Dificultades percibidas en atención primaria en el abordaje de los cuidados paliativos

IF 0.9 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.semerg.2025.102457
P. Dopico , C. Cervera , P. Ramallal , A. Balayo , P. Gil , L. Arce , L. Arias-Fernández
{"title":"Dificultades percibidas en atención primaria en el abordaje de los cuidados paliativos","authors":"P. Dopico ,&nbsp;C. Cervera ,&nbsp;P. Ramallal ,&nbsp;A. Balayo ,&nbsp;P. Gil ,&nbsp;L. Arce ,&nbsp;L. Arias-Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2025.102457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Describe the difficulties perceived by Primary Care health professionals in approaching Palliative Care and their association with sociodemographic and work characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional study was conducted over a sample of 224 primary care workers (doctors and nurses). Perceived difficulties were assessed by means of Palliative Care Difficulties Scale (PCDS), a validated scale that includes five items: team communication, patient and family communication, Palliative Care team support, relief of symptoms and coordination with the community. Sociodemographic and employment characteristics were collected with self-administered questionnaires. To explore the differences in PCDS scale scores according to socio-occupational characteristics, Student's T-test was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Perceived difficulty was moderate (mean score [standard deviation]: 41.7 [8.61]). Specifically, communication with the team, symptom relief and coordination between care levels reported greater perceived difficulty (8.10 [2.46]; 9.90 [2.67] and 10.1 [2.71], respectively). Being over 40<!--> <!-->years old, a nursing degree, work experience &lt;<!--> <!-->15<!--> <!-->years and poor perception of the approach and knowledge of Palliative Care were associated with greater perceived difficulty (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05). 79% of the participants expressed a need for training in Palliative Care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Primary Care professionals have moderate difficulty in approaching Palliative Care, especially in communication between the team, symptom relief, and coordination in the community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53212,"journal":{"name":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 102457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359325000103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Describe the difficulties perceived by Primary Care health professionals in approaching Palliative Care and their association with sociodemographic and work characteristics.

Materials and methods

Cross-sectional study was conducted over a sample of 224 primary care workers (doctors and nurses). Perceived difficulties were assessed by means of Palliative Care Difficulties Scale (PCDS), a validated scale that includes five items: team communication, patient and family communication, Palliative Care team support, relief of symptoms and coordination with the community. Sociodemographic and employment characteristics were collected with self-administered questionnaires. To explore the differences in PCDS scale scores according to socio-occupational characteristics, Student's T-test was performed.

Results

Perceived difficulty was moderate (mean score [standard deviation]: 41.7 [8.61]). Specifically, communication with the team, symptom relief and coordination between care levels reported greater perceived difficulty (8.10 [2.46]; 9.90 [2.67] and 10.1 [2.71], respectively). Being over 40 years old, a nursing degree, work experience < 15 years and poor perception of the approach and knowledge of Palliative Care were associated with greater perceived difficulty (P < .05). 79% of the participants expressed a need for training in Palliative Care.

Conclusions

Primary Care professionals have moderate difficulty in approaching Palliative Care, especially in communication between the team, symptom relief, and coordination in the community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健在姑息治疗方面的困难
目的描述初级保健卫生专业人员在接受姑息治疗时感受到的困难及其与社会人口统计学和工作特点的关系。材料与方法对224名初级保健工作者(医生和护士)进行横断面研究。感知困难采用姑息治疗困难量表(PCDS)进行评估,该量表包括5个项目:团队沟通、患者和家属沟通、姑息治疗团队支持、症状缓解和与社区协调。采用自填问卷收集社会人口学特征和就业特征。为了探讨社会职业特征在PCDS量表得分上的差异,我们进行了学生t检验。结果感知困难程度中等(平均得分[标准差]:41.7[8.61])。具体而言,与团队的沟通、症状缓解和护理水平之间的协调报告了更大的感知困难(8.10 [2.46];9.90[2.67]和10.1[2.71])。40岁以上,护理专业学历,有工作经验;15年和对姑息治疗方法和知识的认知不足与更大的感知困难相关(P <;. 05)。79%的参与者表示需要接受姑息治疗方面的培训。结论初级保健专业人员在接受姑息治疗方面存在中度困难,尤其是在团队沟通、症状缓解和社区协调方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN
Medicina de Familia-SEMERGEN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
39 days
期刊最新文献
Más allá de la trombosis habitual: síndrome de May-Thurner Síndrome compartimental agudo de la mano en el paciente pediátrico: diagnóstico clínico y tratamiento urgente Lesión por inyección de pintura a presión en un dedo: importancia del reconocimiento y tratamiento tempranos ¿Qué hay debajo? Ecografía de partes blandas en Urgencias Estriatopatía diabética: una causa reversible de trastorno del movimiento agudo en el paciente pluripatológico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1