone water also performed better at T1 compared to glutaraldehyde (mean scores: 1.27 vs. 1.67, P = 0.034). Disinfection at T1 resulted in better SDR scores compared to T2 for both light-body VPES and heavy-body VPES.

Conclusion: Ozone water is a more effective disinfectant than glutaraldehyde for preserving the surface detail of VPES impressions, especially when disinfection is conducted for a shorter duration (15 minutes).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
臭氧水和戊二醛在不同时间间隔对乙烯基聚醚硅酮压印材料表面细节再现的比较评价。
目的:研究臭氧水和戊二醛化学消毒对乙烯基聚醚硅树脂(VPES)印模材料不同时间间隔表面细节再现(SDR)的影响。方法:根据使用的消毒剂(臭氧水或戊二醛)和消毒时间间隔(T1: 15分钟,T2: 24小时),将VPES印片分为轻体组和重体组。共准备了80份印染物(40份轻体印染物和40份重体印染物),并按照各自的消毒方案进行消毒。使用标准评分系统对SDR进行评估,以确定细节再现的质量。结果:与戊二醛相比,臭氧水在T1和T2时对轻体VPES和重体VPES的表面细节都有更好的保存性能。与重型VPES相比,轻型VPES在所有条件下都表现出更好的SDR得分。具体而言,对于轻体VPES,臭氧水在T1时的平均SDR评分明显优于戊二醛(平均评分:1.00比1.27,P = 0.046)。对于重体VPES,臭氧水在T1时的表现也优于戊二醛(平均得分:1.27比1.67,P = 0.034)。与T2相比,T1消毒对轻体VPES和重体VPES的SDR评分都更高。结论:臭氧水是一种比戊二醛更有效的消毒剂,尤其当消毒时间较短(15分钟)时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Vertical Marginal Fit of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Obtained Using Intraoral Scanning vs Monophase Impression Technique: An In Vivo Study. A Prospective Study on Longevity of Different Post and Core Systems in Endodontically Treated Teeth. A Prospective Analysis of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Term Pregnancies Complicated by Oligohydramnios at Bundelkhand Medical College. A Review of the Causes of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding in Children Undergoing UGI Endoscopies-A Single Center Study from South India. A Cross-sectional Study of Awareness about Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications among Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1