Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Dementia: Evidence Triangulation from a Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Mendelian Randomization Study.

Di Liu, Mei Ling Cao, Shan Shan Wu, Bing Li Li, Yi Wen Jiang, Teng Fei Lin, Fu Xiao Li, Wei Jie Cao, Jin Qiu Yuan, Feng Sha, Zhi Rong Yang, Jin Ling Tang
{"title":"Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Dementia: Evidence Triangulation from a Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Di Liu, Mei Ling Cao, Shan Shan Wu, Bing Li Li, Yi Wen Jiang, Teng Fei Lin, Fu Xiao Li, Wei Jie Cao, Jin Qiu Yuan, Feng Sha, Zhi Rong Yang, Jin Ling Tang","doi":"10.3967/bes2024.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Observational studies have found associations between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the risk of dementia, including Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and vascular dementia (VD); however, these findings are inconsistent. It remains unclear whether these associations are causal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis by systematically searching for observational studies on the association between IBD and dementia. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis based on summary genome-wide association studies (GWASs) was performed. Genetic correlation and Bayesian co-localization analyses were used to provide robust genetic evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten observational studies involving 80,565,688 participants were included in this meta-analysis. IBD was significantly associated with dementia (risk ratio [ <i>RR</i>] =1.36, 95% <i>CI</i> = 1.04-1.78; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 84.8%) and VD ( <i>RR</i> = 2.60, 95% <i>CI</i> = 1.18-5.70; only one study), but not with AD ( <i>RR</i> = 2.00, 95% <i>CI</i> = 0.96-4.13; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 99.8%). MR analyses did not supported significant causal associations of IBD with dementia (dementia: odds ratio [ <i>OR</i>] = 1.01, 95% <i>CI</i> = 0.98-1.03; AD: <i>OR</i> = 0.98, 95% <i>CI</i> = 0.95-1.01; VD: <i>OR</i> = 1.02, 95% <i>CI</i> = 0.97-1.07). In addition, genetic correlation and co-localization analyses did not reveal any genetic associations between IBD and dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study did not provide genetic evidence for a causal association between IBD and dementia risk. The increased risk of dementia observed in observational studies may be attributed to unobserved confounding factors or detection bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":93903,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","volume":"38 1","pages":"56-66"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2024.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Observational studies have found associations between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the risk of dementia, including Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and vascular dementia (VD); however, these findings are inconsistent. It remains unclear whether these associations are causal.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis by systematically searching for observational studies on the association between IBD and dementia. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis based on summary genome-wide association studies (GWASs) was performed. Genetic correlation and Bayesian co-localization analyses were used to provide robust genetic evidence.

Results: Ten observational studies involving 80,565,688 participants were included in this meta-analysis. IBD was significantly associated with dementia (risk ratio [ RR] =1.36, 95% CI = 1.04-1.78; I 2 = 84.8%) and VD ( RR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.18-5.70; only one study), but not with AD ( RR = 2.00, 95% CI = 0.96-4.13; I 2 = 99.8%). MR analyses did not supported significant causal associations of IBD with dementia (dementia: odds ratio [ OR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98-1.03; AD: OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.95-1.01; VD: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.97-1.07). In addition, genetic correlation and co-localization analyses did not reveal any genetic associations between IBD and dementia.

Conclusion: Our study did not provide genetic evidence for a causal association between IBD and dementia risk. The increased risk of dementia observed in observational studies may be attributed to unobserved confounding factors or detection bias.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炎症性肠病和痴呆:来自观察性研究和孟德尔随机化研究的荟萃分析的证据三角测量。
目的:观察性研究发现炎症性肠病(IBD)与痴呆风险之间存在关联,包括阿尔茨海默氏痴呆(AD)和血管性痴呆(VD);然而,这些发现是不一致的。目前尚不清楚这些联系是否有因果关系。方法:我们通过系统搜索IBD与痴呆之间关系的观察性研究进行了荟萃分析。基于汇总全基因组关联研究(GWASs)进行孟德尔随机化(MR)分析。遗传相关和贝叶斯共定位分析提供了可靠的遗传证据。结果:10项观察性研究共纳入80,565,688名受试者。IBD与痴呆显著相关(风险比[RR] =1.36, 95% CI = 1.04-1.78;I 2 = 84.8%)和VD (RR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.18-5.70;只有一项研究),但与AD无关(RR = 2.00, 95% CI = 0.96-4.13;i2 = 99.8%)。MR分析不支持IBD与痴呆有显著的因果关系(痴呆:比值比[OR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98-1.03;Ad: or = 0.98, 95% ci = 0.95-1.01;Vd: or = 1.02, 95% ci = 0.97-1.07)。此外,遗传相关性和共定位分析没有揭示IBD和痴呆之间的任何遗传关联。结论:我们的研究没有提供IBD和痴呆风险之间因果关系的遗传证据。观察性研究中观察到的痴呆风险增加可能归因于未观察到的混杂因素或检测偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plasma Metabolites Mediate the Associations of Gut Microbial Diversity with Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Its Variability. The Increasing Trends of Short and Long Sleep Duration among Chinese Adults from 2010 to 2018: A Repeated Nationally Representative Cross-sectional Survey. Relationship of Non-Essential and Essential Metals with Vitamin D in a Chinese Early Adolescent Cohort. Relationship between Coarse Cereals Consumption and Body Fat Percentage among Chinese School-aged Children. Dissecting the Causal Association between Body Fat Mass and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1