Preferences of future cooking fuel types among urban and peri-urban households in Greater Accra Region of Ghana: Business-as-usual or sustainable pathways?

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114525
Simon Bawakyillenuo, Innocent S.K. Agbelie, Aba O. Crentsil, Stephanie K. Danquah
{"title":"Preferences of future cooking fuel types among urban and peri-urban households in Greater Accra Region of Ghana: Business-as-usual or sustainable pathways?","authors":"Simon Bawakyillenuo,&nbsp;Innocent S.K. Agbelie,&nbsp;Aba O. Crentsil,&nbsp;Stephanie K. Danquah","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Women and children in Ghana face risks such as burns, poisoning, and injuries from using solid biomass fuels like charcoal and firewood for cooking. Although LPG is the dominant modern cooking fuel, electricity remains less commonly used. In the Greater Accra Region, 70% of households rely on LPG for cooking, while 23% and 3% use charcoal and firewood, respectively. This study examines the future cooking fuel preferences of households in Ga East, Ga West, and Adenta Municipalities, using data from 1200 urban and peri-urban households collected through a mixed-method approach. Findings reveal that LPG is expected to remain the preferred cooking fuel over the next five years, followed by charcoal, with electricity ranked third. These future preferences reflect current practices, indicating a continuation of existing trends. However, 7.3% of households expressed interest in adopting e-cooking technologies, such as Electric Pressure Cookers (EPC), if these technologies become more accessible and affordable. This suggests a potential shift toward sustainable cooking practices. To promote the adoption of e-cooking technologies, critical policy measures focused on education, affordability, and technology availability are necessary. Such initiatives could support a transition to environmentally sustainable cooking solutions in the Greater Accra Region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 114525"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women and children in Ghana face risks such as burns, poisoning, and injuries from using solid biomass fuels like charcoal and firewood for cooking. Although LPG is the dominant modern cooking fuel, electricity remains less commonly used. In the Greater Accra Region, 70% of households rely on LPG for cooking, while 23% and 3% use charcoal and firewood, respectively. This study examines the future cooking fuel preferences of households in Ga East, Ga West, and Adenta Municipalities, using data from 1200 urban and peri-urban households collected through a mixed-method approach. Findings reveal that LPG is expected to remain the preferred cooking fuel over the next five years, followed by charcoal, with electricity ranked third. These future preferences reflect current practices, indicating a continuation of existing trends. However, 7.3% of households expressed interest in adopting e-cooking technologies, such as Electric Pressure Cookers (EPC), if these technologies become more accessible and affordable. This suggests a potential shift toward sustainable cooking practices. To promote the adoption of e-cooking technologies, critical policy measures focused on education, affordability, and technology availability are necessary. Such initiatives could support a transition to environmentally sustainable cooking solutions in the Greater Accra Region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳大阿克拉地区城市和城郊家庭对未来烹饪燃料类型的偏好:一切照旧还是可持续发展?
加纳的妇女和儿童因使用木炭和木柴等固体生物质燃料做饭而面临烧伤、中毒和受伤等风险。虽然液化石油气是主要的现代烹饪燃料,但电仍然不太常用。在大阿克拉地区,70%的家庭依靠液化石油气做饭,23%和3%的家庭分别使用木炭和柴火。本研究使用通过混合方法收集的1200个城市和城郊家庭的数据,调查了Ga East、Ga West和Adenta市政当局家庭未来烹饪燃料的偏好。调查结果显示,在未来五年内,液化石油气预计仍将是首选的烹饪燃料,其次是木炭,电力排名第三。这些未来的偏好反映了当前的做法,表明现有趋势的延续。然而,7.3%的家庭表示有兴趣采用电子烹饪技术,如电压力锅(EPC),如果这些技术变得更容易获得和负担得起的话。这表明一种向可持续烹饪方式的潜在转变。为了促进电子烹饪技术的采用,有必要采取重点放在教育、可负担性和技术可用性方面的关键政策措施。这些举措可以支持大阿克拉地区向环境可持续的烹饪解决方案过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Can Europe’s decarbonisation goals offset the merit-order effect and support renewable energy value factors? The right kind of energy: Understanding conservative support for clean energy in South Korea Energy storage adoption: Evidence from self-generation incentive program in California Electric vehicle adoption and utilization of renewable energy in U.S.: Sensitivity analysis of electricity tariffs and emission pricing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1