Pablo Fernández-León, Marta Lima-Serrano, José Manuel Martínez-Montilla
Background: Perceived usability is a key determinant of eHealth intervention uptake. This study evaluated the usability of Alerta Alcohol 2.0, an animation-based, computer-tailored game designed to prevent alcohol use and binge drinking among adolescents.
Methods: A cross-sectional mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a self-report questionnaire and cognitive debriefing using the think-aloud protocol.
Results: Thirty-five participants (mean age = 16.57 years; 71.4% female) completed the five-session program. Results showed that older adolescents were more likely to recommend the intervention and perceived its length as more appropriate. Adolescents engaging in binge drinking responded more positively to the design and videos, found the difficulty level more suitable, and required less assistance. Participants with a positive general evaluation of the program scored higher on most of the 21 usability items than those with a negative evaluation. Key areas for improvement, such as repetitive questions, technical glitches, and text readability, were identified and addressed.
Conclusions: This study highlights the value of a systematic feasibility process, rooted in evidence and informed by adolescents' perspectives, to enhance program usability. Findings provide initial support for the usability of Alerta Alcohol 2.0 and inform future development of computer-tailored interventions targeting adolescent health behaviors.
{"title":"Usability evaluation of Alerta Alcohol 2.0: an eHealth game to prevent adolescent alcohol consumption.","authors":"Pablo Fernández-León, Marta Lima-Serrano, José Manuel Martínez-Montilla","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdag022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdag022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perceived usability is a key determinant of eHealth intervention uptake. This study evaluated the usability of Alerta Alcohol 2.0, an animation-based, computer-tailored game designed to prevent alcohol use and binge drinking among adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a self-report questionnaire and cognitive debriefing using the think-aloud protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five participants (mean age = 16.57 years; 71.4% female) completed the five-session program. Results showed that older adolescents were more likely to recommend the intervention and perceived its length as more appropriate. Adolescents engaging in binge drinking responded more positively to the design and videos, found the difficulty level more suitable, and required less assistance. Participants with a positive general evaluation of the program scored higher on most of the 21 usability items than those with a negative evaluation. Key areas for improvement, such as repetitive questions, technical glitches, and text readability, were identified and addressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the value of a systematic feasibility process, rooted in evidence and informed by adolescents' perspectives, to enhance program usability. Findings provide initial support for the usability of Alerta Alcohol 2.0 and inform future development of computer-tailored interventions targeting adolescent health behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147505652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Publicly funded health insurance schemes aim to reduce financial barriers and improve access to care among underserved populations. This study explored the gaps and challenges in the implementation of Ayushman Bharat-Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY) among residents of an urban slum in Puducherry, South India.
Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 among adults randomly selected from 273 households in an urban coastal slum in Puducherry, a Union Territory of India. Data were collected through face-to-face interview using a semi-structured questionnaire with domains on socio-demographic characteristics, awareness, and utilization of PMJAY scheme. Date were entered in real time using the Epicollect5 mobile application and analysed using IBM SPSS version 21.
Results: Out of 273 interviewed participants, 161 (59%) were aware of the scheme and 177 (65%) were eligible to avail the scheme. Among the 177 eligible households, 49% had registered and 14% had utilized the benefits under the scheme. Difficult registration procedure and limited coverage of services under the scheme with respect to empanelled hospitals and treatment package were reported as challenges.
Conclusions: Despite moderate awareness, registration, and utilization of PMJAY among urban slum dwellers remain low. Addressing system-level barriers and expanding coverage are essential for improving uptake among vulnerable populations.
