Perception of Ayurveda Postgraduates to the Introduction of Formative Assessment.

IF 0.9 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_871_24
Vaishali Kuchewar, Shweta Parwe
{"title":"Perception of Ayurveda Postgraduates to the Introduction of Formative Assessment.","authors":"Vaishali Kuchewar, Shweta Parwe","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_871_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment is a key feature of teaching and the curriculum. It has a massive impact on the quality of learning. It is observed that at the postgraduate level, 80% of trainees are not observed, and the remaining were observed not more than once in their three years programme. Current assessment of postgraduate students is at the end of three years. It predominantly assesses the cognitive part and no scope to improve their clinical skills. In view of it, this study was planned to conduct formative assessment for postgraduate students with the help of Mini-CEX and DOPS and to seek their perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The postgraduate students of Department of Kayachikitsa and Panchakarma were invited voluntarily. Total 24 students (including first, second, and third year) were sensitized about the procedure of Mini-CEX and DOPS. The \"encounters\" were planned and schedule was displayed with names of student and teacher. The type of case was decided together by teacher and student. Each student was exposed to two Mini-CEX and two DOPS). Specific systemic examination and procedures were selected for Mini-CEX and DOPS, respectively. The time allocated for Mini-CEX and DOPS was as per the type of procedure but usually 15 minutes was allotted to each encounter for observation.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Overall students' feedback about formative assessment was positive helping them to identify the gaps in their knowledge, and motivating them to learn.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mini-CEX and DOPS were well accepted by students as well as faculties as a formative assessment tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 4","pages":"S3812-S3814"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_871_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessment is a key feature of teaching and the curriculum. It has a massive impact on the quality of learning. It is observed that at the postgraduate level, 80% of trainees are not observed, and the remaining were observed not more than once in their three years programme. Current assessment of postgraduate students is at the end of three years. It predominantly assesses the cognitive part and no scope to improve their clinical skills. In view of it, this study was planned to conduct formative assessment for postgraduate students with the help of Mini-CEX and DOPS and to seek their perception.

Methods: The postgraduate students of Department of Kayachikitsa and Panchakarma were invited voluntarily. Total 24 students (including first, second, and third year) were sensitized about the procedure of Mini-CEX and DOPS. The "encounters" were planned and schedule was displayed with names of student and teacher. The type of case was decided together by teacher and student. Each student was exposed to two Mini-CEX and two DOPS). Specific systemic examination and procedures were selected for Mini-CEX and DOPS, respectively. The time allocated for Mini-CEX and DOPS was as per the type of procedure but usually 15 minutes was allotted to each encounter for observation.

Result: Overall students' feedback about formative assessment was positive helping them to identify the gaps in their knowledge, and motivating them to learn.

Conclusion: Mini-CEX and DOPS were well accepted by students as well as faculties as a formative assessment tool.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿育吠陀研究生对引入形成性评价的看法。
背景:评价是教学和课程的一个重要特征。它对学习质量有巨大的影响。据观察,在研究生阶段,80%的受训者没有被观察,其余的人在他们的三年计划中被观察不超过一次。目前对研究生的考核是在三年后进行的。它主要评估认知部分,没有提高他们临床技能的余地。鉴于此,本研究拟借助Mini-CEX和DOPS对研究生进行形成性评估,并寻求他们的认知。方法:自愿邀请日本医学部的研究生参加研究。共有24名学生(包括一年级、二年级和三年级)对Mini-CEX和DOPS的程序敏感。“会面”是有计划的,日程表上显示着学生和老师的名字。案件类型由老师和学生共同决定。每个学生都接触了两个Mini-CEX和两个DOPS)。Mini-CEX和DOPS分别选择了具体的系统检查和程序。分配给小型行政会议和执行事务厅的时间按程序类型而定,但通常为每次接触分配15分钟进行观察。结果:总体而言,学生对形成性评估的反馈是积极的,有助于他们发现自己的知识差距,并激励他们学习。结论:Mini-CEX和DOPS作为一种形成性评价工具,深受学生和教师的欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Salivary Osteocalcin Level Among Smokers and Non-Smokers Undergoing Dental Implants: An Observational Study. Influence of Reciprocating vs Rotary Kinematics on Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment: A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Association of Sleep Disorders with Temporomandibular Joint Pain Dysfunction Syndrome. Clinical Evaluation of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo in Patients after Mild to Moderate Head Trauma. Knowledge, Perceptions and Attitude Towards Effect of Screen Time among Undergraduate Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1