Centering equity through in-person data collection: short report.

Izza Zaidi, Leonardo Dominguez Gomez, Ashly E Jordan, Lauren Jessell, Alex Harocopos
{"title":"Centering equity through in-person data collection: short report.","authors":"Izza Zaidi, Leonardo Dominguez Gomez, Ashly E Jordan, Lauren Jessell, Alex Harocopos","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, data collection activities largely became tele-remote, excluding those who did not have the required technology or digital literacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June and September 2020, we collected data in-person from people who use opioids in New York City. Participants were recruited via street intercept and outside four syringe service programs in the city. Surveys were conducted outdoors, with researchers and participants wearing masks and maintaining physical distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 329 people participated in the survey. Participants reported an average age of 45.8 years, 69.6% identified as male, 32.6% identified as Hispanic/Latino/a and 22.3% identified as Black. Many experienced unstable housing/street homelessness (65.9%) and half did not have regular smartphone access (51.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many participants were struggling to meet their basic needs and did not have the resources to participate in tele-remote research or surveillance. In-person engagement may help researchers build trust, explain data security measures, and decrease technology and comprehension barriers. As data inform policies and programs, researchers must center equity by including under-engaged groups in data collection activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"375-379"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, data collection activities largely became tele-remote, excluding those who did not have the required technology or digital literacy.

Methods: Between June and September 2020, we collected data in-person from people who use opioids in New York City. Participants were recruited via street intercept and outside four syringe service programs in the city. Surveys were conducted outdoors, with researchers and participants wearing masks and maintaining physical distance.

Results: A total of 329 people participated in the survey. Participants reported an average age of 45.8 years, 69.6% identified as male, 32.6% identified as Hispanic/Latino/a and 22.3% identified as Black. Many experienced unstable housing/street homelessness (65.9%) and half did not have regular smartphone access (51.1%).

Conclusion: Many participants were struggling to meet their basic needs and did not have the resources to participate in tele-remote research or surveillance. In-person engagement may help researchers build trust, explain data security measures, and decrease technology and comprehension barriers. As data inform policies and programs, researchers must center equity by including under-engaged groups in data collection activities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过面对面的数据收集来聚焦股权:短报告。
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,数据收集活动基本上是远程的,不包括那些不具备所需技术或数字素养的人。方法:在2020年6月至9月期间,我们从纽约市使用阿片类药物的人群中亲自收集数据。参与者是通过街道拦截和在城市的四个注射器服务项目之外招募的。调查在户外进行,研究人员和参与者都戴着口罩,保持身体距离。结果:共有329人参与了调查。参与者的平均年龄为45.8岁,69.6%为男性,32.6%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔/黑人,22.3%为黑人。许多人的住房不稳定/无家可归(65.9%),一半的人没有固定的智能手机(51.1%)。结论:许多参与者正在努力满足他们的基本需求,并且没有资源参与远程研究或监测。亲自参与可以帮助研究人员建立信任,解释数据安全措施,减少技术和理解障碍。随着数据为政策和项目提供信息,研究人员必须以公平为中心,将参与不足的群体纳入数据收集活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From card to care: gaps in implementation of publicly funded health insurance among a vulnerable population in South India. A cross-sectional study on national cancer screening participation among people with physical disabilities: focus on health screening experience and perceptions. Workplace productivity losses due to multimorbidity: findings from an Australian longitudinal population survey, 2009-21. Perspectives on the importance of parents' health, health-promoting behaviour, and psychosocial and lifestyle factors during pregnancy on child health outcomes across the life course: a cross-sectional study among parents and professionals. Regional mortality disparities in Central and Eastern Europe 2000-22.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1