A phase IIb randomised-controlled trial of the FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist icosabutate in MASH

IF 33 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2025.01.032
Stephen A. Harrison , Naim Alkhouri , Grisell Ortiz-Lasanta , Madhavi Rudraraju , Dean Tai , Katy Wack , Amrik Shah , Robin Besuyen , Hilde H. Steineger , David.A. Fraser , Arun J. Sanyal , the ICONA Study Investigators
{"title":"A phase IIb randomised-controlled trial of the FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist icosabutate in MASH","authors":"Stephen A. Harrison ,&nbsp;Naim Alkhouri ,&nbsp;Grisell Ortiz-Lasanta ,&nbsp;Madhavi Rudraraju ,&nbsp;Dean Tai ,&nbsp;Katy Wack ,&nbsp;Amrik Shah ,&nbsp;Robin Besuyen ,&nbsp;Hilde H. Steineger ,&nbsp;David.A. Fraser ,&nbsp;Arun J. Sanyal ,&nbsp;the ICONA Study Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.jhep.2025.01.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><div>Via regulation of glycaemic control and inflammation, free fatty receptor (FFAR)1 and 4 are potential targets for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). In this study, we tested the efficacy and safety of icosabutate, a FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist, in patients with MASH.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a phase IIb, multicentre, 52-week, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (ICONA) testing the efficacy of icosabutate in patients with MASH and F1–F3 (mild to severe) fibrosis. Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive once-daily, oral icosabutate 300 mg, 600 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with MASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis in the 600 mg arm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The primary population for efficacy analysis comprised 187 patients (placebo [n = 62], 300 mg icosabutate [n = 58] or 600 mg icosabutate [n = 67]). The percentage of patients with MASH resolution favoured the icosabutate 600 mg arm without reaching statistical significance (23.9% <em>vs.</em> 14.5%; odds ratio 2.01; 95% CI 0.8–5.08; <em>p</em> = 0.13). A higher percentage of patients treated with icosabutate achieved a ≥1-stage improvement in fibrosis, with a response rate of 29.3% in the 300 mg arm (odds ratio 2.89; 95% CI 1.09–7.70) and 23.9% in the 600 mg arm (odds ratio 2.4; 95% CI 0.90–6.37) <em>vs.</em> 11.3% in the placebo arm. An improvement in fibrosis was observed using AI-assisted digital pathology. Marked decreases in biomarkers of liver damage were observed. Icosabutate was generally safe and well tolerated, with mild to moderate treatment-emergent adverse events and no reports of drug-induced liver injury.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although the primary endpoint was not met, treatment with icosabutate was associated with encouraging fibrosis (as measured by both conventional and AI-assisted digital pathology) and non-invasive biomarker data, supporting further development in patients with MASH.</div></div><div><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier</h3><div>NCT04052516.</div></div><div><h3>Impact and implications</h3><div>With expression on multiple cell types regulating both glycaemic control and liver inflammation, targeting free fatty acid receptors (FFAR)1 and 4 could offer an attractive approach for the treatment of both fibrosing metabolic dysfunction-assoicated steatohepatitis (MASH) and its comorbidities. Although treatment of patients with MASH and F1–F3 fibrosis with oral icosabutate (a FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist) did not meet the pre-defined primary endpoint (MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis), the overall dataset (including AI-assisted digital pathology) suggest an improvement in fibrosis in treated patients. Improvements in multiple biomarkers of liver damage, inflammation and glycaemic control were observed in response to therapy. Icosabutate was generally safe and well tolerated, and the overall data support further testing of icosabutate in patients with MASH, in particular those with more advanced disease (F2–F3 fibrosis) and type 2 diabetes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatology","volume":"83 2","pages":"Pages 293-303"},"PeriodicalIF":33.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168827825000698","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

Via regulation of glycaemic control and inflammation, free fatty receptor (FFAR)1 and 4 are potential targets for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). In this study, we tested the efficacy and safety of icosabutate, a FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist, in patients with MASH.

Methods

We performed a phase IIb, multicentre, 52-week, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (ICONA) testing the efficacy of icosabutate in patients with MASH and F1–F3 (mild to severe) fibrosis. Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive once-daily, oral icosabutate 300 mg, 600 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with MASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis in the 600 mg arm.

Results

The primary population for efficacy analysis comprised 187 patients (placebo [n = 62], 300 mg icosabutate [n = 58] or 600 mg icosabutate [n = 67]). The percentage of patients with MASH resolution favoured the icosabutate 600 mg arm without reaching statistical significance (23.9% vs. 14.5%; odds ratio 2.01; 95% CI 0.8–5.08; p = 0.13). A higher percentage of patients treated with icosabutate achieved a ≥1-stage improvement in fibrosis, with a response rate of 29.3% in the 300 mg arm (odds ratio 2.89; 95% CI 1.09–7.70) and 23.9% in the 600 mg arm (odds ratio 2.4; 95% CI 0.90–6.37) vs. 11.3% in the placebo arm. An improvement in fibrosis was observed using AI-assisted digital pathology. Marked decreases in biomarkers of liver damage were observed. Icosabutate was generally safe and well tolerated, with mild to moderate treatment-emergent adverse events and no reports of drug-induced liver injury.

