A phase IIb randomised-controlled trial of the FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist icosabutate in MASH

IF 26.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2025.01.032
Stephen A. Harrison, Naim Alkhouri, Grisell Ortiz-Lasanta, Madhavi Rudraraju, Dean Tai, Katy Wack, Amrik Shah, Robin Besuyen, Hilde H. Steineger, David.A. Fraser, Arun J. Sanyal
{"title":"A phase IIb randomised-controlled trial of the FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist icosabutate in MASH","authors":"Stephen A. Harrison, Naim Alkhouri, Grisell Ortiz-Lasanta, Madhavi Rudraraju, Dean Tai, Katy Wack, Amrik Shah, Robin Besuyen, Hilde H. Steineger, David.A. Fraser, Arun J. Sanyal","doi":"10.1016/j.jhep.2025.01.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Via regulation of glycemic control and inflammation, free fatty receptor (FFAR)1 and 4 are potential targets for the treatment of MASH. This study tested the efficacy and safety of icosabutate, a FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist, in MASH patients.<h3>Methods</h3>We performed a phase 2b, multicenter, 52-week, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (ICONA) testing the efficacy of icosabutate in MASH patients with F1-F3 (mild to severe) fibrosis. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily, oral icosabutate 300 mg, 600 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with MASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis in the 600 mg arm.<h3>Results</h3>The primary population for efficacy analysis comprised 187 patients [placebo (n=62), 300 mg icosabutate (n= 58) or 600 mg icosabutate (n=67)]. The percentage of patients with MASH resolution favoured the icosabutate 600 mg arm without reaching statistical significance (23.9% vs. 14.5%; odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 5.08; P=0.13). A higher percentage of patients treated with icosabutate achieved a ≥1-stage improvement in fibrosis, with a response rate of 29.3% in the 300 mg arm (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.09 to 7.70))and 23.9% in the 600 mg arm (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.90 to 6.37)) vs. 11.3% in the placebo arm. An improvement in fibrosis was observed using AI-assisted digital pathology. Marked decreases in biomarkers of liver damage were observed. Icosabutate was generally safe and well tolerated, with mild to moderate TEAEs and no reports of drug induced liver injury.<h3>Conclusion</h3>Although the primary endpoint was not met, treatment with icosabutate demonstrated encouraging fibrosis (as measured by both conventional and AI-assisted digital pathology) and non-invasive biomarker data, supporting further development in MASH patients.<h3>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier</h3>NCT04052516<h3>Impact and Implications</h3>• With expression on multiple cells types regulating both glycemic control and liver inflammation, targeting free fatty acid receptors 1 and 4 could offer an attractive approach for the treatment of both fibrosing MASH and it’s comorbidities.• Although treatment of F1-F3 MASH patients with oral icosabutate (a FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist) did not meet the pre-defined primary endpoint (MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis), the overall dataset (including AI-assisted digital pathology) suggest an improvement in fibrosis in treated patients.• Improvements in multiple biomarkers of liver damage, inflammation and glycemic control were observed in response to therapy.• Icosabutate was generally safe and well-tolerated, and the overall data support further testing of icosabutate in MASH patients, in particular those with more advanced disease (F2-F3 fibrosis) and type 2 diabetes<strong>.</strong>","PeriodicalId":15888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":26.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2025.01.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Via regulation of glycemic control and inflammation, free fatty receptor (FFAR)1 and 4 are potential targets for the treatment of MASH. This study tested the efficacy and safety of icosabutate, a FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist, in MASH patients.

Methods

We performed a phase 2b, multicenter, 52-week, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (ICONA) testing the efficacy of icosabutate in MASH patients with F1-F3 (mild to severe) fibrosis. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive once-daily, oral icosabutate 300 mg, 600 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with MASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis in the 600 mg arm.

Results

The primary population for efficacy analysis comprised 187 patients [placebo (n=62), 300 mg icosabutate (n= 58) or 600 mg icosabutate (n=67)]. The percentage of patients with MASH resolution favoured the icosabutate 600 mg arm without reaching statistical significance (23.9% vs. 14.5%; odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 5.08; P=0.13). A higher percentage of patients treated with icosabutate achieved a ≥1-stage improvement in fibrosis, with a response rate of 29.3% in the 300 mg arm (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.09 to 7.70))and 23.9% in the 600 mg arm (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.90 to 6.37)) vs. 11.3% in the placebo arm. An improvement in fibrosis was observed using AI-assisted digital pathology. Marked decreases in biomarkers of liver damage were observed. Icosabutate was generally safe and well tolerated, with mild to moderate TEAEs and no reports of drug induced liver injury.

Conclusion

Although the primary endpoint was not met, treatment with icosabutate demonstrated encouraging fibrosis (as measured by both conventional and AI-assisted digital pathology) and non-invasive biomarker data, supporting further development in MASH patients.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT04052516

Impact and Implications

• With expression on multiple cells types regulating both glycemic control and liver inflammation, targeting free fatty acid receptors 1 and 4 could offer an attractive approach for the treatment of both fibrosing MASH and it’s comorbidities.• Although treatment of F1-F3 MASH patients with oral icosabutate (a FFAR1/FFAR4 agonist) did not meet the pre-defined primary endpoint (MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis), the overall dataset (including AI-assisted digital pathology) suggest an improvement in fibrosis in treated patients.• Improvements in multiple biomarkers of liver damage, inflammation and glycemic control were observed in response to therapy.• Icosabutate was generally safe and well-tolerated, and the overall data support further testing of icosabutate in MASH patients, in particular those with more advanced disease (F2-F3 fibrosis) and type 2 diabetes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepatology
Journal of Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
46.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
2325
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepatology is the official publication of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It is dedicated to presenting clinical and basic research in the field of hepatology through original papers, reviews, case reports, and letters to the Editor. The Journal is published in English and may consider supplements that pass an editorial review.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents The EASL Guidelines app is your indispensable mobile companion for accessing comprehensive and up-to-date clinical practice guidelines in hepatology. Download it now! The THRIVE project aims to understand tumor-host interactions in adult and childhood liver cancer to develop response biomarkers and new therapies Join the community and become an EASL member today!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1