Os Acetabuli Do Not Portend Inferior 2-Year Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Reconstruction

Bilal S. Siddiq B.S. , Jeffrey S. Mun B.A. , Michael C. Dean B.A. , Stephen M. Gillinov A.B. , Jonathan S. Lee B.A. , Kieran S. Dowley B.A. , Nathan J. Cherian M.D. , Scott D. Martin M.D.
{"title":"Os Acetabuli Do Not Portend Inferior 2-Year Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Reconstruction","authors":"Bilal S. Siddiq B.S. ,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Mun B.A. ,&nbsp;Michael C. Dean B.A. ,&nbsp;Stephen M. Gillinov A.B. ,&nbsp;Jonathan S. Lee B.A. ,&nbsp;Kieran S. Dowley B.A. ,&nbsp;Nathan J. Cherian M.D. ,&nbsp;Scott D. Martin M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate whether os acetabuli identified preoperatively influence functional outcomes 2 years after an arthroscopic acetabular labral reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective study with prospectively collected data of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy by a single, fellowship-trained surgeon at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years and completion of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) preoperatively and at 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and last follow-up timepoints. Exclusion criteria included labral debridement, hip dysplasia, advanced hip osteoarthritis (Tonnis &gt;1), or previous surgery on the ipsilateral hip. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the presence of os acetabuli (OA) or the absence of os acetabuli (NOA). Primary outcomes collected included the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Secondary outcomes were the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, and visual analog pain scale. Inter-cohort outcomes were compared using linear mixed-effects and Fisher’s exact tests. Nonlinear improvement trajectories were accounted for by sensitivity analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>193 hips (49.2% female; mean ± SD age: 35.9 ± 11.0) were included in the final analyses. Of these, 25 (13.0%) had an os acetabulum. No significant differences between patients with and without os acetabuli were found throughout the minimum 2-year follow-up period in terms of iHOT-33 scores (weighted difference: 0.09; 95% CI: −6.81, 6.98; <em>P</em> = .98), mHHS (weighted difference: 2.93; 95% CI: −2.13, 7.98; <em>P</em> = .26), or any secondary outcomes. Additionally, there were no significant differences in any queried clinically meaningful outcomes (<em>P</em> &gt; .05 for all), revision arthroscopy (<em>P</em> =.342), rates of formation of heterotopic ossification (<em>p</em> &gt; .999), or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (<em>P</em> &gt; .999). These results were upheld across sensitivity analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with os acetabuli undergoing arthroscopic labral reconstruction had similar 2-year functional outcomes compared to those without os acetabuli.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III, Retrospective cohort study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 101026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2400169X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether os acetabuli identified preoperatively influence functional outcomes 2 years after an arthroscopic acetabular labral reconstruction.

Methods

Retrospective study with prospectively collected data of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy by a single, fellowship-trained surgeon at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years and completion of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) preoperatively and at 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and last follow-up timepoints. Exclusion criteria included labral debridement, hip dysplasia, advanced hip osteoarthritis (Tonnis >1), or previous surgery on the ipsilateral hip. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the presence of os acetabuli (OA) or the absence of os acetabuli (NOA). Primary outcomes collected included the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Secondary outcomes were the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, and visual analog pain scale. Inter-cohort outcomes were compared using linear mixed-effects and Fisher’s exact tests. Nonlinear improvement trajectories were accounted for by sensitivity analyses.

Results

193 hips (49.2% female; mean ± SD age: 35.9 ± 11.0) were included in the final analyses. Of these, 25 (13.0%) had an os acetabulum. No significant differences between patients with and without os acetabuli were found throughout the minimum 2-year follow-up period in terms of iHOT-33 scores (weighted difference: 0.09; 95% CI: −6.81, 6.98; P = .98), mHHS (weighted difference: 2.93; 95% CI: −2.13, 7.98; P = .26), or any secondary outcomes. Additionally, there were no significant differences in any queried clinically meaningful outcomes (P > .05 for all), revision arthroscopy (P =.342), rates of formation of heterotopic ossification (p > .999), or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (P > .999). These results were upheld across sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Patients with os acetabuli undergoing arthroscopic labral reconstruction had similar 2-year functional outcomes compared to those without os acetabuli.

Level of Evidence

Level III, Retrospective cohort study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Major League Baseball Pitchers’ Arm Angles Measured on Game Videos Were Not Associated With an Increased Risk of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury The Perineal Post for Hip Arthroscopy Is Dead—Or at Least It Should Be Rotator Cuff Repairs Using Double-Row Modified Mason-Allen Stitches Resulted in Superior Clinical Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-Up Compared to the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique: A Case-Control Matching Study Both Single- and Double-anchor Remplissage Techniques Restore Native Stability in a Cadaveric Model of Hill-Sachs Lesions in Anterior Shoulder Instability The Use of a Suture Bridge Technique for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Under 40 Years of Age Resulted in Successful Tendon Healing, Pain Relief, Improved Shoulder Function, and High Patient Satisfaction at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1