背景:公共资助的医疗保险计划旨在减少资金障碍,改善服务不足人群获得医疗服务的机会。本研究探讨了印度南部普杜切里市城市贫民窟居民实施“阿尤什曼巴拉特-普拉丹Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana”(PMJAY)计划的差距和挑战。方法:于2023年在印度联邦领土普杜切里的一个城市沿海贫民窟的273个家庭中随机抽取成年人进行了一项以社区为基础的横断面研究。通过面对面访谈收集数据,采用半结构化问卷,问卷内容涉及PMJAY计划的社会人口特征、意识和利用。使用Epicollect5移动应用程序实时输入数据,并使用IBM SPSS version 21进行分析。结果:在273名受访者中,161人(59%)知道该计划,177人(65%)有资格利用该计划。在177个符合资格的家庭中,49%已登记,14%已利用该计划下的福利。据报告,登记程序困难,在配备的医院和一揽子治疗方案方面,该计划下的服务覆盖面有限。结论:尽管城市贫民窟居民对PMJAY有一定的认识,但登记和使用PMJAY的人数仍然很低。解决系统层面的障碍和扩大覆盖范围对于改善弱势群体的吸收至关重要。
{"title":"From card to care: gaps in implementation of publicly funded health insurance among a vulnerable population in South India.","authors":"Govindassamy Swarna, Prabakaran Stalin","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdag021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdag021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Publicly funded health insurance schemes aim to reduce financial barriers and improve access to care among underserved populations. This study explored the gaps and challenges in the implementation of Ayushman Bharat-Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY) among residents of an urban slum in Puducherry, South India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 among adults randomly selected from 273 households in an urban coastal slum in Puducherry, a Union Territory of India. Data were collected through face-to-face interview using a semi-structured questionnaire with domains on socio-demographic characteristics, awareness, and utilization of PMJAY scheme. Date were entered in real time using the Epicollect5 mobile application and analysed using IBM SPSS version 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 273 interviewed participants, 161 (59%) were aware of the scheme and 177 (65%) were eligible to avail the scheme. Among the 177 eligible households, 49% had registered and 14% had utilized the benefits under the scheme. Difficult registration procedure and limited coverage of services under the scheme with respect to empanelled hospitals and treatment package were reported as challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite moderate awareness, registration, and utilization of PMJAY among urban slum dwellers remain low. Addressing system-level barriers and expanding coverage are essential for improving uptake among vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147390177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Since the end of New Labour's health inequality strategy, health inequalities in the UK have been widening. A recent critique suggested that New Labour policy actors were misdirected towards less effective solutions by the 'international consensus' understanding of health inequalities, which counterproductively medicalizes social inequality. This research explored whether social, economic and health policy actors at devolved levels shared this 'international consensus' policy frame of health inequality.
Methods: The Scottish Government and Greater Manchester Combined Authority were chosen as case study polities. Thirty-four policymakers were interviewed, and a frame analysis was conducted of thirty social, economic and health policy strategy texts, published between 2017 and 2022.
Results: The 'international consensus' policy frame was supported in these contexts by strong moral language, highlighting the social injustice of systematically distributed illness and death. However, political support was building behind health inequality framed in relation to 'illness-related economic inactivity' and 'healthcare for disadvantaged groups'. These two alternative frames using the same term directed policy solutions towards individual-level reactive healthcare, rather than population-level preventive public policy.
Conclusions: 'Health inequality' is understood in three competing ways in these policy settings. Alternative terms, such as 'social inequalities in health' and 'healthcare inequality', are preferable to minimize ambiguities.
{"title":"Reframing health inequality? The rise, rise and fall of three competing policy frames.","authors":"Ally Brown","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf141","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the end of New Labour's health inequality strategy, health inequalities in the UK have been widening. A recent critique suggested that New Labour policy actors were misdirected towards less effective solutions by the 'international consensus' understanding of health inequalities, which counterproductively medicalizes social inequality. This research explored whether social, economic and health policy actors at devolved levels shared this 'international consensus' policy frame of health inequality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Scottish Government and Greater Manchester Combined Authority were chosen as case study polities. Thirty-four policymakers were interviewed, and a frame analysis was conducted of thirty social, economic and health policy strategy texts, published between 2017 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 'international consensus' policy frame was supported in these contexts by strong moral language, highlighting the social injustice of systematically distributed illness and death. However, political support was building behind health inequality framed in relation to 'illness-related economic inactivity' and 'healthcare for disadvantaged groups'. These two alternative frames using the same term directed policy solutions towards individual-level reactive healthcare, rather than population-level preventive public policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>'Health inequality' is understood in three competing ways in these policy settings. Alternative terms, such as 'social inequalities in health' and 'healthcare inequality', are preferable to minimize ambiguities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145440213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Community nursery nurses (CNNs) play a vital role in UK health visiting teams, promoting child development and school readiness. The Infant to School (I2S) programme, delivered by CNNs under health visitor supervision, provides structured early intervention for families facing adversity.
Aim: To formatively evaluate the I2S programme from the perspective of CNNs, focusing on short-term outcomes, reported effects on children and families, and impacts on CNNs.
Methods: Seventeen of twenty CNNs (85%) completed an anonymised questionnaire. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative responses were analysed thematically.
