Monetary–fiscal interaction and the liquidity of government debt

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Economic Review Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.104979
Cristiano Cantore , Edoardo Leonardi
{"title":"Monetary–fiscal interaction and the liquidity of government debt","authors":"Cristiano Cantore ,&nbsp;Edoardo Leonardi","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.104979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How does the monetary and fiscal policy mix alter households’ saving incentives? To answer these questions, we build a heterogeneous agents New Keynesian model where three different types of agents can save in assets with different liquidity profiles to insure against idiosyncratic risk. Policy mixes affect saving incentives differently according to their effect on the liquidity premium- the return difference between less liquid assets and public debt. We derive an intuitive analytical expression linking the liquidity premium with consumption differentials amongst different types of agents. This underscores the presence of a transmission mechanism through which the interaction of monetary and fiscal policy shapes economic stability via its effect on the portfolio choice of private agents. We call it the <em>self-insurance demand channel</em>, which moves the liquidity premium in the opposite direction to the standard <em>policy-driven supply channel</em>. Our analysis thus reveals the presence of two competing forces driving the liquidity premium. We show that the relative strength of the two is tightly linked to the policy mix in place and the type of business cycle shock hitting the economy. This implies that to stabilize the economy, monetary policy should consider the impact of the <em>self-insurance</em> on the liquidity premium.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48389,"journal":{"name":"European Economic Review","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 104979"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292125000297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How does the monetary and fiscal policy mix alter households’ saving incentives? To answer these questions, we build a heterogeneous agents New Keynesian model where three different types of agents can save in assets with different liquidity profiles to insure against idiosyncratic risk. Policy mixes affect saving incentives differently according to their effect on the liquidity premium- the return difference between less liquid assets and public debt. We derive an intuitive analytical expression linking the liquidity premium with consumption differentials amongst different types of agents. This underscores the presence of a transmission mechanism through which the interaction of monetary and fiscal policy shapes economic stability via its effect on the portfolio choice of private agents. We call it the self-insurance demand channel, which moves the liquidity premium in the opposite direction to the standard policy-driven supply channel. Our analysis thus reveals the presence of two competing forces driving the liquidity premium. We show that the relative strength of the two is tightly linked to the policy mix in place and the type of business cycle shock hitting the economy. This implies that to stabilize the economy, monetary policy should consider the impact of the self-insurance on the liquidity premium.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
货币-财政互动与政府债务的流动性
货币和财政政策组合如何改变家庭的储蓄动机?为了回答这些问题,我们建立了一个异质代理人新凯恩斯模型,其中三种不同类型的代理人可以储蓄具有不同流动性特征的资产以防范特殊风险。根据对流动性溢价(流动性较差的资产与公共债务之间的回报差)的影响,政策组合对储蓄激励的影响不同。我们推导了一个直观的分析表达式,将流动性溢价与不同类型代理之间的消费差异联系起来。这强调了一种传导机制的存在,货币和财政政策的相互作用通过其对私人代理人的投资组合选择的影响来塑造经济稳定。我们称之为自我保险需求通道,它使流动性溢价与标准的政策驱动的供给通道方向相反。因此,我们的分析揭示了驱动流动性溢价的两种竞争力量的存在。我们表明,两者的相对强度与现有的政策组合和打击经济的商业周期冲击的类型密切相关。这意味着,为了稳定经济,货币政策应该考虑自我保险对流动性溢价的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: The European Economic Review (EER) started publishing in 1969 as the first research journal specifically aiming to contribute to the development and application of economics as a science in Europe. As a broad-based professional and international journal, the EER welcomes submissions of applied and theoretical research papers in all fields of economics. The aim of the EER is to contribute to the development of the science of economics and its applications, as well as to improve communication between academic researchers, teachers and policy makers across the European continent and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Quasi-fiscal policies in times of crisis: A high-frequency data analysis The kindness of strangers: Theory and evidence on spatial distance and giving Corruption, trade liberalization and firm productivity: Evidence from Vietnam Infrastructure and global value chain position: Evidence from China Acquisitions, inventors’ turnover, and innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1