Conclusion

Although the primary endpoint was not met, treatment with icosabutate was associated with encouraging fibrosis (as measured by both conventional and AI-assisted digital pathology) and non-invasive biomarker data, supporting further development in patients with MASH.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT04052516.

Impact and implications

With expression on multiple cell types regulating both glycaemic control and liver inflammation, targeting free fatty acid receptors (FFAR)1 and 4 could offer an attractive approach for the treatment of both fibrosing metabolic dysfunction-assoicated steatohepatitis (MASH) and its comorbidities. Although treatment of patients with MASH and F1–F3 fibrosis with oral icosabutate (a FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist) did not meet the pre-defined primary endpoint (MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis), the overall dataset (including AI-assisted digital pathology) suggest an improvement in fibrosis in treated patients. Improvements in multiple biomarkers of liver damage, inflammation and glycaemic control were observed in response to therapy. Icosabutate was generally safe and well tolerated, and the overall data support further testing of icosabutate in patients with MASH, in particular those with more advanced disease (F2–F3 fibrosis) and type 2 diabetes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FFAR1/FFAR4激动剂icosabutate在MASH中的IIb期随机对照试验
游离脂肪受体(FFAR)1和4通过调节血糖控制和炎症,是治疗MASH的潜在靶点。这项研究测试了icosabutate(一种FFAR1/FFAR4激动剂)在MASH患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:我们进行了一项2b期、多中心、52周、随机、安慰剂对照试验(ICONA),测试伊沙酸酯对伴有F1-F3(轻度至重度)纤维化的MASH患者的疗效。患者以1:1:1的比例随机分配,接受每日一次、口服伊可萨酸酯300毫克、600毫克或安慰剂,持续52周。主要疗效终点是在600 mg组中,MASH消退且纤维化无恶化的患者比例。结果疗效分析的主要人群包括187例患者[安慰剂(n=62), 300 mg伊柯酸酯(n= 58)或600 mg伊柯酸酯(n=67)]。有MASH解决方案的患者百分比倾向于使用icosabutate 600 mg组,但没有达到统计学意义(23.9% vs. 14.5%;优势比,2.01;95%置信区间[CI], 0.8 ~ 5.08;P = 0.13)。使用伊柯酸酯治疗的患者达到≥1期纤维化改善的比例较高,300 mg组的缓解率为29.3%(优势比,2.89;95% CI, 1.09 - 7.70)), 600 mg组为23.9%(优势比2.4;95% CI, 0.90 - 6.37),安慰剂组为11.3%。使用人工智能辅助数字病理学观察到纤维化的改善。观察到肝损伤的生物标志物明显下降。Icosabutate通常是安全的,耐受性良好,有轻度至中度teae,没有药物性肝损伤的报道。结论:虽然主要终点未达到,但伊沙戊酸治疗显示出促进纤维化(通过传统和人工智能辅助的数字病理学测量)和非侵入性生物标志物数据,支持在MASH患者中的进一步开发。靶向游离脂肪酸受体1和4可能为纤维化MASH及其合并症的治疗提供一种有吸引力的方法。•尽管口服伊沙戊酸酯(一种FFAR1/FFAR4激动剂)治疗F1-F3型MASH患者没有达到预定的主要终点(MASH消退而纤维化恶化),但总体数据集(包括人工智能辅助的数字病理学)表明治疗患者的纤维化有所改善。•在治疗反应中观察到肝损伤、炎症和血糖控制的多种生物标志物的改善。•Icosabutate总体上是安全且耐受性良好的,总体数据支持Icosabutate在MASH患者中的进一步测试,特别是那些疾病晚期(F2-F3纤维化)和2型糖尿病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepatology
Journal of Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
46.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
2325
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepatology is the official publication of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It is dedicated to presenting clinical and basic research in the field of hepatology through original papers, reviews, case reports, and letters to the Editor. The Journal is published in English and may consider supplements that pass an editorial review.
期刊最新文献
Refining the Baveno VII criteria for clinically significant portal hypertension: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Enhancing intestinal goblet cell-associated antigen passages could attenuate ALD. Asynchronous Transitions from High-Risk Hepatoblastoma to Carcinoma Efficacy of liver transplantation after response to atezolizumab-bevacizumab downstaging of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (ImmunoXXL). Responses to “Letters to the Editors” by Luo et al. and Chen et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1