Findings: Between September 2023 and February 2025, 212 families participated in the I2S programme, with language development as the main concern. CNNs reported that I2S enhanced their confidence, skills, and job satisfaction, enabling more structured, culturally sensitive, and relationship-based support. All respondents reported helping families to set and achieve short-term goals and connect with community services; 88% reported building strong relationships. Key themes included improved professional competence, greater ability to support families, and identified areas for further training and resource development.
Conclusion: This evaluation contributes new insight into the role of CNNs in supporting school readiness through a structured, health visiting-embedded programme. Continued evaluation, incorporating parental and child outcome data, is required to assess long-term impact and scalability.
{"title":"The Infant to School programme: supporting school readiness in children and developing community nursery nurses within health visiting teams.","authors":"Sharin Baldwin, Liza Azizpoor, Marzia Keshani, Wendy Sumpton, Marie McLouglin, Kathy Donohoe, Lynn Kemp","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf155","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community nursery nurses (CNNs) play a vital role in UK health visiting teams, promoting child development and school readiness. The Infant to School (I2S) programme, delivered by CNNs under health visitor supervision, provides structured early intervention for families facing adversity.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To formatively evaluate the I2S programme from the perspective of CNNs, focusing on short-term outcomes, reported effects on children and families, and impacts on CNNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen of twenty CNNs (85%) completed an anonymised questionnaire. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative responses were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between September 2023 and February 2025, 212 families participated in the I2S programme, with language development as the main concern. CNNs reported that I2S enhanced their confidence, skills, and job satisfaction, enabling more structured, culturally sensitive, and relationship-based support. All respondents reported helping families to set and achieve short-term goals and connect with community services; 88% reported building strong relationships. Key themes included improved professional competence, greater ability to support families, and identified areas for further training and resource development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evaluation contributes new insight into the role of CNNs in supporting school readiness through a structured, health visiting-embedded programme. Continued evaluation, incorporating parental and child outcome data, is required to assess long-term impact and scalability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"163-171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145696492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the dose-response relationship between leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and cardiovascular health, assessed by heart age and predicted 10-year CVD risk, and explore the mediating role of inflammatory regulation.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 6658 individuals aged 30-74 years from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2018. Heatmap visualization assessed variable distributions, while generalized linear regression models (GLMs) and restricted cubic splines quantitatively examined the LTPA-cardiovascular health associations.
Results: Heatmap visualization revealed that, among the 26 variables evaluated, LTPA was inversely associated with heart age, predicted 10-year CVD risk, and odds ratio for high CVD risk. GLM analyses indicated that each additional hour per week of LTPA was associated with a 0.17-year reduction in heart age, a 0.07% decrease in predicted 10-year CVD risk, and a 5% lower odds for having high CVD risk. Vigorous-intensity LTPA showed stronger benefits than moderate activity. Systemic inflammation biomarkers significantly mediated the associations between LTPA and cardiovascular health.
Conclusions: The findings support a dose-dependent cardioprotective effect of LTPA, partially mediated through anti-inflammatory pathways. These results highlight the importance of promoting LTPA, particularly vigorous-intensity activity, for cardiovascular health promotion.
{"title":"Dose-response associations between leisure-time physical activity, heart age and predicted 10-year cardiovascular disease risk.","authors":"Yijian Ding, Xi Xu, Bingxiang Xu, Ru Wang","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf154","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf154","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the dose-response relationship between leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and cardiovascular health, assessed by heart age and predicted 10-year CVD risk, and explore the mediating role of inflammatory regulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 6658 individuals aged 30-74 years from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2018. Heatmap visualization assessed variable distributions, while generalized linear regression models (GLMs) and restricted cubic splines quantitatively examined the LTPA-cardiovascular health associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heatmap visualization revealed that, among the 26 variables evaluated, LTPA was inversely associated with heart age, predicted 10-year CVD risk, and odds ratio for high CVD risk. GLM analyses indicated that each additional hour per week of LTPA was associated with a 0.17-year reduction in heart age, a 0.07% decrease in predicted 10-year CVD risk, and a 5% lower odds for having high CVD risk. Vigorous-intensity LTPA showed stronger benefits than moderate activity. Systemic inflammation biomarkers significantly mediated the associations between LTPA and cardiovascular health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings support a dose-dependent cardioprotective effect of LTPA, partially mediated through anti-inflammatory pathways. These results highlight the importance of promoting LTPA, particularly vigorous-intensity activity, for cardiovascular health promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"338-346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145710499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to: When love hurts: emotional labor and hidden strains of intimate partner violence in toxic relationships.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdag008","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pubmed/fdag008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146101204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sahaja Nagisetty, Suyesh Shrivastava, Ravindra Kumar
Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compile and analyze available evidence to estimate the pooled prevalence of undernutrition (underweight, stunting, and wasting) among tribal children in India.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was done using PubMed and Google Scholar and other web-based searches to find studies reporting the prevalence of undernutrition (underweight, stunting, and wasting) among tribal children of India. Out of 1606 identified studies, 58 met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance method, and the random effect model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence. The heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I2 statistic.
