Evaluation of performance of the Still Activity Score for assessment of Adult-onset Still's Disease: Comparative study with Systemic Feature Score and Modified Pouchot-Activity Score

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Reumatologia Clinica Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.reuma.2024.501814
Emine Uslu , Müçteba Enes Yayla , Didem Şahin-Eroğlu , Büşra Atmaca-Haktaniyan , Nilgün Göveç-Giynaş , Recep Yilmaz , Ahmet İlbay , Abdulbaki Gaydan , Yeter Mahmutoğlu , Ahmet Usta , Tahsin Murat Turgaya , Gülay Kinikli , Aşkın Ateş
{"title":"Evaluation of performance of the Still Activity Score for assessment of Adult-onset Still's Disease: Comparative study with Systemic Feature Score and Modified Pouchot-Activity Score","authors":"Emine Uslu ,&nbsp;Müçteba Enes Yayla ,&nbsp;Didem Şahin-Eroğlu ,&nbsp;Büşra Atmaca-Haktaniyan ,&nbsp;Nilgün Göveç-Giynaş ,&nbsp;Recep Yilmaz ,&nbsp;Ahmet İlbay ,&nbsp;Abdulbaki Gaydan ,&nbsp;Yeter Mahmutoğlu ,&nbsp;Ahmet Usta ,&nbsp;Tahsin Murat Turgaya ,&nbsp;Gülay Kinikli ,&nbsp;Aşkın Ateş","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2024.501814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Backgrounds</h3><div>Adult-onset Still's Disease (AOSD) is a systemic inflammatory disorder. There is no definitive AOSD activity indicator. Two of the currently used disease activity scores are the Modified Pouchot Activity Score (mPoS), and Systemic Feature Score (SFS). Another scoring system has been recently introduced, named the Still Activity Score (SAS).</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>In this single-center cross-sectional study, we aimed to compare the performance of the SAS with the mPoS and SFS, both of which have been used for a long time for measuring disease activity in patients with AOSD.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>69 patients aged 18 or older were screened in the study who attended the Ankara University Faculty of Medicine between 2010 and 2020 with a diagnosis of AOSD. We compared SAS, SFS and mPoS with physician global assessment (PhGA) in patients with AOSD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 69 patients screened, 45 patients with AOSD who fulfilled the Yamaguchi criteria were analyzed. The results showed no significant difference in SAS between patients with PhGA<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->6 and PhGA<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->6, but mPoS and SFS scores were higher in the PhGA<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->6 group (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.053, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007, respectively). There was a significant correlation between mPoS and PhGA (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.018).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first study to evaluate the SAS score, which is used for patients with AOSD. SAS is user-friendly but may not be as sensitive as mPoS and SFS for assessing disease activity in AOSD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":"21 2","pages":"Article 501814"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X24001359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds

Adult-onset Still's Disease (AOSD) is a systemic inflammatory disorder. There is no definitive AOSD activity indicator. Two of the currently used disease activity scores are the Modified Pouchot Activity Score (mPoS), and Systemic Feature Score (SFS). Another scoring system has been recently introduced, named the Still Activity Score (SAS).

Aims

In this single-center cross-sectional study, we aimed to compare the performance of the SAS with the mPoS and SFS, both of which have been used for a long time for measuring disease activity in patients with AOSD.

Method

69 patients aged 18 or older were screened in the study who attended the Ankara University Faculty of Medicine between 2010 and 2020 with a diagnosis of AOSD. We compared SAS, SFS and mPoS with physician global assessment (PhGA) in patients with AOSD.

Results

Of 69 patients screened, 45 patients with AOSD who fulfilled the Yamaguchi criteria were analyzed. The results showed no significant difference in SAS between patients with PhGA < 6 and PhGA  6, but mPoS and SFS scores were higher in the PhGA  6 group (p = 0.053, p = 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively). There was a significant correlation between mPoS and PhGA (p = 0.018).

Conclusion

This is the first study to evaluate the SAS score, which is used for patients with AOSD. SAS is user-friendly but may not be as sensitive as mPoS and SFS for assessing disease activity in AOSD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reumatologia Clinica
Reumatologia Clinica RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
期刊最新文献
Prevalencia de hidrosadenitis supurativa en pacientes con espondiloartritis axial Enfermedades reumatológicas en pacientes con hepatitis autoinmune en un hospital de cuarto nivel de Bogotá entre el 2013 al 2023 Comorbidities in Mexican Mestizo patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A cross-sectional study of 523 patients in a preventive cardio-rheumatology clinic Evaluation of performance of the Still Activity Score for assessment of Adult-onset Still's Disease: Comparative study with Systemic Feature Score and Modified Pouchot-Activity Score Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Functional Ability Scale in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1