Land transfer and cropping structure: Evidence from China

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Analysis and Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2025.02.001
Yifan Qian, Xingjian Yao
{"title":"Land transfer and cropping structure: Evidence from China","authors":"Yifan Qian,&nbsp;Xingjian Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2023, China’s total grain output reached 1.3 trillion kilograms, marking 20 consecutive years of abundant harvests. While China has achieved remarkable historical milestones in ensuring food security, significant challenges remain, including structural imbalances in grain production, insufficient intrinsic motivation among farmers to grow grain, and a complex and volatile international environment. Building on a comprehensive review of existing literature, this paper categorizes Chinese farmers into two types: Type I farmers, who typically cultivate relatively small farmland areas, and Type II farmers, who operate larger farmland areas. Their crop planting decisions are analyzed within the frameworks of economies of scale and marginal profit analysis, and the proposed hypotheses are verified through numerical simulations. Using provincial-level data spanning from 2005 to 2022, the paper further establishes a bilateral stochastic frontier model for empirical measurement. The key findings are as follows: (1) The crowding-out effect of land transfer on the proportion of grain crops outweighs the crowding-in effect. (2) From 2011 to 2021, the crowding-out effect of land transfer on grain crop planting proportions demonstrates a positive spatial correlation. (3) The net negative effect of land transfer on grain planting proportions is smallest in major grain-producing areas but is more pronounced in regions with lower levels of rural financial development. Based on these findings, this paper proposes targeted recommendations to mitigate the non-grain effect of land transfer and safeguard food security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"85 ","pages":"Pages 1492-1513"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359262500030X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2023, China’s total grain output reached 1.3 trillion kilograms, marking 20 consecutive years of abundant harvests. While China has achieved remarkable historical milestones in ensuring food security, significant challenges remain, including structural imbalances in grain production, insufficient intrinsic motivation among farmers to grow grain, and a complex and volatile international environment. Building on a comprehensive review of existing literature, this paper categorizes Chinese farmers into two types: Type I farmers, who typically cultivate relatively small farmland areas, and Type II farmers, who operate larger farmland areas. Their crop planting decisions are analyzed within the frameworks of economies of scale and marginal profit analysis, and the proposed hypotheses are verified through numerical simulations. Using provincial-level data spanning from 2005 to 2022, the paper further establishes a bilateral stochastic frontier model for empirical measurement. The key findings are as follows: (1) The crowding-out effect of land transfer on the proportion of grain crops outweighs the crowding-in effect. (2) From 2011 to 2021, the crowding-out effect of land transfer on grain crop planting proportions demonstrates a positive spatial correlation. (3) The net negative effect of land transfer on grain planting proportions is smallest in major grain-producing areas but is more pronounced in regions with lower levels of rural financial development. Based on these findings, this paper proposes targeted recommendations to mitigate the non-grain effect of land transfer and safeguard food security.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
期刊最新文献
Innovative incentive effects of domestic market integration: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta region of China The dynamic influence of green technology and environmental taxes on consumption-based carbon emissions in Brazil Does rural Households’ financial literacy affect the household portfolio choices in poverty alleviation areas? Corporate bond defaults and cross-regional investment: Evidence from China Dose tariff exposure stimulate city crimes? Evidence from China-US trade war
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1