Results: The meta-analysis revealed that the overall pooled prevalence of underweight among tribal children was 43.78% (95% CI: 38.80%-48.83%). The pooled prevalence of stunting and wasting was 43.16% (95% CI: 39.10%-47.26%) and 29.58% (95% CI: 25.59%-33.73%). The significant heterogeneity observed across studies was likely due to variations in study design, geographic location, and measurement methods.
Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis highlight the alarmingly high burden of undernutrition among tribal children of India, with nearly half of the population being underweight and stunted and a substantial proportion suffering from wasting. These findings highlight the pressing need for tailored public health interventions that tackle the specific challenges encountered by tribal communities, including improving healthcare access, addressing poverty, and overcoming geographical barriers. Targeted interventions focusing on nutrition supplementation, health service accessibility, and socio-economic support are urgently recommended to reduce undernutrition in tribal children.
{"title":"Undernutrition status among tribal children of India-a systematic review & meta-analysis.","authors":"Sahaja Nagisetty, Suyesh Shrivastava, Ravindra Kumar","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf164","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf164","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compile and analyze available evidence to estimate the pooled prevalence of undernutrition (underweight, stunting, and wasting) among tribal children in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was done using PubMed and Google Scholar and other web-based searches to find studies reporting the prevalence of undernutrition (underweight, stunting, and wasting) among tribal children of India. Out of 1606 identified studies, 58 met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance method, and the random effect model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence. The heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I2 statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis revealed that the overall pooled prevalence of underweight among tribal children was 43.78% (95% CI: 38.80%-48.83%). The pooled prevalence of stunting and wasting was 43.16% (95% CI: 39.10%-47.26%) and 29.58% (95% CI: 25.59%-33.73%). The significant heterogeneity observed across studies was likely due to variations in study design, geographic location, and measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis highlight the alarmingly high burden of undernutrition among tribal children of India, with nearly half of the population being underweight and stunted and a substantial proportion suffering from wasting. These findings highlight the pressing need for tailored public health interventions that tackle the specific challenges encountered by tribal communities, including improving healthcare access, addressing poverty, and overcoming geographical barriers. Targeted interventions focusing on nutrition supplementation, health service accessibility, and socio-economic support are urgently recommended to reduce undernutrition in tribal children.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"291-307"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145936942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Go-Eun Lee, Ji-Sun Lee, Misun Jeon, Hyoeun Jang, Sanghee Kim
Background: A substantial disparity exists in cancer screening rates between individuals with and without physical disabilities, and there is a lack of information on the perceptions and experiences of cancer screening among individuals with disabilities and the factors influencing their participation.
Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, data were collected from 167 individuals with physical disabilities in Korea, using a questionnaire survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, chi-squared tests, Pearson's correlation, and multiple logistic regression analysis.
Results: The participation rate of individuals with physical disabilities in the national cancer screening program over the past 2 years was 55.1%. Perceived benefits of cancer screening were positive, whereas perceived barriers were lower than moderate. Self-efficacy regarding cancer screening was slightly above moderate. Individuals with prior health screening experience showed a significantly higher tendency to participate. Previous experience with health screening also led to differences in perceptions of cancer screening. Health screening experience and perceived benefits of cancer screening significantly influenced participation in national cancer screening.
Conclusions: To increase cancer screening participation among individuals with physical disabilities, it is crucial to not only reduce barriers to cancer screening but also enhance perceptions of its importance and benefits.
