Evaluation of the main drivers of environmental and climatic changes of the sea-surface across the Cretaceous-Paleogene transition: A global perspective
Vicente Gilabert , Sietske J. Batenburg , José A. Arz , Nils B. Baumann , Marcel Regelous , Ignacio Arenillas
{"title":"Evaluation of the main drivers of environmental and climatic changes of the sea-surface across the Cretaceous-Paleogene transition: A global perspective","authors":"Vicente Gilabert , Sietske J. Batenburg , José A. Arz , Nils B. Baumann , Marcel Regelous , Ignacio Arenillas","doi":"10.1016/j.geobios.2024.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Chicxulub impact and Deccan volcanism have long been considered opposing factors to explain the changes observed across the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary (KPB). Although the geologically instantaneous effects of the Chicxulub impact better explain the KPB catastrophic mass extinction, refinement of geochemical and micropaleontological proxies contributes to assessing the actual role of the Deccan volcanism in environmental changes across the KPB. Furthermore, cyclostratigraphy is being used to evaluate the role of orbital forcing on climate, and to refine age models. In this paper, we evaluate the climate and environmental changes across the KPB (66.100–65.350 Ma) from a global perspective, exploring several proxies from the Pacific, Atlantic and Tethyan realms: bulk δ<sup>18</sup>O and δ<sup>13</sup>C disturbances, mercury enrichments, and blooms of triserial guembelitriids and aberrant planktic foraminifera. The KPB, Dan-C2 and LC29n events, dated at 66.0, 65.8–65.7 and 65.47–65.41 Ma, respectively, have been recognized in all Tethyan and Atlantic localities, but only the KPB in the Pacific. Multiproxy analysis suggests that volcanic activity of the Deccan Traps did not have a relevant role in the aforementioned events, but contributed to environmental stress in the first 10 kyr of the Danian, and between ∼70 and 200 kyr after the KPB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55116,"journal":{"name":"Geobios","volume":"88 ","pages":"Pages 125-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geobios","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016699524000925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Chicxulub impact and Deccan volcanism have long been considered opposing factors to explain the changes observed across the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary (KPB). Although the geologically instantaneous effects of the Chicxulub impact better explain the KPB catastrophic mass extinction, refinement of geochemical and micropaleontological proxies contributes to assessing the actual role of the Deccan volcanism in environmental changes across the KPB. Furthermore, cyclostratigraphy is being used to evaluate the role of orbital forcing on climate, and to refine age models. In this paper, we evaluate the climate and environmental changes across the KPB (66.100–65.350 Ma) from a global perspective, exploring several proxies from the Pacific, Atlantic and Tethyan realms: bulk δ18O and δ13C disturbances, mercury enrichments, and blooms of triserial guembelitriids and aberrant planktic foraminifera. The KPB, Dan-C2 and LC29n events, dated at 66.0, 65.8–65.7 and 65.47–65.41 Ma, respectively, have been recognized in all Tethyan and Atlantic localities, but only the KPB in the Pacific. Multiproxy analysis suggests that volcanic activity of the Deccan Traps did not have a relevant role in the aforementioned events, but contributed to environmental stress in the first 10 kyr of the Danian, and between ∼70 and 200 kyr after the KPB.
期刊介绍:
Geobios publishes bimonthly in English original peer-reviewed articles of international interest in any area of paleontology, paleobiology, paleoecology, paleobiogeography, (bio)stratigraphy and biogeochemistry. All taxonomic groups are treated, including microfossils, invertebrates, plants, vertebrates and ichnofossils.
Geobios welcomes descriptive papers based on original material (e.g. large Systematic Paleontology works), as well as more analytically and/or methodologically oriented papers, provided they offer strong and significant biochronological/biostratigraphical, paleobiogeographical, paleobiological and/or phylogenetic new insights and perspectices. A high priority level is given to synchronic and/or diachronic studies based on multi- or inter-disciplinary approaches mixing various fields of Earth and Life Sciences. Works based on extant data are also considered, provided they offer significant insights into geological-time studies.