{"title":"A cross-sectional study on national cancer screening participation among people with physical disabilities: focus on health screening experience and perceptions.","authors":"Go-Eun Lee, Ji-Sun Lee, Misun Jeon, Hyoeun Jang, Sanghee Kim","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf124","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A substantial disparity exists in cancer screening rates between individuals with and without physical disabilities, and there is a lack of information on the perceptions and experiences of cancer screening among individuals with disabilities and the factors influencing their participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional descriptive study, data were collected from 167 individuals with physical disabilities in Korea, using a questionnaire survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, chi-squared tests, Pearson's correlation, and multiple logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participation rate of individuals with physical disabilities in the national cancer screening program over the past 2 years was 55.1%. Perceived benefits of cancer screening were positive, whereas perceived barriers were lower than moderate. Self-efficacy regarding cancer screening was slightly above moderate. Individuals with prior health screening experience showed a significantly higher tendency to participate. Previous experience with health screening also led to differences in perceptions of cancer screening. Health screening experience and perceived benefits of cancer screening significantly influenced participation in national cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To increase cancer screening participation among individuals with physical disabilities, it is crucial to not only reduce barriers to cancer screening but also enhance perceptions of its importance and benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"322-331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145277031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mohammad Afshar Ali, Syed Afroz Keramat, Christine Y Lu
Background: While productivity loss has been studied in various populations, the impact of multimorbidity on workplace productivity at a population level remains understudied. This study estimates the productivity losses attributable to multimorbidity.
Method: Using data from four waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we investigated the relationship between multimorbidity and productivity loss. Negative binomial and logistic regression models were employed to analyze absenteeism, presenteeism, and working hour tension as measures of productivity loss.
Results: We found a significant association between multimorbidity and increased absenteeism, presenteeism and working hour tension. After controlling for socio-economic, demographic, health, and workplace-related factors, individuals with multimorbidity had a 1.07-fold higher rate of absenteeism (incidence rate ratios: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02-1.13) compared to those without serious illness. Their odds of experiencing presenteeism were three times higher, and the incidence of working hour tension was 32% higher. On average, the annual cost of absenteeism was AU$265.20 higher for individuals with multimorbidity than for those without serious illness.
Conclusion: Our results underscore the need for evidence-based workplace policies to support the productivity and well-being of employees living with multimorbidity.
{"title":"Workplace productivity losses due to multimorbidity: findings from an Australian longitudinal population survey, 2009-21.","authors":"Mohammad Afshar Ali, Syed Afroz Keramat, Christine Y Lu","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf132","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While productivity loss has been studied in various populations, the impact of multimorbidity on workplace productivity at a population level remains understudied. This study estimates the productivity losses attributable to multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using data from four waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we investigated the relationship between multimorbidity and productivity loss. Negative binomial and logistic regression models were employed to analyze absenteeism, presenteeism, and working hour tension as measures of productivity loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a significant association between multimorbidity and increased absenteeism, presenteeism and working hour tension. After controlling for socio-economic, demographic, health, and workplace-related factors, individuals with multimorbidity had a 1.07-fold higher rate of absenteeism (incidence rate ratios: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02-1.13) compared to those without serious illness. Their odds of experiencing presenteeism were three times higher, and the incidence of working hour tension was 32% higher. On average, the annual cost of absenteeism was AU$265.20 higher for individuals with multimorbidity than for those without serious illness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results underscore the need for evidence-based workplace policies to support the productivity and well-being of employees living with multimorbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"4-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145277070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
En-Ling Wu, Makenna Meyer, Ellen Almirol, Xiaoquan Zhao, Gjvar Payne, Kavita Bhavan, Nickolas Zaller, Jerome Montgomery, Anna Hotton, Russell Brewer, Michelle M Johns, Matthew C Aalsma, Amelia S Knopf, Sarah Hodge, O'Dell Johnson, Chandler C Carter, Matthew Bucala, Aniruddha Hazra, Monal Shah, Mai T Pho, Alida Bouris, Suzan M Walters, Victoria Umutoni, Maria Pyra, Michelle Birkett, Gregory Phillips, Tamika C B Zapolski, Jeannette Webb, Jillian Smartt, Heather Horton, Mainza Durrell, Scott Fletcher, John A Schneider
Background: Community Network-Driven COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination of Vulnerable Populations in the Central United States (C3) evaluates the use of Social Network Strategy (SNS) with educational messaging to improve COVID-19 testing and vaccination among people most impacted by the pandemic.
Methods: We enrolled individuals with low-income who identify as Hispanic/Latino or a history of criminal legal involvement (CLI) through social network referral and randomized participants 1:1 to SNS vs. SNS plus messaging (SNS+), which included a self-affirmation activity and educational video. We assessed for COVID-19 testing and, among baseline unvaccinated participants, vaccination at 21 days, and used mixed effects logistic regression to examine outcomes.
Results: Of 1328 participants (SNS+: 667, SNS: 661), 46.6% identified as Black/African American, 33.4% as Hispanic/Latino, and 43.8% reported history of CLI. Majority (66.3%) reported testing and, of unvaccinated participants, 11.9% reported vaccination at follow-up. There were no differences in testing (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.71, 1.11, P = .49) or vaccination (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 0.78, 2.76, P = .30) among participants who received SNS+ compared to SNS after adjusting for recruitment wave and clustering within sites and referral chains.
Conclusions: Social network referral successfully engaged communities disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 in testing and vaccination. Compared to SNS alone, adding educational messaging did not increase testing or vaccination. Additional work is needed to implement SNS to increase vaccination rates among vulnerable populations.
背景:美国中部弱势人群社区网络驱动的COVID-19检测和疫苗接种(C3)评估了社交网络战略(SNS)与教育信息的使用情况,以改善受大流行影响最大的人群中的COVID-19检测和疫苗接种。方法:我们通过社交网络推荐招募了低收入的西班牙裔/拉丁裔或有刑事法律史(CLI)的个体,并将参与者1:1随机分配到SNS vs. SNS+消息传递(SNS+),其中包括自我肯定活动和教育视频。我们评估了COVID-19检测情况,并在基线未接种疫苗的参与者中评估了21天的疫苗接种情况,并使用混合效应logistic回归来检查结果。结果:1328名参与者(SNS+: 667, SNS: 661)中,46.6%为黑人/非裔美国人,33.4%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,43.8%报告有CLI病史。大多数(66.3%)报告进行了检测,未接种疫苗的参与者中,11.9%报告在随访时接种了疫苗。在调整了招募波和站点和转诊链内的聚类后,接受SNS+的参与者与接受SNS的参与者在检测(aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.71, 1.11, P = 0.49)或疫苗接种(aOR 1.46, 95% CI 0.78, 2.76, P = 0.30)方面没有差异。结论:社交网络转诊成功地吸引了受COVID-19影响严重的社区参与检测和疫苗接种。与单独的SNS相比,增加教育信息并没有增加检测或疫苗接种。需要开展更多的工作来实施SNS,以提高脆弱人群的疫苗接种率。
{"title":"A community network-driven COVID-19 testing and vaccination intervention for vulnerable populations in the Central United States: results from a Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics Underserved Populations randomized controlled trial.","authors":"En-Ling Wu, Makenna Meyer, Ellen Almirol, Xiaoquan Zhao, Gjvar Payne, Kavita Bhavan, Nickolas Zaller, Jerome Montgomery, Anna Hotton, Russell Brewer, Michelle M Johns, Matthew C Aalsma, Amelia S Knopf, Sarah Hodge, O'Dell Johnson, Chandler C Carter, Matthew Bucala, Aniruddha Hazra, Monal Shah, Mai T Pho, Alida Bouris, Suzan M Walters, Victoria Umutoni, Maria Pyra, Michelle Birkett, Gregory Phillips, Tamika C B Zapolski, Jeannette Webb, Jillian Smartt, Heather Horton, Mainza Durrell, Scott Fletcher, John A Schneider","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf134","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf134","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community Network-Driven COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination of Vulnerable Populations in the Central United States (C3) evaluates the use of Social Network Strategy (SNS) with educational messaging to improve COVID-19 testing and vaccination among people most impacted by the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled individuals with low-income who identify as Hispanic/Latino or a history of criminal legal involvement (CLI) through social network referral and randomized participants 1:1 to SNS vs. SNS plus messaging (SNS+), which included a self-affirmation activity and educational video. We assessed for COVID-19 testing and, among baseline unvaccinated participants, vaccination at 21 days, and used mixed effects logistic regression to examine outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1328 participants (SNS+: 667, SNS: 661), 46.6% identified as Black/African American, 33.4% as Hispanic/Latino, and 43.8% reported history of CLI. Majority (66.3%) reported testing and, of unvaccinated participants, 11.9% reported vaccination at follow-up. There were no differences in testing (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.71, 1.11, P = .49) or vaccination (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 0.78, 2.76, P = .30) among participants who received SNS+ compared to SNS after adjusting for recruitment wave and clustering within sites and referral chains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social network referral successfully engaged communities disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 in testing and vaccination. Compared to SNS alone, adding educational messaging did not increase testing or vaccination. Additional work is needed to implement SNS to increase vaccination rates among vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"122-136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145440281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}